The Differences of Quantitative Flow Ratio in Coronary Artery Stenosis with or without Atrial Fibrillation.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of interventional cardiology Pub Date : 2023-10-13 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/7278343
Wenbin Lu, Xiaoguo Zhang, Gaoliang Yan, Genshan Ma
{"title":"The Differences of Quantitative Flow Ratio in Coronary Artery Stenosis with or without Atrial Fibrillation.","authors":"Wenbin Lu,&nbsp;Xiaoguo Zhang,&nbsp;Gaoliang Yan,&nbsp;Genshan Ma","doi":"10.1155/2023/7278343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a new method for the assessment of the extent of coronary artery stenosis. But it may be obscured by the cardiac remodeling and abnormal blood flow of the coronary artery when encountering atrial fibrillation (AF). The present study aimed to examine the impact of these changed structures and blood flow of coronary arteries on QFR results in AF patients. <i>Methods and Results</i>. We evaluated QFR in 223 patients (112 patients with AF; 111 non-AF patients served as controls) who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) due to severe stenoses in coronary arteries. QFR of the target coronary was determined according to the flow rate of the contrast agent. Results showed that AF patients had significantly higher QFR values than control (0.792 ± 0.118 vs. 0.685 ± 0.167, <i>p</i> < 0.001). We further analyzed local QFR around the stenoses (0.858 ± 0.304 vs. 0.756 ± 0.146, <i>p</i>=0.002), residual QFR (0.958 ± 0.055 vs. 0.929 ± 0.093, <i>p</i>=0.005), and index QFR (0.807 ± 0.108 vs. 0.713 ± 0.152, <i>p</i> < 0.001) in these two groups of patients with and without AF. Further analysis revealed that QFR in AF patients was negatively correlated with coronary flow velocity (<i>R</i> = -0.22, <i>p</i>=0.02) and area of stenosis (<i>R</i> = -0.70, <i>p</i> < 0.001) but positively correlated with the minimum lumen area (MLA) (<i>R</i> = 0.47, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <i>Conclusion</i>. AF patients with coronary artery stenosis have higher QFR values, which are associated with decreased blood flow velocity, smaller stenosis, and larger MLA in AF patients upon cardiac remodeling.</p>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2023 ","pages":"7278343"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10589068/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7278343","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a new method for the assessment of the extent of coronary artery stenosis. But it may be obscured by the cardiac remodeling and abnormal blood flow of the coronary artery when encountering atrial fibrillation (AF). The present study aimed to examine the impact of these changed structures and blood flow of coronary arteries on QFR results in AF patients. Methods and Results. We evaluated QFR in 223 patients (112 patients with AF; 111 non-AF patients served as controls) who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) due to severe stenoses in coronary arteries. QFR of the target coronary was determined according to the flow rate of the contrast agent. Results showed that AF patients had significantly higher QFR values than control (0.792 ± 0.118 vs. 0.685 ± 0.167, p < 0.001). We further analyzed local QFR around the stenoses (0.858 ± 0.304 vs. 0.756 ± 0.146, p=0.002), residual QFR (0.958 ± 0.055 vs. 0.929 ± 0.093, p=0.005), and index QFR (0.807 ± 0.108 vs. 0.713 ± 0.152, p < 0.001) in these two groups of patients with and without AF. Further analysis revealed that QFR in AF patients was negatively correlated with coronary flow velocity (R = -0.22, p=0.02) and area of stenosis (R = -0.70, p < 0.001) but positively correlated with the minimum lumen area (MLA) (R = 0.47, p < 0.001). Conclusion. AF patients with coronary artery stenosis have higher QFR values, which are associated with decreased blood flow velocity, smaller stenosis, and larger MLA in AF patients upon cardiac remodeling.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠状动脉狭窄伴或不伴心房颤动患者定量血流比的差异。
定量流量比(QFR)是评价冠状动脉狭窄程度的一种新方法。但当遇到心房颤动(AF)时,它可能会被心脏重塑和冠状动脉异常血流所掩盖。本研究旨在研究这些改变的冠状动脉结构和血流对AF患者QFR结果的影响。方法和结果。我们评估了223名因冠状动脉严重狭窄而接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者(112名AF患者;111名非AF患者作为对照)的QFR。根据造影剂的流速确定目标冠状动脉的QFR。结果显示,房颤患者的QFR值明显高于对照组(0.792 ± 0.118对0.685 ± 0.167,p<0.001)。我们进一步分析了狭窄周围的局部QFR(0.858 ± 0.304对0.756 ± 0.146,p=0.002),残余QFR(0.958 ± 0.055对0.929 ± 0.093,p=0.005),指数QFR(0.807 ± 0.108对0.713 ± 0.152,p<0.001)。进一步分析显示,AF患者的QFR与冠状动脉血流速度呈负相关(R = -0.22,p=0.02)和狭窄面积(R = -0.70,p<0.001),但与最小管腔面积(MLA)呈正相关(R = 0.47,p<0.001)。冠状动脉狭窄的AF患者具有较高的QFR值,这与心脏重塑后AF患者的血流速度下降、狭窄程度较小和MLA较大有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of interventional cardiology
Journal of interventional cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Interventional Cardiology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for cardiologists determined to stay current in the diagnosis, investigation, and management of patients with cardiovascular disease and its associated complications. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on new procedures and techniques in all major subject areas in the field, including: Acute coronary syndrome Coronary disease Congenital heart diseases Myocardial infarction Peripheral arterial disease Valvular heart disease Cardiac hemodynamics and physiology Haemostasis and thrombosis
期刊最新文献
Epidemiological Trends, Etiology, and Burden Study of Heart Failure in China, 1990–2019 A Comparative Analysis of Primary and Bailout ADR in CTO-PCI The Effect of Electromagnetic Interference Produced by Smartphones Using 5G Network on Patients With Permanent Pacemakers (EMS5G-PPM Study) Comparison of Sheathless and Sheathed Guiding Catheters in Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using the DynamX Sirolimus-Eluting Bioadaptor: 12-Month Clinical and Imaging Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1