Urban informal waste recycling in Tehran: Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards health risks during recycling process

Zahra Ghaedrahmati , Mohtasham Ghaffari , Yadollah Mehrabi , Nadali Alavi , Fatemeh Amereh , Kasra Roostaei , Mohammad Rafiee
{"title":"Urban informal waste recycling in Tehran: Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards health risks during recycling process","authors":"Zahra Ghaedrahmati ,&nbsp;Mohtasham Ghaffari ,&nbsp;Yadollah Mehrabi ,&nbsp;Nadali Alavi ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Amereh ,&nbsp;Kasra Roostaei ,&nbsp;Mohammad Rafiee","doi":"10.1016/j.clwas.2022.100064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study presents health risks-related perceptions during informal recycling of municipal solid waste in Tehran, Iran, associated with poor management. We developed a proved reliable and valid questionnaire which provided information of detailed evaluations from a total of 384 participants who agreed to be interviewed. The participants showed an acceptable knowledge and positive attitude towards waste picking related health risks. However, healthy and safe behaviors were not so common among them. The majority of respondents (33.6 %) not only showed continuing to work even with the knowledge of the existence of sharp objects and infectious waste in garbage bags. However, they were also weak to seek timely healthcare and medical check-up, as well as personal hygiene and healthy diet practices. These inappropriate garbage scavenging behaviors, evidenced by severe injuries, were most dominant among uneducated, low-income, and younger participants. Unsafe and life-threatening practices were explained by lack of awareness or sense of need, oblivion, difficulty to access washing facilities at city-wide, work-related fatigue, time saving, as well as high cost of personal protective equipment (PPE) and screening tests. Socio-demographic factors predicting garbage scavengers’ unsafe behaviors were also analyzed. Knowledge of garbage scavengers about exposure or outcomes of unsafe practices is unlikely to influence willingness to take safe and acceptable practices, leading to the idea that such practices are unavoidable. However, improving garbage scavengers’ perception about health risks through experienced colleagues and development of effective behaviors-changing interventions may hold great promise for promoting their health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100256,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Waste Systems","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100064"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Waste Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772912522000641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study presents health risks-related perceptions during informal recycling of municipal solid waste in Tehran, Iran, associated with poor management. We developed a proved reliable and valid questionnaire which provided information of detailed evaluations from a total of 384 participants who agreed to be interviewed. The participants showed an acceptable knowledge and positive attitude towards waste picking related health risks. However, healthy and safe behaviors were not so common among them. The majority of respondents (33.6 %) not only showed continuing to work even with the knowledge of the existence of sharp objects and infectious waste in garbage bags. However, they were also weak to seek timely healthcare and medical check-up, as well as personal hygiene and healthy diet practices. These inappropriate garbage scavenging behaviors, evidenced by severe injuries, were most dominant among uneducated, low-income, and younger participants. Unsafe and life-threatening practices were explained by lack of awareness or sense of need, oblivion, difficulty to access washing facilities at city-wide, work-related fatigue, time saving, as well as high cost of personal protective equipment (PPE) and screening tests. Socio-demographic factors predicting garbage scavengers’ unsafe behaviors were also analyzed. Knowledge of garbage scavengers about exposure or outcomes of unsafe practices is unlikely to influence willingness to take safe and acceptable practices, leading to the idea that such practices are unavoidable. However, improving garbage scavengers’ perception about health risks through experienced colleagues and development of effective behaviors-changing interventions may hold great promise for promoting their health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德黑兰城市非正规废物回收:回收过程中对健康风险的知识、态度和做法
这项研究介绍了伊朗德黑兰城市固体废物非正式回收过程中与健康风险相关的看法,这些看法与管理不善有关。我们开发了一份经证明可靠有效的问卷,该问卷提供了384名同意接受采访的参与者的详细评估信息。参与者对垃圾收集相关的健康风险表现出了可接受的知识和积极的态度。然而,健康和安全的行为在他们当中并不常见。大多数受访者(33.6%)不仅表示,即使知道垃圾袋中存在尖锐物体和传染性废物,他们仍在继续工作。然而,他们也无力寻求及时的医疗保健和体检,以及个人卫生和健康饮食习惯。这些不适当的垃圾清理行为,以严重伤害为证据,在未受过教育、低收入和年轻的参与者中占主导地位。不安全和危及生命的做法被解释为缺乏意识或需求感、遗忘、难以进入全市范围的洗涤设施、与工作相关的疲劳、节省时间,以及个人防护设备和筛查费用高昂。还分析了预测垃圾拾荒者不安全行为的社会人口学因素。垃圾拾荒者对不安全做法的暴露或结果的了解不太可能影响采取安全和可接受做法的意愿,从而导致这种做法是不可避免的。然而,通过经验丰富的同事提高垃圾拾荒者对健康风险的感知,并制定有效的行为改变干预措施,可能对促进他们的健康有很大的希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transforming waste into strength: Evaluating properties of concrete with waste glass substitution Quantification and characterization of municipal solid waste at aler dumpsite, Lira City, Uganda: Assessing pollution levels and health risks Stripping down sustainability assessments for easier comparison of innovative recycling options Enhancing performance of construction waste management: Factor analysis from the building contractors’ perspectives Food waste separation intention among the residential students: Moderation role of university support
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1