Data governance and the secondary use of data: The board influence

IF 5.7 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Information and Organization Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2023.100447
Stuart Black , Michael Davern , Sean B. Maynard , Humza Nasser
{"title":"Data governance and the secondary use of data: The board influence","authors":"Stuart Black ,&nbsp;Michael Davern ,&nbsp;Sean B. Maynard ,&nbsp;Humza Nasser","doi":"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2023.100447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The business analytics and </span>strategic management<span> literatures suggest that organizations should seek to exploit data as a key mechanism for competitive advantage. However, the rules of engagement are evolving, the regulatory landscape is becoming increasingly complex, and examples of poor outcomes are increasingly common. The board – in its role of setting and monitoring risk appetite – needs to be able to govern the risk/reward trade-off of the data asset. Contemporary data governance approaches are inadequate: they are overly rigid and risk oriented, limited in scope to an organization's self-interest rather than considering the broad set of stakeholders, and do not provide a platform for the board to manage this critical risk. This paper uses a unique set of informants – 41 board directors – to demonstrate that differences in board perspectives influence how organizations explore the secondary use of data. Furthermore, this paper identifies a set of relevant individual, organizational and environmental factors and presents empirically based configurations of these factors that lead organizations to consider (or neglect) the secondary use of data as a critical enabler of competitive advantage.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":47253,"journal":{"name":"Information and Organization","volume":"33 2","pages":"Article 100447"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Organization","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471772723000015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The business analytics and strategic management literatures suggest that organizations should seek to exploit data as a key mechanism for competitive advantage. However, the rules of engagement are evolving, the regulatory landscape is becoming increasingly complex, and examples of poor outcomes are increasingly common. The board – in its role of setting and monitoring risk appetite – needs to be able to govern the risk/reward trade-off of the data asset. Contemporary data governance approaches are inadequate: they are overly rigid and risk oriented, limited in scope to an organization's self-interest rather than considering the broad set of stakeholders, and do not provide a platform for the board to manage this critical risk. This paper uses a unique set of informants – 41 board directors – to demonstrate that differences in board perspectives influence how organizations explore the secondary use of data. Furthermore, this paper identifies a set of relevant individual, organizational and environmental factors and presents empirically based configurations of these factors that lead organizations to consider (or neglect) the secondary use of data as a critical enabler of competitive advantage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数据治理和数据的二次使用:董事会的影响
商业分析和战略管理文献表明,组织应该寻求利用数据作为竞争优势的关键机制。然而,参与规则正在演变,监管环境越来越复杂,不良结果的例子越来越常见。董事会在设定和监控风险偏好方面需要能够管理数据资产的风险/回报权衡。当代的数据治理方法是不够的:它们过于僵化和以风险为导向,范围局限于组织的自身利益,而不是考虑广泛的利益相关者,并且没有为董事会管理这一关键风险提供平台。本文使用了一组独特的线人——41名董事会董事——来证明董事会观点的差异会影响组织探索数据二次使用的方式。此外,本文确定了一组相关的个人、组织和环境因素,并提出了这些因素的基于经验的配置,这些因素导致组织考虑(或忽视)将数据的二次使用作为竞争优势的关键促成因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Advances in information and communication technologies are associated with a wide and increasing range of social consequences, which are experienced by individuals, work groups, organizations, interorganizational networks, and societies at large. Information technologies are implicated in all industries and in public as well as private enterprises. Understanding the relationships between information technologies and social organization is an increasingly important and urgent social and scholarly concern in many disciplinary fields.Information and Organization seeks to publish original scholarly articles on the relationships between information technologies and social organization. It seeks a scholarly understanding that is based on empirical research and relevant theory.
期刊最新文献
Stability and change in digital transformation: A repertoire model of institutionally embedded technology affordances Virtual social contagion in online support communities Transformed knowledge work infrastructures in times of forced remote work Editorial Board Digital innovation, platforms, and global strategy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1