Biochemical characterization and discrimination of Leishmania major parasites and infected macrophages with Raman spectroscopy and chemometrics

Thulya Chakkumpulakkal Puthan Veettil , Rebekah N. Duffin , Supti Roy , Philip C. Andrews , Bayden R. Wood
{"title":"Biochemical characterization and discrimination of Leishmania major parasites and infected macrophages with Raman spectroscopy and chemometrics","authors":"Thulya Chakkumpulakkal Puthan Veettil ,&nbsp;Rebekah N. Duffin ,&nbsp;Supti Roy ,&nbsp;Philip C. Andrews ,&nbsp;Bayden R. Wood","doi":"10.1016/j.clispe.2023.100024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Leishmaniasis is classified as one of the neglected tropical disease (NTD), which are caused by a group of parasitic protozoans called <em>Leishmania.</em> The high case load and severity of the disease make Leishmaniasis second only to malaria in terms of both severity and infectivity. However, due to the low economic interest in research and development, it may become a major world-wide health threat. Current diagnostics including serological assessment of infected tissue by either light microscopy, or antibody tests or by the culturing of potential infection via <em>in vitro</em> or <em>in vivo</em> animal inoculation, parasitological tests using samples aspirated from the spleen and bone marrow, Immunological tests such as the Montenegro test, Fluorescence assays, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques are suffer from several limitations including time and expense. Herein, we first apply Raman microscopy to distinguish the two <em>L. Major</em> parasitic forms namely promastigotes and amastigotes and secondly, distinguish infected from non-infected macrophages using multivariate data analysis including Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and unsupervised hierarchical cluster imaging analysis (UHCA). The maximum variance between infected and uninfected macrophage groups are visible in the lipid region (92.20 %) as compared to the fingerprint region (46.13 %) along PC1. The contributions from nucleic acids can be found at 805 cm<sup>−1</sup> (phosphodiester - Z-marker), 767 cm<sup>−1</sup> (pyrimidine ring breathing mode), 742 cm<sup>−1</sup> (ring breathing mode of DNA/RNA bases), and 568 cm<sup>−1</sup> (cytosine/guanine). These amplified nucleic acid signals in infected macrophages indicate the presence of infection compared to the uninfected macrophage group. Similarly, the maximum variance between amastigotes and promastigotes groups are observed in the lipid region (88.45%) as compared to the fingerprint region (28.34 %). Moreover, the UHCA of infected macrophages revealed the accumulation of lipid bodies or droplets inside or close proximity parasitophorous vacuole, which is consistent with the reported literature. Once established macrophages were infected with <em>Leishmania in vitro</em> and the differences between infected and non-infected established with high reproducibility. The reported spectral differences between infected and non-infected macrophages lays the ground work for developing a diagnostic tool for detection of leishmaniasis in a buffy coat preparation and also offers the potential of monitoring the effects of new therapeutics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100277,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spectroscopy","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100024"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spectroscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666054723000017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Leishmaniasis is classified as one of the neglected tropical disease (NTD), which are caused by a group of parasitic protozoans called Leishmania. The high case load and severity of the disease make Leishmaniasis second only to malaria in terms of both severity and infectivity. However, due to the low economic interest in research and development, it may become a major world-wide health threat. Current diagnostics including serological assessment of infected tissue by either light microscopy, or antibody tests or by the culturing of potential infection via in vitro or in vivo animal inoculation, parasitological tests using samples aspirated from the spleen and bone marrow, Immunological tests such as the Montenegro test, Fluorescence assays, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques are suffer from several limitations including time and expense. Herein, we first apply Raman microscopy to distinguish the two L. Major parasitic forms namely promastigotes and amastigotes and secondly, distinguish infected from non-infected macrophages using multivariate data analysis including Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and unsupervised hierarchical cluster imaging analysis (UHCA). The maximum variance between infected and uninfected macrophage groups are visible in the lipid region (92.20 %) as compared to the fingerprint region (46.13 %) along PC1. The contributions from nucleic acids can be found at 805 cm−1 (phosphodiester - Z-marker), 767 cm−1 (pyrimidine ring breathing mode), 742 cm−1 (ring breathing mode of DNA/RNA bases), and 568 cm−1 (cytosine/guanine). These amplified nucleic acid signals in infected macrophages indicate the presence of infection compared to the uninfected macrophage group. Similarly, the maximum variance between amastigotes and promastigotes groups are observed in the lipid region (88.45%) as compared to the fingerprint region (28.34 %). Moreover, the UHCA of infected macrophages revealed the accumulation of lipid bodies or droplets inside or close proximity parasitophorous vacuole, which is consistent with the reported literature. Once established macrophages were infected with Leishmania in vitro and the differences between infected and non-infected established with high reproducibility. The reported spectral differences between infected and non-infected macrophages lays the ground work for developing a diagnostic tool for detection of leishmaniasis in a buffy coat preparation and also offers the potential of monitoring the effects of new therapeutics.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用拉曼光谱和化学计量学对利什曼原虫主要寄生虫和感染巨噬细胞的生化特征和鉴别
利什曼病是一种被忽视的热带疾病,由一组寄生原生动物利什曼原虫引起。该疾病的高病例数和严重程度使利什曼病在严重程度和传染性方面仅次于疟疾。然而,由于对研究和开发的经济兴趣较低,它可能会成为世界范围内的主要健康威胁。目前的诊断包括通过光学显微镜或抗体测试或通过体外或体内动物接种培养潜在感染对感染组织进行血清学评估,使用从脾脏和骨髓抽取的样本进行寄生虫学测试,免疫学测试如黑山测试,荧光测定,并且聚合酶链式反应(PCR)技术受到包括时间和费用在内的若干限制。在此,我们首先应用拉曼显微镜来区分两种主要寄生形式,即前鞭毛体和无鞭毛体,其次,使用包括主成分分析(PCA)和无监督分级聚类成像分析(UHCA)在内的多变量数据分析来区分感染和未感染的巨噬细胞。与沿着PC1的指纹区(46.13%)相比,感染和未感染巨噬细胞组之间的最大差异在脂质区(92.20%)可见。核酸的贡献可以在805 cm−1(磷酸二酯-Z标记)、767 cm−2(嘧啶环呼吸模式)、742 cm−3(脱氧核糖核酸/核糖核酸碱基的环状呼吸模式)和568 cm−4(胞嘧啶/鸟嘌呤)处发现。与未感染的巨噬细胞组相比,感染的巨噬细胞中这些扩增的核酸信号表明存在感染。类似地,与指纹区(28.34%)相比,在脂质区(88.45%)观察到无鞭毛体和前鞭毛体组之间的最大差异。此外,感染巨噬细胞的UHCA显示脂质体或液滴在寄生液泡内或附近积聚,这与报道的文献一致。一旦建立的巨噬细胞在体外感染利什曼原虫,并且感染和未感染之间的差异具有高再现性。据报道,感染和未感染巨噬细胞之间的光谱差异为开发一种诊断工具来检测血沉棕皮制剂中的利什曼病奠定了基础,也为监测新疗法的效果提供了潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Validated differentiation of Listeria monocytogenes serogroups by FTIR spectroscopy using an Artificial Neural Network based classifier in an accredited official food control laboratory Rapid detection of heart failure using a spectroscopic liquid biopsy Raman spectroscopic analysis of human serum samples of convalescing COVID-19 positive patients Application of optical spectroscopy in diagnosing and monitoring breast cancers: A technical review Deep UV resonance Raman spectroscopy for sensitive detection and quantification of the fluoroquinolone antibiotic drug moxifloxacin and the β-lactam meropenem in human plasma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1