[Emotional overload of health personnel of the Navarra Health Service during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic].

Silvia Serrano-Domínguez, Matilde Lahera-Martín, Berta Ibáñez-Beroiz, Concepción Alsúa-Fernández, Elena Ordoqui-García, Beatriz Furtado-Eraso, Asan Mollov, Belén Asenjo-Redín
{"title":"[Emotional overload of health personnel of the Navarra Health Service during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic].","authors":"Silvia Serrano-Domínguez, Matilde Lahera-Martín, Berta Ibáñez-Beroiz, Concepción Alsúa-Fernández, Elena Ordoqui-García, Beatriz Furtado-Eraso, Asan Mollov, Belén Asenjo-Redín","doi":"10.12961/aprl.2023.26.04.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health care workers faced unprecedented levels of emotional burden related to the COVID-19 pandemic.. This study aims to find out the self-perception of the state of emotional overload of the professionals of the Navarre Osasunbidea Health Service (SNS-O) at two moments during the pandemic and its associated factors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cross-sectional study using a questionnaire that includes the Emotional Overload Self-Assessment Scale sent by email to all SNS-O health professionals at two moments of the pandemic, in October 2020 and October 2021. Results of the global scale and of the subscales '\"fear-anxiety\"' and \"\"affective response\"' were compared between the two moments of measurement according to position, field, area and service using ANCOVA models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of responding participants in the 2020 survey was 1 485 (11,3%) and 950 in the 2021 survey (7,3%). The mean difference for overall score between 2020 and 2021 was -1.87 (95% CI: -2.38, -1.35), indicating less worrying results with the passage of time since the start of the pandemic, with some differences accross occupational categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The year 2020 had a great impact on the emotional overload that decreased the following year. One of the greatest fears of health personnel during their occupational exposure to epidemic infectious diseases continues to be the fear of contracting the disease and transmitting it to their family members and social environment. As the proximity to the patient and their environment increases, the probability of psycho-emotional affectation increases.</p>","PeriodicalId":101300,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de prevencion de riesgos laborales","volume":"26 4","pages":"275-290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de prevencion de riesgos laborales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2023.26.04.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Health care workers faced unprecedented levels of emotional burden related to the COVID-19 pandemic.. This study aims to find out the self-perception of the state of emotional overload of the professionals of the Navarre Osasunbidea Health Service (SNS-O) at two moments during the pandemic and its associated factors.

Method: Cross-sectional study using a questionnaire that includes the Emotional Overload Self-Assessment Scale sent by email to all SNS-O health professionals at two moments of the pandemic, in October 2020 and October 2021. Results of the global scale and of the subscales '"fear-anxiety"' and ""affective response"' were compared between the two moments of measurement according to position, field, area and service using ANCOVA models.

Results: The number of responding participants in the 2020 survey was 1 485 (11,3%) and 950 in the 2021 survey (7,3%). The mean difference for overall score between 2020 and 2021 was -1.87 (95% CI: -2.38, -1.35), indicating less worrying results with the passage of time since the start of the pandemic, with some differences accross occupational categories.

Conclusions: The year 2020 had a great impact on the emotional overload that decreased the following year. One of the greatest fears of health personnel during their occupational exposure to epidemic infectious diseases continues to be the fear of contracting the disease and transmitting it to their family members and social environment. As the proximity to the patient and their environment increases, the probability of psycho-emotional affectation increases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[在严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型大流行期间,纳瓦拉卫生服务局的卫生人员情绪超负荷]。
简介:医护人员面临着与新冠肺炎大流行相关的前所未有的情感负担。。本研究旨在了解纳瓦拉-奥萨松比德卫生服务(SNS-O)专业人员在疫情期间两个时刻对情绪超负荷状态的自我感知及其相关因素。方法:在2020年10月和2021年10月这两个疫情时刻,通过电子邮件向所有SNS-O卫生专业人员发送了一份包括情绪超负荷自我评估量表的横断面研究。使用ANCOVA模型,根据位置、领域、区域和服务,比较了全球量表和分量表“恐惧焦虑”和“情感反应”在两个测量时刻的结果2020年和2021年之间的总分平均差异为-1.87(95%置信区间:-2.38,-1.35),这表明自疫情开始以来,随着时间的推移,结果不那么令人担忧,不同职业类别之间存在一些差异。结论:2020年对情绪超负荷产生了很大影响,情绪超负荷在第二年有所下降。卫生人员在职业接触流行性传染病期间最大的恐惧之一仍然是害怕感染这种疾病并将其传播给家人和社会环境。随着与患者及其环境的距离增加,心理-情感做作的可能性也会增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Perceived work self-efficacy, and characteristics of return to work in women survivors of breast cancer at two reference centers in Colombia]. Integrated psychological intervention programme for frontline healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. A qualitative study. Ergonomics, musculoskeletal disorders, treatment and return to work: a conceptual framework for intervention programs. [Australia's engineered stone ban. A sound decision]. [Patient safety training for ward clerks of an Occupational Mutual Insurance Company collaborating with the Social Security, immediate impact and after six months].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1