Molecular characterization and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of bacterial strains isolated from diabetic foot ulcers

Dilawar Khan , Muhammad Zeb , Sabir Khan Khattak , Asim Ali Shah , Mehtab Abdullah , Muhammad Bilal
{"title":"Molecular characterization and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of bacterial strains isolated from diabetic foot ulcers","authors":"Dilawar Khan ,&nbsp;Muhammad Zeb ,&nbsp;Sabir Khan Khattak ,&nbsp;Asim Ali Shah ,&nbsp;Mehtab Abdullah ,&nbsp;Muhammad Bilal","doi":"10.1016/j.endmts.2023.100136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Diabetic wounds are highly susceptible to a range of pathogens, particularly bacteria, due to the immunocompromised state of diabetic patients. Although diabetic wound isolates are typically polymicrobial, <em>S. aureus</em> is the most common bacteria found in such isolates.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objectives of this study were to identify the different bacterial isolates present in each sample of diabetic foot ulcers, determine the minimum inhibitory concentration of the identified bacterial strains to various antibiotics, and identify the genes responsible for drug resistance in multidrug-resistant bacterial strains.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional prospective study was conducted at the Endocrinology Unit, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan, from November 2019 to March 2020. A total of n = 140 samples from diabetic foot ulcers were aseptically collected and evaluated for their sensitivity to antibacterial drugs commonly used in the study area. The samples were inoculated into various media and cultured, and biochemical and molecular analyses were conducted according to the Clinical Laboratory Institute Guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 122 bacterial isolates were obtained out of a total of 144. The results of antibiotics susceptibility testing showed that gram-positive isolates were more resistant to penicillin G (93.18 %), but exhibited sensitivity to vancomycin (100 %) and linezolid (LZD) (95 %). Gram-negative isolates were found to be 100 % resistant to penicillin, such as amoxicillin (AMC), and sulphonamides, such as sulphamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SXT) groups of antibiotics. A total of 36 (29.50 %) multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates were identified. MDR isolates exhibited good sensitivity to meronem (MEM), i.e. 97 %, and were highly resistant to sulphamethoxazole/trimethoprim and clindamycin, i.e. 100 %.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Gram-positive isolates were resistant to penicillin G (93.18 %) but sensitive to vancomycin (100 %) and linezolid (95 %). Gram-negative isolates were resistant to penicillin and sulphonamides. Among the isolates, 29.50 % were multidrug-resistant (MDR), with high resistance to sulphamethoxazole/trimethoprim and clindamycin but good sensitivity to meronem (97 %).</p></div><div><h3>Two sentence summary</h3><p>This study highlights the emerging problem that world is facing right now in the form of antimicrobial resistance.</p><p>Our study showed increased antimicrobial resistance in wounds of diabetic foot ulcers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34427,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine and Metabolic Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine and Metabolic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666396123000134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Diabetic wounds are highly susceptible to a range of pathogens, particularly bacteria, due to the immunocompromised state of diabetic patients. Although diabetic wound isolates are typically polymicrobial, S. aureus is the most common bacteria found in such isolates.

Objective

The objectives of this study were to identify the different bacterial isolates present in each sample of diabetic foot ulcers, determine the minimum inhibitory concentration of the identified bacterial strains to various antibiotics, and identify the genes responsible for drug resistance in multidrug-resistant bacterial strains.

Materials and methods

A cross-sectional prospective study was conducted at the Endocrinology Unit, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan, from November 2019 to March 2020. A total of n = 140 samples from diabetic foot ulcers were aseptically collected and evaluated for their sensitivity to antibacterial drugs commonly used in the study area. The samples were inoculated into various media and cultured, and biochemical and molecular analyses were conducted according to the Clinical Laboratory Institute Guidelines.

Results

A total of 122 bacterial isolates were obtained out of a total of 144. The results of antibiotics susceptibility testing showed that gram-positive isolates were more resistant to penicillin G (93.18 %), but exhibited sensitivity to vancomycin (100 %) and linezolid (LZD) (95 %). Gram-negative isolates were found to be 100 % resistant to penicillin, such as amoxicillin (AMC), and sulphonamides, such as sulphamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SXT) groups of antibiotics. A total of 36 (29.50 %) multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates were identified. MDR isolates exhibited good sensitivity to meronem (MEM), i.e. 97 %, and were highly resistant to sulphamethoxazole/trimethoprim and clindamycin, i.e. 100 %.

Conclusion

Gram-positive isolates were resistant to penicillin G (93.18 %) but sensitive to vancomycin (100 %) and linezolid (95 %). Gram-negative isolates were resistant to penicillin and sulphonamides. Among the isolates, 29.50 % were multidrug-resistant (MDR), with high resistance to sulphamethoxazole/trimethoprim and clindamycin but good sensitivity to meronem (97 %).

Two sentence summary

This study highlights the emerging problem that world is facing right now in the form of antimicrobial resistance.

Our study showed increased antimicrobial resistance in wounds of diabetic foot ulcers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖尿病足溃疡分离菌株的分子特征及药敏模式
引言由于糖尿病患者的免疫功能低下,糖尿病伤口对一系列病原体特别是细菌非常敏感。尽管糖尿病伤口分离株通常是多微生物的,但金黄色葡萄球菌是此类分离株中最常见的细菌。目的本研究的目的是鉴定每个糖尿病足溃疡样本中存在的不同菌株,确定所鉴定菌株对各种抗生素的最小抑制浓度,并鉴定耐多药菌株中导致耐药性的基因。材料和方法2019年11月至2020年3月,在巴基斯坦白沙瓦哈亚塔巴德医疗中心内分泌科进行了一项横断面前瞻性研究。共收集了140个糖尿病足溃疡样本,并对其对研究区域常用抗菌药物的敏感性进行了评估。将样品接种到各种培养基中并进行培养,并根据临床实验室研究所指南进行生化和分子分析。结果从144株细菌中分离得到122株。药敏试验结果表明,革兰氏阳性菌株对青霉素G的耐药性较高(93.18%),但对万古霉素(100%)和利奈唑胺(LZD)的敏感性较高(95%)。革兰氏阴性分离株被发现对青霉素(如阿莫西林(AMC))和磺酰胺(如磺胺甲恶唑/甲氧苄啶(SXT)组抗生素具有100%的耐药性。共鉴定出36株(29.50%)耐多药菌株。耐多药菌株对美罗烯(MEM)具有良好的敏感性,即97%,对磺胺甲恶唑/甲氧苄啶和克林霉素具有高度耐药性,即100%。结论革兰阳性菌株对青霉素G耐药率为93.18%,对万古霉素和利奈唑胺敏感率为100%。革兰氏阴性菌株对青霉素和磺酰胺类药物具有耐药性。在分离株中,29.50%为多药耐药性(MDR),对磺胺甲恶唑/甲氧苄啶和克林霉素具有较高的耐药性,但对美罗烯具有良好的敏感性(97%)。这项研究强调了世界目前面临的新问题,即抗微生物耐药性。我们的研究表明,糖尿病足溃疡伤口的抗菌药物耐药性增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endocrine and Metabolic Science
Endocrine and Metabolic Science Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
84 days
期刊最新文献
Long-term diabetic hyperglycaemia modifies social behaviour in rats Platelet activation and inflammation in transgender women using hormone therapy Prevalence of thyroid dysfunction among pregnant women in the horn of Africa: A systematic review and Meta-analysis Increase of serum vitamin D levels in the COVID-19 pandemic: Report of a Mexican reference clinical laboratory Hypoalbuminemia on admission in diabetic patients correlates with severity of illness in COVID-19: A retrospective clinical study and literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1