Realizing new potential in vocabulary studies: Co-registration of eye movements and brain potentials

Manuel F. Pulido , Kathy Conklin
{"title":"Realizing new potential in vocabulary studies: Co-registration of eye movements and brain potentials","authors":"Manuel F. Pulido ,&nbsp;Kathy Conklin","doi":"10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Progress in vocabulary learning is often not immediately apparent in behavior, posing limitations to our understanding of ongoing development. One potentially fruitful approach lies in the use of EEG to examine brain potentials, which may reveal changes in vocabulary acquisition that precede behavioral outcomes. Until recently, however, the word-by-word presentation of EEG paradigms was not compatible with natural reading experiments. The simultaneous recording (or “co-registration”) of eye movements and EEG can advance our current understanding of how vocabulary processing and learning unfolds in real time during reading, e.g., indicating when a sensitivity to the form and meaning components of vocabulary emerges. Despite advances of co-registration in allied fields, its potential in vocabulary studies is still unrealized. This may be due to uncertainty on how to design studies that appropriately match the method with research questions. We provide some methodological guidance and provide suggestions to help kick-start co-registration in vocabulary research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101075,"journal":{"name":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","volume":"2 3","pages":"Article 100077"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277276612300037X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Progress in vocabulary learning is often not immediately apparent in behavior, posing limitations to our understanding of ongoing development. One potentially fruitful approach lies in the use of EEG to examine brain potentials, which may reveal changes in vocabulary acquisition that precede behavioral outcomes. Until recently, however, the word-by-word presentation of EEG paradigms was not compatible with natural reading experiments. The simultaneous recording (or “co-registration”) of eye movements and EEG can advance our current understanding of how vocabulary processing and learning unfolds in real time during reading, e.g., indicating when a sensitivity to the form and meaning components of vocabulary emerges. Despite advances of co-registration in allied fields, its potential in vocabulary studies is still unrealized. This may be due to uncertainty on how to design studies that appropriately match the method with research questions. We provide some methodological guidance and provide suggestions to help kick-start co-registration in vocabulary research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实现词汇学习的新潜力:眼动和脑电位的共同注册
词汇学习的进步往往不会在行为中立即显现出来,这对我们对正在进行的发展的理解造成了限制。一种潜在的富有成效的方法是使用脑电图来检查大脑电位,这可能揭示在行为结果之前词汇习得的变化。然而,直到最近,脑电图范式的逐字呈现还与自然阅读实验不兼容。眼动和脑电图的同时记录(或“共同配准”)可以促进我们目前对词汇处理和学习在阅读过程中如何实时展开的理解,例如,指示何时对词汇的形式和意义成分产生敏感性。尽管联合注册在相关领域取得了进展,但其在词汇研究中的潜力仍未实现。这可能是由于如何设计与研究问题相匹配的方法的不确定性。我们提供了一些方法论指导和建议,以帮助启动词汇研究中的共同注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Toward ethical praxis in longitudinal research with children: Reflecting on ethical tensions in participatory research A conversation analysis-complex dynamics systems theory (CA-CDST) approach for analyzing longitudinal development in L2 pragmatics Categorising speakers’ language background: Theoretical assumptions and methodological challenges for learner corpus research Data from role plays and elicited conversations: What do they show about L2 interactional competence?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1