Conditioned pain modulation and analgesia of local acupuncture for chronic musculoskeletal pain: An exploratory study

Dawn Wong Lit Wan , Yanyi Wang , Lester Jones , Zhen Zheng
{"title":"Conditioned pain modulation and analgesia of local acupuncture for chronic musculoskeletal pain: An exploratory study","authors":"Dawn Wong Lit Wan ,&nbsp;Yanyi Wang ,&nbsp;Lester Jones ,&nbsp;Zhen Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.bbii.2023.100028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) has been found to be inefficient in patients with chronic pain. Animal and human studies showed that CPM is involved in acupuncture analgesia. This study explored the relationship between the potency of CPM and the extent of acupuncture analgesia.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Thirty-five (35) participants with chronic non-specific low back pain or knee osteoarthritis were given sessions of acupuncture treatment at the pain sites twice per week for four weeks. Participants were asked to complete a diary, before and after the treatment, to monitor changes in clinical pain intensity, daily pain duration and analgesic intake. The potency of CPM was assessed before and after the treatment course. Correlation between potency of CPM and extent of acupuncture analgesia was analysed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Clinical average pain intensity (0.79 ± 1.09, p &lt; 0.01), daily pain duration (1.45 ± 3.77 hr, p = 0.03) and analgesic intake (1.41 ± 3.96, p = 0.04) decreased significantly after treatment, while potency of CPM increased significantly (18.21 ± 49.94%, p = 0.04). Pearson correlations showed those with less efficient baseline CPM presented with better pain reduction after treatment. Those with less efficient baseline CPM were associated with greater improvement in potency of CPM after treatment (r = 0.60, p &lt; 0.01). There was no association between the change in potency of CPM and the change in clinical pain intensity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Individuals have varied acupuncture analgesia. People with less efficient baseline CPM would likely benefit from local acupuncture with greater pain relief and improved potency of CPM. Larger studies with a control arm are needed to confirm these results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100197,"journal":{"name":"Brain Behavior and Immunity Integrative","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Behavior and Immunity Integrative","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949834123000272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) has been found to be inefficient in patients with chronic pain. Animal and human studies showed that CPM is involved in acupuncture analgesia. This study explored the relationship between the potency of CPM and the extent of acupuncture analgesia.

Materials and methods

Thirty-five (35) participants with chronic non-specific low back pain or knee osteoarthritis were given sessions of acupuncture treatment at the pain sites twice per week for four weeks. Participants were asked to complete a diary, before and after the treatment, to monitor changes in clinical pain intensity, daily pain duration and analgesic intake. The potency of CPM was assessed before and after the treatment course. Correlation between potency of CPM and extent of acupuncture analgesia was analysed.

Results

Clinical average pain intensity (0.79 ± 1.09, p < 0.01), daily pain duration (1.45 ± 3.77 hr, p = 0.03) and analgesic intake (1.41 ± 3.96, p = 0.04) decreased significantly after treatment, while potency of CPM increased significantly (18.21 ± 49.94%, p = 0.04). Pearson correlations showed those with less efficient baseline CPM presented with better pain reduction after treatment. Those with less efficient baseline CPM were associated with greater improvement in potency of CPM after treatment (r = 0.60, p < 0.01). There was no association between the change in potency of CPM and the change in clinical pain intensity.

Conclusions

Individuals have varied acupuncture analgesia. People with less efficient baseline CPM would likely benefit from local acupuncture with greater pain relief and improved potency of CPM. Larger studies with a control arm are needed to confirm these results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部针灸治疗慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的条件疼痛调节和镇痛:一项探索性研究
客观条件疼痛调节(CPM)已被发现在慢性疼痛患者中效率低下。动物和人体研究表明CPM与针刺镇痛有关。本研究探讨了CPM的药效与针刺镇痛程度的关系。材料和方法对35名患有慢性非特异性腰痛或膝骨关节炎的参与者在疼痛部位进行针刺治疗,每周两次,持续四周。参与者被要求在治疗前后完成日记,以监测临床疼痛强度、每日疼痛持续时间和止痛药摄入的变化。在疗程前后评估CPM的效力。分析了CPM的药效与针刺镇痛程度的相关性。结果临床平均疼痛强度(0.79±1.09,p<0.01)、日疼痛持续时间(1.45±3.77小时,p=0.03)和镇痛药摄入量(1.41±3.96,p=0.04)在治疗后显著下降,而CPM的效力显著增加(18.21±49.94%,p=0.04)。Pearson相关性显示,基线CPM效率较低的患者在治疗后疼痛减轻效果较好。那些基线CPM效率较低的患者在治疗后CPM的效力有更大的改善(r=0.60,p<0.01)。CPM效力的变化与临床疼痛强度的变化之间没有关联。结论个体具有不同的针刺镇痛作用。基线CPM效率较低的人可能会从局部针灸中受益,从而更好地缓解疼痛并提高CPM的效力。需要对对照组进行更大规模的研究来证实这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The association between c-reactive protein and human brain microstructure: A systematic review of diffusion imaging studies Pharmacology of natural bioactive compounds used for management of Huntington diseases: An overview Inflammatory biomarker findings from a randomized controlled trial of heated yoga for depression Effect of leech therapy in dermatophytosis: A randomized standard controlled trial Role of plant-derived compounds in immune enhancement against uncontrollable cell proliferation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1