FinTech and SMEs financing: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis

Bahati Sanga , Meshach Aziakpono
{"title":"FinTech and SMEs financing: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis","authors":"Bahati Sanga ,&nbsp;Meshach Aziakpono","doi":"10.1016/j.digbus.2023.100067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face obstacles in raising capital and accessing financial services due to information asymmetry, high transaction costs and lack of collateral. FinTech developments have made gathering and sharing information easier, changed how funds are mobilized and allocated, and increased capital-raising activities. This paper conducts a systematic literature review on FinTech and SME financing for the period 2008–2022. So far there are unstructured and separate publications on this topic. Therefore, there is a need to consolidate the empirical research and their findings on the effectiveness of FinTech in meeting SMEs' financing needs. The bibliometric findings show that few studies on FinTech and SME financing are empirical in nature. These empirical studies surged a decade later after FinTech 3.0 started in 2008, with the majority of them using quantitative methods based on data from surveys and FinTech platforms. Furthermore, emerging alternative digital financing to SMEs have attracted more empirical studies than those on FinTech and bank lending to SMEs. In terms of publications, China is dominating, followed by the United States. The content analysis shows that FinTech has increased the ability of financial and non-financial institutions to collect and process accurate information about SMEs, thus reducing information asymmetry and transaction costs. FinTech has also increased the speed and quality of the lending cycle, from establishing an SME pipeline, collecting and processing information, to loan screening, monitoring and repayment. Finally, the paper presents research gaps and areas for future studies, challenges and policy recommendations on this novel subject.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100376,"journal":{"name":"Digital Business","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100067"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666954423000157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face obstacles in raising capital and accessing financial services due to information asymmetry, high transaction costs and lack of collateral. FinTech developments have made gathering and sharing information easier, changed how funds are mobilized and allocated, and increased capital-raising activities. This paper conducts a systematic literature review on FinTech and SME financing for the period 2008–2022. So far there are unstructured and separate publications on this topic. Therefore, there is a need to consolidate the empirical research and their findings on the effectiveness of FinTech in meeting SMEs' financing needs. The bibliometric findings show that few studies on FinTech and SME financing are empirical in nature. These empirical studies surged a decade later after FinTech 3.0 started in 2008, with the majority of them using quantitative methods based on data from surveys and FinTech platforms. Furthermore, emerging alternative digital financing to SMEs have attracted more empirical studies than those on FinTech and bank lending to SMEs. In terms of publications, China is dominating, followed by the United States. The content analysis shows that FinTech has increased the ability of financial and non-financial institutions to collect and process accurate information about SMEs, thus reducing information asymmetry and transaction costs. FinTech has also increased the speed and quality of the lending cycle, from establishing an SME pipeline, collecting and processing information, to loan screening, monitoring and repayment. Finally, the paper presents research gaps and areas for future studies, challenges and policy recommendations on this novel subject.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金融科技与中小企业融资:系统文献综述与文献计量分析
由于信息不对称、交易成本高和缺乏抵押品,中小企业在筹集资金和获得金融服务方面面临障碍。金融科技的发展使信息的收集和共享变得更加容易,改变了资金的调动和分配方式,并增加了资本筹集活动。本文对2008-2012年期间金融科技和中小企业融资进行了系统的文献综述。到目前为止,关于这个主题的出版物都是非结构化的和独立的。因此,有必要整合金融科技在满足中小企业融资需求方面的有效性的实证研究及其发现。文献计量学研究结果表明,很少有关于金融科技和中小企业融资的研究是实证性质的。这些实证研究在2008年FinTech 3.0启动十年后激增,其中大多数使用了基于调查和FinTech平台数据的定量方法。此外,新兴的中小企业替代数字融资吸引了比金融科技和中小企业银行贷款更多的实证研究。在出版物方面,中国占主导地位,其次是美国。内容分析表明,金融科技提高了金融和非金融机构收集和处理中小企业准确信息的能力,从而降低了信息不对称和交易成本。金融科技还提高了贷款周期的速度和质量,从建立中小企业管道、收集和处理信息,到贷款筛选、监控和还款。最后,本文介绍了这一新课题的研究空白和未来研究领域、挑战和政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Building digital platform ecosystems: A synthetization of fundamental design topics from a literature review Realising value from big data analytics: The process of affordance actualisation Sequential film marketing in China: The study of social platforms and their impacts Understanding determinants of digital transformation and digitizing management functions in incumbent SMEs Reinvestment intentions in cryptocurrency: Examining the dynamics of risks and investor risk tolerance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1