Delaying sowing of cover crops decreases the ability to reduce nitrate leaching

IF 6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2023.108598
Uttam Kumar, Ingrid Kaag Thomsen, Jørgen Eriksen, Iris Vogeler, Maarit Mäenpää, Elly Møller Hansen
{"title":"Delaying sowing of cover crops decreases the ability to reduce nitrate leaching","authors":"Uttam Kumar,&nbsp;Ingrid Kaag Thomsen,&nbsp;Jørgen Eriksen,&nbsp;Iris Vogeler,&nbsp;Maarit Mäenpää,&nbsp;Elly Møller Hansen","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2023.108598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Under favorable growth conditions cover crops are efficient tools to scavenge available nitrogen in the soil after the main crop and reduce nitrate leaching. However, their ability to reduce nitrate leaching is influenced by the available growth conditions after sowing and their characteristics to assimilate biomass and nitrogen (N). A flexible sowing time of cover crops without compromising their benefits to the environment implies knowledge of how the growth conditions after sowing of the cover crop affect leaching. Fodder radish, phacelia, and oats have different growth and N uptake characteristics, and their ability to reduce nitrate leaching depending on growth conditions after sowing may therefore differ. In this study, these three cover crops were evaluated, and their ability for taking up soil N and reducing nitrate leaching was quantified based on four sowing times from early August to early September with intervals of 7–11 days in 2019, 2020, and 2021 in Denmark. N uptake was measured in autumn each year and nitrate leaching measurements took place during the drainage period until the following spring. The N uptake decreased with subsequent sowing times across the cover crops and years. However, the decrease was different in different cover crops and different years. Nitrate leaching reduction also decreased with subsequent sowing times. On average, fodder radish reduced nitrate leaching by 64 kg N ha<sup>-1</sup>, significantly more than phacelia and oats with 47 and 44 kg N ha<sup>-1</sup>, respectively, across all sowing times and drainage periods. With an average reduction of nitrate leaching of 0.8 kg N ha<sup>-1</sup> per day and no interaction of N uptake and cover crops, the ability of fodder radish, phacelia, and oats to reduce nitrate leaching was not significantly different. Fodder radish and early sowing was the most effective combination to obtain the maximum benefits of nitrate leaching reduction by a cover crop.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"355 ","pages":"Article 108598"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880923002578","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Under favorable growth conditions cover crops are efficient tools to scavenge available nitrogen in the soil after the main crop and reduce nitrate leaching. However, their ability to reduce nitrate leaching is influenced by the available growth conditions after sowing and their characteristics to assimilate biomass and nitrogen (N). A flexible sowing time of cover crops without compromising their benefits to the environment implies knowledge of how the growth conditions after sowing of the cover crop affect leaching. Fodder radish, phacelia, and oats have different growth and N uptake characteristics, and their ability to reduce nitrate leaching depending on growth conditions after sowing may therefore differ. In this study, these three cover crops were evaluated, and their ability for taking up soil N and reducing nitrate leaching was quantified based on four sowing times from early August to early September with intervals of 7–11 days in 2019, 2020, and 2021 in Denmark. N uptake was measured in autumn each year and nitrate leaching measurements took place during the drainage period until the following spring. The N uptake decreased with subsequent sowing times across the cover crops and years. However, the decrease was different in different cover crops and different years. Nitrate leaching reduction also decreased with subsequent sowing times. On average, fodder radish reduced nitrate leaching by 64 kg N ha-1, significantly more than phacelia and oats with 47 and 44 kg N ha-1, respectively, across all sowing times and drainage periods. With an average reduction of nitrate leaching of 0.8 kg N ha-1 per day and no interaction of N uptake and cover crops, the ability of fodder radish, phacelia, and oats to reduce nitrate leaching was not significantly different. Fodder radish and early sowing was the most effective combination to obtain the maximum benefits of nitrate leaching reduction by a cover crop.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
延迟覆盖作物的播种降低了减少硝酸盐淋失的能力
在有利的生长条件下,覆盖作物是清除主要作物后土壤中有效氮和减少硝酸盐浸出的有效工具。然而,它们减少硝酸盐浸出的能力受到播种后可用生长条件及其同化生物量和氮(N)的特性的影响。在不损害覆盖作物对环境的益处的情况下,覆盖作物的灵活播种时间意味着了解覆盖作物播种后的生长条件如何影响浸出。饲料萝卜、菌丝体和燕麦具有不同的生长和氮吸收特性,因此,根据播种后的生长条件,它们减少硝酸盐浸出的能力可能不同。在这项研究中,对这三种覆盖作物进行了评估,并根据丹麦2019年、2020年和2021年8月初至9月初的四次播种时间(间隔7-11天)对它们吸收土壤氮和减少硝酸盐浸出的能力进行了量化。氮吸收量在每年秋季进行测量,硝酸盐浸出量在排水期进行测量,直到第二年春天。氮吸收量随覆盖作物的播种时间和年份的增加而减少。然而,不同覆盖作物和不同年份的降幅不同。硝酸盐浸出率也随着播种时间的延长而降低。在所有播种时间和排水期,饲料萝卜平均减少了64 kg N ha-1的硝酸盐浸出量,显著高于分期播种和燕麦分别减少了47和44 kg N ha-。在平均每天减少0.8 kg N ha-1的硝酸盐浸出量,并且N吸收和覆盖作物没有相互作用的情况下,饲料萝卜、菌丝体和燕麦减少硝酸盐浸出的能力没有显著差异。覆盖作物减少硝酸盐淋失的效益最大的组合是饲料萝卜和早播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
期刊最新文献
Agricultural land use modulates responses of soil biota and multifunctionality to increased antibiotic pressures Temperate grasslands under climate extremes: Effects of plant diversity on ecosystem services Phosphorus leaching in high-P soils under maize silage and interseeding cover crop system Trade-offs and synergies of food-water-land benefits for crop rotation optimization in Northeast China Water and sediment regulation eluting and washland planting lead to nitrogen increase in the lower reaches of the Yellow River
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1