Effect of seepage on soil arching effect in deep shield tunnel

IF 8.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Underground Space Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.undsp.2023.02.011
Xu Song, Fan-Yan Meng, Ren-Peng Chen, Han-Lin Wang, Huai-Na Wu
{"title":"Effect of seepage on soil arching effect in deep shield tunnel","authors":"Xu Song,&nbsp;Fan-Yan Meng,&nbsp;Ren-Peng Chen,&nbsp;Han-Lin Wang,&nbsp;Huai-Na Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.undsp.2023.02.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Shield tunneling and post-tunneling steady seepage are accompanied by stress and displacement variations, which could induce and influence the soil arching effect. Although there are many studies on the tunneling-induced soil arching effect, the research about the effect of seepage on soil arching effect is extremely lacking. In this study, a numerical model is firstly established and verified by field data. Then, a series of numerical models, whose simulation method of steady seepage is verified by adopting the conformal mapping technique, are established to study the soil arching evolution of deep-buried tunneling and post-construction steady seepage. The results indicate that seepage leads to an increase in effective vertical stress, which is consistent with the existing theory. The seepage weakens the soil arching effect resulting in the height of the arch zone reducing from 2.38<em>D</em> (<em>D</em> is the tunnel diameter) to 1.25<em>D</em>. The seepage leads to the further development of ground consolidation settlement, but the differential displacement in the soil mass decreases. The ground reaction curve in the steady seepage condition shows a bigger value than that after excavation. It is reasonable to control the ground loss ratio in the range of 0.5–1.0%, which can minimize overburden pressure with moderate ground deformation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48505,"journal":{"name":"Underground Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Underground Space","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467967423000570","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Shield tunneling and post-tunneling steady seepage are accompanied by stress and displacement variations, which could induce and influence the soil arching effect. Although there are many studies on the tunneling-induced soil arching effect, the research about the effect of seepage on soil arching effect is extremely lacking. In this study, a numerical model is firstly established and verified by field data. Then, a series of numerical models, whose simulation method of steady seepage is verified by adopting the conformal mapping technique, are established to study the soil arching evolution of deep-buried tunneling and post-construction steady seepage. The results indicate that seepage leads to an increase in effective vertical stress, which is consistent with the existing theory. The seepage weakens the soil arching effect resulting in the height of the arch zone reducing from 2.38D (D is the tunnel diameter) to 1.25D. The seepage leads to the further development of ground consolidation settlement, but the differential displacement in the soil mass decreases. The ground reaction curve in the steady seepage condition shows a bigger value than that after excavation. It is reasonable to control the ground loss ratio in the range of 0.5–1.0%, which can minimize overburden pressure with moderate ground deformation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
渗流对深埋盾构隧道土拱效应的影响
盾构施工和隧道开挖后的稳定渗流都伴随着应力和位移的变化,从而诱发和影响土拱效应。尽管关于隧道开挖引起的土拱效应的研究很多,但关于渗流对土拱效应影响的研究却非常缺乏。本研究首先建立了一个数值模型,并通过现场数据进行了验证。然后,建立了一系列数值模型,采用保角映射技术验证了稳定渗流的模拟方法,研究了深埋隧道土拱的演变和施工后的稳定渗流。结果表明,渗流导致有效垂直应力增加,这与现有理论一致。渗流削弱了土拱效应,导致拱区高度从2.38D(D为隧道直径)降至1.25D。渗流导致地基固结沉降的进一步发展,但土体中的差异位移减小。稳定渗流条件下的地面反应曲线显示出比开挖后更大的值。将地面损失率控制在0.5–1.0%范围内是合理的,这可以在适度的地面变形的情况下最大限度地减小覆盖层压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Underground Space
Underground Space ENGINEERING, CIVIL-
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Underground Space is an open access international journal without article processing charges (APC) committed to serving as a scientific forum for researchers and practitioners in the field of underground engineering. The journal welcomes manuscripts that deal with original theories, methods, technologies, and important applications throughout the life-cycle of underground projects, including planning, design, operation and maintenance, disaster prevention, and demolition. The journal is particularly interested in manuscripts related to the latest development of smart underground engineering from the perspectives of resilience, resources saving, environmental friendliness, humanity, and artificial intelligence. The manuscripts are expected to have significant innovation and potential impact in the field of underground engineering, and should have clear association with or application in underground projects.
期刊最新文献
Detecting soil mixing, grain size distribution, and clogging potential of tunnel excavation face by classification-regression algorithms using EPBM operational data Experimental study on mechanical behavior and countermeasures of mountain tunnels under strike-slip fault movement RM2D: An automated and robust laser-based framework for mobile tunnel deformation detection Lightweight defocus deblurring network for curved-tunnel line scanning using wide-angle lenses Grain-based coupled thermo-mechanical modeling for stressed heterogeneous granite under thermal shock
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1