Systemic antibiotics adjuvants to scaling and root planing in type 2 diabetic and periodontitis individuals: Systematic review with network meta-analysis
Shih-Yun Wu , Ching-Yi Wu , Liang-Yu Lin , Yu-hsuan Chen , Hsin-Yi Huang , Yu-Lin Lai , Shyh-Yuan Lee
{"title":"Systemic antibiotics adjuvants to scaling and root planing in type 2 diabetic and periodontitis individuals: Systematic review with network meta-analysis","authors":"Shih-Yun Wu , Ching-Yi Wu , Liang-Yu Lin , Yu-hsuan Chen , Hsin-Yi Huang , Yu-Lin Lai , Shyh-Yuan Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.jdsr.2023.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Targeting inflammatory pathways is considered a common strategy to control type 2 diabetes (T2D) and periodontitis. This overview was to validate systemic antibiotics as an adjuvant to scaling and root planing (SRP) for the treatments of periodontal patients with T2D. Literature searches were conducted using Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE. Randomized trials comparing SRP and systemic antibiotics on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and probing pocket depth (PPD) in adults with T2D and periodontitis were analyzed using network meta-analysis and meta-regression. At 3-month postintervention, meta-analyses of 16 studies revealed that SRP and SRP plus systemic antibiotics (SRPa) had similar significant effects in reducing HbA1c levels of − 0.72% and − 0.96% respectively. While SRP and SRPa also, respectively, reduced PPD of − 0.67 and − 0.89 mm, SRPa showed a better reduction than SRP. At 6-month postintervention, meta-analyses of 7 trials revealed that only SRP was effective in reducing HbA1c levels (−0.29%) but not SRPa. Although both SRP and SRPa still significantly reduced PPD by − 0.56 and − 0.81 mm, respectively, there was no difference between them. The current overview suggested that routine SRP alone is highly recommended for patients with T2D and periodontitis, since systemic antibiotics as an adjuvant provide a rather short-term effect.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51334,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Dental Science Review","volume":"59 ","pages":"Pages 167-178"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Dental Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1882761623000121","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Targeting inflammatory pathways is considered a common strategy to control type 2 diabetes (T2D) and periodontitis. This overview was to validate systemic antibiotics as an adjuvant to scaling and root planing (SRP) for the treatments of periodontal patients with T2D. Literature searches were conducted using Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE. Randomized trials comparing SRP and systemic antibiotics on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and probing pocket depth (PPD) in adults with T2D and periodontitis were analyzed using network meta-analysis and meta-regression. At 3-month postintervention, meta-analyses of 16 studies revealed that SRP and SRP plus systemic antibiotics (SRPa) had similar significant effects in reducing HbA1c levels of − 0.72% and − 0.96% respectively. While SRP and SRPa also, respectively, reduced PPD of − 0.67 and − 0.89 mm, SRPa showed a better reduction than SRP. At 6-month postintervention, meta-analyses of 7 trials revealed that only SRP was effective in reducing HbA1c levels (−0.29%) but not SRPa. Although both SRP and SRPa still significantly reduced PPD by − 0.56 and − 0.81 mm, respectively, there was no difference between them. The current overview suggested that routine SRP alone is highly recommended for patients with T2D and periodontitis, since systemic antibiotics as an adjuvant provide a rather short-term effect.
针对炎症途径被认为是控制2型糖尿病(T2D)和牙周炎的常见策略。本综述旨在验证系统性抗生素作为刮治和根管刨削(SRP)的佐剂,用于治疗T2D牙周病患者。使用Web of Science、PubMed、Cochrane和EMBASE进行文献检索。使用网络荟萃分析和元回归分析比较SRP和全身抗生素对成人T2D和牙周炎患者糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和探测袋深度(PPD)的随机试验。干预后3个月,对16项研究的荟萃分析显示,SRP和SRP加全身抗生素(SRPa)在降低HbA1c水平方面具有相似的显著效果,分别为−0.72%和−0.96%。虽然SRP和SRPa也分别降低了−0.67和−0.89 mm的PPD,但SRPa的降低效果要好于SRP。干预后6个月,对7项试验的荟萃分析显示,只有SRP能有效降低HbA1c水平(-0.29%),但SRPa无效。尽管SRP和SRPa仍然分别显著降低了−0.56和−0.81 mm的PPD,但两者之间没有差异。目前的综述表明,强烈建议T2D和牙周炎患者单独使用常规SRP,因为系统性抗生素作为佐剂提供了相当短期的效果。
期刊介绍:
The Japanese Dental Science Review is published by the Japanese Association for Dental Science aiming to introduce the modern aspects of the dental basic and clinical sciences in Japan, and to share and discuss the update information with foreign researchers and dentists for further development of dentistry. In principle, papers are written and submitted on the invitation of one of the Editors, although the Editors would be glad to receive suggestions. Proposals for review articles should be sent by the authors to one of the Editors by e-mail. All submitted papers are subject to the peer- refereeing process.