{"title":"Javelin use among Ethiopia’s last indigenous hunters: Variability and further constraints on tip cross-sectional geometry","authors":"Yonatan Sahle , Seid Ahmed , Samuel J. Dira","doi":"10.1016/j.jaa.2023.101505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ethnographically known weapon systems are crucial for the functional interpretation of pertinent archaeological materials. The tip cross-sectional geometries of North American ethnographic projectiles are particularly widely used as standards against which the probable functions of archaeological stone points are assessed. While their known weapon-delivery mechanisms make these North American samples ideal references for archaeological investigations, their applicability to Afro-Eurasian assemblages is contestable. Using metric and contextual data from contemporary hunting javelins in southwestern Ethiopia, we expand on recent efforts to recalibrate such reference datasets. We find that overall javelin size and tip geometry are governed by factors ranging from the hunter’s age and physical competence to prey type and the intended hunting (e.g., startling, diverting, wounding, killing), and even symbolic/ceremonial, tasks. We argue that such dynamics may explain the great variation in the tip cross-sectional geometries of stone points in the archaeological record. Comparisons of our tip cross-sectional values with relevant published data provide further metric constraints and highlight the need for cautious interpretations of prehistoric weapon-delivery mechanisms where the role of symbolism and of children in the making of the archaeological record should also be considered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47957,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anthropological Archaeology","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 101505"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anthropological Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278416523000211","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Ethnographically known weapon systems are crucial for the functional interpretation of pertinent archaeological materials. The tip cross-sectional geometries of North American ethnographic projectiles are particularly widely used as standards against which the probable functions of archaeological stone points are assessed. While their known weapon-delivery mechanisms make these North American samples ideal references for archaeological investigations, their applicability to Afro-Eurasian assemblages is contestable. Using metric and contextual data from contemporary hunting javelins in southwestern Ethiopia, we expand on recent efforts to recalibrate such reference datasets. We find that overall javelin size and tip geometry are governed by factors ranging from the hunter’s age and physical competence to prey type and the intended hunting (e.g., startling, diverting, wounding, killing), and even symbolic/ceremonial, tasks. We argue that such dynamics may explain the great variation in the tip cross-sectional geometries of stone points in the archaeological record. Comparisons of our tip cross-sectional values with relevant published data provide further metric constraints and highlight the need for cautious interpretations of prehistoric weapon-delivery mechanisms where the role of symbolism and of children in the making of the archaeological record should also be considered.
期刊介绍:
An innovative, international publication, the Journal of Anthropological Archaeology is devoted to the development of theory and, in a broad sense, methodology for the systematic and rigorous understanding of the organization, operation, and evolution of human societies. The discipline served by the journal is characterized by its goals and approach, not by geographical or temporal bounds. The data utilized or treated range from the earliest archaeological evidence for the emergence of human culture to historically documented societies and the contemporary observations of the ethnographer, ethnoarchaeologist, sociologist, or geographer. These subjects appear in the journal as examples of cultural organization, operation, and evolution, not as specific historical phenomena.