Prevalence of computer vision syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Optometry Pub Date : 2023-10-30 DOI:10.1016/j.optom.2023.100482
Fabricio Ccami-Bernal , David R. Soriano-Moreno , Milton A. Romero-Robles , Fernanda Barriga-Chambi , Kimberly G. Tuco , Sharong D. Castro-Diaz , Janeth N. Nuñez-Lupaca , Josmel Pacheco-Mendoza , Tomas Galvez-Olortegui , Vicente A. Benites-Zapata
{"title":"Prevalence of computer vision syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Fabricio Ccami-Bernal ,&nbsp;David R. Soriano-Moreno ,&nbsp;Milton A. Romero-Robles ,&nbsp;Fernanda Barriga-Chambi ,&nbsp;Kimberly G. Tuco ,&nbsp;Sharong D. Castro-Diaz ,&nbsp;Janeth N. Nuñez-Lupaca ,&nbsp;Josmel Pacheco-Mendoza ,&nbsp;Tomas Galvez-Olortegui ,&nbsp;Vicente A. Benites-Zapata","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2023.100482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This review aimed to estimate the prevalence of computer vision syndrome (CVS) in the general population and subgroups.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A search was conducted in the following the databases: PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and Web of Science until February 13, 2023. We included studies that assessed the prevalence of CVS in any population. The Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of CVS was done using a random-effects model, assessing the sources of heterogeneity using subgroup and meta-regression analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 103 cross-sectional studies with 66 577 participants were included. The prevalence of CVS was 69.0% (95% CI: 62.3 to 75.3; I<sup>2</sup>: 99.7%), ranging from 12.1 to 97.3% across studies. Point prevalence was higher in women than in men (71.4 vs. 61.8%), university students (76.1%), Africa (71.2%), Asia (69.9%), contact lens wearers (73.1% vs. 63.8%) in studies conducted before the COVID-19 pandemic (72.8%), and in those that did not use the CVS-Q questionnaire (75.4%). In meta-regression, using the CVS-Q scale was associated with a lower prevalence of CVS.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Seven out of ten people suffer from CVS. Preventive strategies and interventions are needed to decrease the prevalence of this condition which can affect productivity and quality of life. Future studies should standardize a definition of CVS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000304/pdfft?md5=cfb25c8a10182d12e0d87a3443262175&pid=1-s2.0-S1888429623000304-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429623000304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This review aimed to estimate the prevalence of computer vision syndrome (CVS) in the general population and subgroups.

Methods

A search was conducted in the following the databases: PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and Web of Science until February 13, 2023. We included studies that assessed the prevalence of CVS in any population. The Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of CVS was done using a random-effects model, assessing the sources of heterogeneity using subgroup and meta-regression analyses.

Results

A total of 103 cross-sectional studies with 66 577 participants were included. The prevalence of CVS was 69.0% (95% CI: 62.3 to 75.3; I2: 99.7%), ranging from 12.1 to 97.3% across studies. Point prevalence was higher in women than in men (71.4 vs. 61.8%), university students (76.1%), Africa (71.2%), Asia (69.9%), contact lens wearers (73.1% vs. 63.8%) in studies conducted before the COVID-19 pandemic (72.8%), and in those that did not use the CVS-Q questionnaire (75.4%). In meta-regression, using the CVS-Q scale was associated with a lower prevalence of CVS.

Conclusion

Seven out of ten people suffer from CVS. Preventive strategies and interventions are needed to decrease the prevalence of this condition which can affect productivity and quality of life. Future studies should standardize a definition of CVS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算机视觉综合征的患病率:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:本综述旨在评估计算机视觉综合征(CVS)在普通人群和亚组中的患病率。方法:在以下数据库中进行搜索:PubMed、SCOPUS、EMBASE和Web of Science,直到2023年2月13日。我们纳入了评估任何人群中CVS患病率的研究。乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的批判性评估工具用于评估方法质量。使用随机效应模型对CVS患病率进行荟萃分析,使用亚组和元回归分析评估异质性来源。结果:共纳入103项横断面研究,共有66577名参与者。CVS的患病率为69.0%(95%CI:62.3至75.3;I2:99.7%),各研究的患病率在12.1%至97.3%之间。在新冠肺炎大流行前进行的研究中,女性的点患病率高于男性(71.4%对61.8%)、大学生(76.1%)、非洲(71.2%)、亚洲(69.9%)、隐形眼镜佩戴者(73.1%对63.8%)(72.8%)和未使用CVS-Q问卷的人(75.4%),使用CVS-Q量表与较低的CVS患病率相关。结论:十分之七的人患有CVS。需要采取预防策略和干预措施来降低这种可能影响生产力和生活质量的疾病的流行率。未来的研究应该将CVS的定义标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Optometry
Journal of Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Analysis of patient referrals from primary care to ophthalmology. The role of the optometrist Corneal higher-order aberrations in different types of irregular cornea Intraocular pressure and its association with ocular biometrics in Iranian children Comparison of macular thickness in diabetic patients acquired from optical coherence tomography mode and optical coherence tomography angiography mode in Cirrus HD-OCT 5000 JOptom's Web of Science (WoS) impact factor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1