Which executive functions affect text comprehension and writing in paper and digital mode? An investigation in primary school children

IF 8.9 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Education Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104936
Costanza Ruffini, Christian Tarchi, Chiara Pecini
{"title":"Which executive functions affect text comprehension and writing in paper and digital mode? An investigation in primary school children","authors":"Costanza Ruffini,&nbsp;Christian Tarchi,&nbsp;Chiara Pecini","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The scientific literature supports the hypothesis of a disadvantage in students' performances when learning tasks are conducted in the digital mode in comparison to the paper one. Some studies suggest the need of investigating the role of individual cognitive functioning in digital reading and writing with special attention to those cognitive processes, such as Executive Functions (EF), which are acknowledged to control and affect learning and school adaptation. The present study aimed to: 1) investigate the differences in performances between paper and digital modalities in text reading and text writing in primary grade students; 2) analyse whether EF predict performances in paper and digital modalities; 3) explore whether any differences between paper and digital text comprehension or writing can be differently explained by EF depending on the children's learning performances. 175 typically developing Grades 3–5 students performed text comprehension and text writing tasks on computer and on paper and were assessed with EF tasks tapping inhibitory control, working memory and cognitive flexibility. The results showed no performance differences between digital and paper tasks at the group level apart from a higher text length in the digital than paper mode. However, children with low performances at the comprehension and writing tasks benefited more from the digital than the paper mode, in comparison to high performers that showed the opposite pattern. Additionally, low performers scored worse than high performers in most of the EF tasks. Lastly, working memory explained the digital-paper difference in text comprehension among low comprehenders as well as cognitive flexibility explained the difference in level of narrative complexity and number of words among low writers.</p><p>The results suggest the benefit of the digital mode for low readers and writers and highlight the role of the main components of EF in reading and writing in both paper and digital modes in primary school.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"207 ","pages":"Article 104936"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131523002130","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The scientific literature supports the hypothesis of a disadvantage in students' performances when learning tasks are conducted in the digital mode in comparison to the paper one. Some studies suggest the need of investigating the role of individual cognitive functioning in digital reading and writing with special attention to those cognitive processes, such as Executive Functions (EF), which are acknowledged to control and affect learning and school adaptation. The present study aimed to: 1) investigate the differences in performances between paper and digital modalities in text reading and text writing in primary grade students; 2) analyse whether EF predict performances in paper and digital modalities; 3) explore whether any differences between paper and digital text comprehension or writing can be differently explained by EF depending on the children's learning performances. 175 typically developing Grades 3–5 students performed text comprehension and text writing tasks on computer and on paper and were assessed with EF tasks tapping inhibitory control, working memory and cognitive flexibility. The results showed no performance differences between digital and paper tasks at the group level apart from a higher text length in the digital than paper mode. However, children with low performances at the comprehension and writing tasks benefited more from the digital than the paper mode, in comparison to high performers that showed the opposite pattern. Additionally, low performers scored worse than high performers in most of the EF tasks. Lastly, working memory explained the digital-paper difference in text comprehension among low comprehenders as well as cognitive flexibility explained the difference in level of narrative complexity and number of words among low writers.

The results suggest the benefit of the digital mode for low readers and writers and highlight the role of the main components of EF in reading and writing in both paper and digital modes in primary school.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在纸质和数字模式下,哪些执行功能会影响文本理解和写作?对小学生的调查
科学文献支持这样一种假设,即与论文相比,在数字模式下进行学习任务时,学生的表现处于劣势。一些研究表明,有必要调查个人认知功能在数字阅读和写作中的作用,特别关注那些认知过程,如执行功能,这些认知过程被认为控制和影响学习和学校适应。本研究旨在:1)调查小学学生在文本阅读和文本写作中,纸质和数字模式表现的差异;2) 分析EF是否可以预测纸质和数字模式的性能;3) 探究EF是否可以根据孩子的学习表现对纸质文本和数字文本理解或写作之间的差异做出不同的解释。175名典型发展中的3-5年级学生在计算机和纸上完成了文本理解和文本写作任务,并通过EF任务对抑制性控制、工作记忆和认知灵活性进行了评估。结果显示,除了数字模式下的文本长度高于纸质模式外,数字任务和纸质任务在小组层面的表现没有差异。然而,与表现出相反模式的高表现儿童相比,在理解和写作任务中表现不佳的儿童从数字模式中受益更多,而不是纸质模式。此外,在大多数EF任务中,表现较差的人得分低于表现较好的人。最后,工作记忆解释了低理解者在文本理解方面的数字论文差异,认知灵活性解释了低作者在叙事复杂性和字数方面的差异。研究结果表明,数字模式对低读者和低作者有好处,并强调了EF的主要组成部分在小学纸质和数字模式下的阅读和写作中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
期刊最新文献
Unpacking help-seeking process through multimodal learning analytics: A comparative study of ChatGPT vs Human expert A meta-analysis on the effect of technology on the achievement of less advantaged students Personalization in educational gamification: Learners with different trait competitiveness benefit differently from rankings on leaderboards Plugging in at school: Do schools nurture digital skills and narrow digital skills inequality? Reducing interpretative ambiguity in an educational environment with ChatGPT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1