Does BRAF mutation status and related clinicopathological factors affect the recurrence rate of ameloblastoma? A systematic review, meta-analysis and metaregression
{"title":"Does BRAF mutation status and related clinicopathological factors affect the recurrence rate of ameloblastoma? A systematic review, meta-analysis and metaregression","authors":"Ashutosh Kumar Singh, Ragavi Alagarsamy, Rajib Chaulagain, Abanish Singh, Dipak Sapkota, Selvam Thavaraj, Rabindra P. Singh","doi":"10.1111/jop.13494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This review aims to analyse the recurrence rate in <i>BRAFv600e</i>+ and <i>BRAFv600e</i>− ameloblastomas and explore its association with clinicopathological variables.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A comprehensive search was conducted using databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar and grey literature, without any limitation on start date or language up to 20 June 2023. A random effect meta-analysis was conducted and Metaregression analyses were performed based on available clinicopathological factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fifteen studies met the criteria for meta-analysis of outcomes. There was no significant difference in overall recurrence rates between the two groups (risk difference = 0.001, <i>p</i>-value = 0.987). Increasing male:female ratio in the <i>BRAFv600e</i>+ group was associated with a lower reported recurrence, suggesting a higher recurrence rate in females. The odds of having mandibular lesion were four times higher in <i>BRAFv600e</i>+ cases compared to <i>BRAFv600e</i>− cases (confidence interval: 2.121–7.870, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 28.37%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Within the <i>BRAFv600e</i>+ group, females showed a higher reported recurrence rate. This specific clinical group may benefit from <i>BRAFv600e</i> mutation investigation and potential upscaled surgical treatment and additional BRAF inhibitor therapy, which needs validation in future studies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jop.13494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objectives
This review aims to analyse the recurrence rate in BRAFv600e+ and BRAFv600e− ameloblastomas and explore its association with clinicopathological variables.
Methods
A comprehensive search was conducted using databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar and grey literature, without any limitation on start date or language up to 20 June 2023. A random effect meta-analysis was conducted and Metaregression analyses were performed based on available clinicopathological factors.
Results
Fifteen studies met the criteria for meta-analysis of outcomes. There was no significant difference in overall recurrence rates between the two groups (risk difference = 0.001, p-value = 0.987). Increasing male:female ratio in the BRAFv600e+ group was associated with a lower reported recurrence, suggesting a higher recurrence rate in females. The odds of having mandibular lesion were four times higher in BRAFv600e+ cases compared to BRAFv600e− cases (confidence interval: 2.121–7.870, p < 0.001, I2 = 28.37%).
Conclusion
Within the BRAFv600e+ group, females showed a higher reported recurrence rate. This specific clinical group may benefit from BRAFv600e mutation investigation and potential upscaled surgical treatment and additional BRAF inhibitor therapy, which needs validation in future studies.