The impact of cognitive and motivational resources on engagement with automated formative feedback

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102234
Veronika Barkela , Lukas Schmitt , Miriam Leuchter
{"title":"The impact of cognitive and motivational resources on engagement with automated formative feedback","authors":"Veronika Barkela ,&nbsp;Lukas Schmitt ,&nbsp;Miriam Leuchter","doi":"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The effectiveness of automated formative feedback highly depends on student feedback engagement that is largely determined by learners’ cognitive and motivational resources. Yet, most studies have only investigated either cognitive resources (e.g., mental effort), or motivational resources (e.g., expectancy-value-cost variables). The purpose of this study is to examine the development (indicated by time) and relationship of 1) cognitive, 2) affective, and 3) behavioral feedback engagement as a function of cognitive and motivational resources in a computer-based learning environment with automated formative feedback. Data was collected from <em>N</em> = 330 German B.Ed. Elementary Education students who worked four consecutive sessions on summarizing texts. Previously invested mental effort (t − 1) affected situational expectancy and cost but not situational value. 1) Cognitive feedback engagement was positively associated with previous performance but neither associated with cognitive nor motivational resources. 2) Affective feedback engagement was positively associated with intrinsic value and negatively associated with situational expectancies, invested mental effort and previous performance. 3) Behavioral feedback engagement was positively associated with situational expectancies and invested mental effort. This study contributes to the understanding of student’s cognitive and motivational structures when engaging with automated formative feedback.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X23000887","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effectiveness of automated formative feedback highly depends on student feedback engagement that is largely determined by learners’ cognitive and motivational resources. Yet, most studies have only investigated either cognitive resources (e.g., mental effort), or motivational resources (e.g., expectancy-value-cost variables). The purpose of this study is to examine the development (indicated by time) and relationship of 1) cognitive, 2) affective, and 3) behavioral feedback engagement as a function of cognitive and motivational resources in a computer-based learning environment with automated formative feedback. Data was collected from N = 330 German B.Ed. Elementary Education students who worked four consecutive sessions on summarizing texts. Previously invested mental effort (t − 1) affected situational expectancy and cost but not situational value. 1) Cognitive feedback engagement was positively associated with previous performance but neither associated with cognitive nor motivational resources. 2) Affective feedback engagement was positively associated with intrinsic value and negatively associated with situational expectancies, invested mental effort and previous performance. 3) Behavioral feedback engagement was positively associated with situational expectancies and invested mental effort. This study contributes to the understanding of student’s cognitive and motivational structures when engaging with automated formative feedback.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知和动机资源对参与自动化形成性反馈的影响
自动形成性反馈的有效性在很大程度上取决于学生的反馈参与度,而反馈参与度很大程度上由学习者的认知和动机资源决定。然而,大多数研究只调查了认知资源(如心理努力)或动机资源(如期望值成本变量)。本研究的目的是考察在具有自动形成性反馈的基于计算机的学习环境中,1)认知、2)情感和3)行为反馈参与作为认知和动机资源的函数的发展(以时间表示)和关系。数据收集自330名德国基础教育学士学生,他们连续四次进行文本总结。先前投入的心理努力(t-1)影响情景预期和成本,但不影响情景价值。1) 认知反馈参与与先前的表现呈正相关,但与认知或动机资源无关。2) 情感反馈参与与内在价值呈正相关,与情境预期、投入的心理努力和先前的表现呈负相关。3) 行为反馈参与与情境预期和投入的心理努力呈正相关。这项研究有助于理解学生在进行自动形成性反馈时的认知和动机结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1