A composite X-minute city cycling accessibility metric and its role in assessing spatial and socioeconomic inequalities – A case study in Utrecht, the Netherlands

IF 2.7 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Journal of Urban Mobility Pub Date : 2022-12-28 DOI:10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100043
Elizabeth Knap , Mehmet Baran Ulak , Karst T. Geurs , Alex Mulders , Sander van der Drift
{"title":"A composite X-minute city cycling accessibility metric and its role in assessing spatial and socioeconomic inequalities – A case study in Utrecht, the Netherlands","authors":"Elizabeth Knap ,&nbsp;Mehmet Baran Ulak ,&nbsp;Karst T. Geurs ,&nbsp;Alex Mulders ,&nbsp;Sander van der Drift","doi":"10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The 15 min city (or “X-minute city” in general) concept aims to give people access to all essential services and daily needs (e.g., healthcare, education, etc.) within X minutes of active transportation, to improve transport equity, sustainability, and traffic safety. To date, there is a lack of methods and tools to assess to what degree cities currently, or after implementing policies, comply with the X-minute city concept. This research aims to develop a methodology for quantifying the X-minute city through a metric (CS<sub>x</sub>) that was developed based on an accessibility framework and tested for cycling mode in the Utrecht region in the Netherlands as a study area. Travel data from the Netherlands mobility panel were analysed to determine input characteristics of the metric, such as the weight of destination types. Standardized gravity-based 2-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) accessibility scores for all destination types were weighted and aggregated into a composite metric that shows relative scores as an X-minute city. The results of the analysis show that 100% of the population in the Utrecht region has access to at least one destination for all 9 destination types within 15 min, whereas this number reduces to 94% within a 10 min cycling threshold; indicating the status of Utrecht as a cycling city with cycling-friendly infrastructure. Furthermore, low-income groups do not have lower cycling accessibility to the services in the 15 min city in the study area, reinforcing the notion that cycling can be an effective solution to reduce transport inequalities. The developed metric can be used to assess cities on their way towards becoming X-minute city, prioritise neighbourhoods to develop, set quantifiable goals, and evaluate planning scenarios.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100852,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Mobility","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100043"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091722000310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The 15 min city (or “X-minute city” in general) concept aims to give people access to all essential services and daily needs (e.g., healthcare, education, etc.) within X minutes of active transportation, to improve transport equity, sustainability, and traffic safety. To date, there is a lack of methods and tools to assess to what degree cities currently, or after implementing policies, comply with the X-minute city concept. This research aims to develop a methodology for quantifying the X-minute city through a metric (CSx) that was developed based on an accessibility framework and tested for cycling mode in the Utrecht region in the Netherlands as a study area. Travel data from the Netherlands mobility panel were analysed to determine input characteristics of the metric, such as the weight of destination types. Standardized gravity-based 2-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) accessibility scores for all destination types were weighted and aggregated into a composite metric that shows relative scores as an X-minute city. The results of the analysis show that 100% of the population in the Utrecht region has access to at least one destination for all 9 destination types within 15 min, whereas this number reduces to 94% within a 10 min cycling threshold; indicating the status of Utrecht as a cycling city with cycling-friendly infrastructure. Furthermore, low-income groups do not have lower cycling accessibility to the services in the 15 min city in the study area, reinforcing the notion that cycling can be an effective solution to reduce transport inequalities. The developed metric can be used to assess cities on their way towards becoming X-minute city, prioritise neighbourhoods to develop, set quantifiable goals, and evaluate planning scenarios.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个复合的x分钟城市骑行可达性指标及其在评估空间和社会经济不平等中的作用——以荷兰乌得勒支为例
15分钟城市(或一般的“X分钟城市”)概念旨在让人们在活跃交通的X分钟内获得所有基本服务和日常需求(如医疗保健、教育等),以提高交通公平性、可持续性和交通安全。到目前为止,还缺乏评估城市目前或在实施政策后在多大程度上符合X分钟城市概念的方法和工具。本研究旨在开发一种方法,通过一个基于无障碍框架开发的指标(CSx)来量化X分钟城市,并在荷兰乌得勒支地区作为研究区域对自行车模式进行了测试。分析了荷兰流动性小组的旅行数据,以确定指标的输入特征,如目的地类型的权重。对所有目的地类型的基于重力的标准化两步浮动集水区(2SFCA)可达性得分进行加权,并将其汇总为一个综合指标,显示X分钟城市的相对得分。分析结果表明,乌得勒支地区100%的人口在15分钟内可以到达所有9种目的地类型的至少一个目的地,而在10分钟的骑行阈值内,这一数字降至94%;这表明乌得勒支是一个拥有自行车友好基础设施的自行车城市。此外,在研究区域的15分钟城市,低收入群体骑自行车获得服务的机会并不低,这强化了骑自行车可以成为减少交通不平等的有效解决方案的观念。所开发的指标可用于评估正在成为X分钟城市的城市,优先考虑要开发的街区,设定可量化的目标,并评估规划场景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contrasting Stakeholders’ Perspectives on the First Full-Year School Street Initiatives in Ontario, Canada Just around the corner: Accessibility by proximity in the 15-minute city Diminishing returns of additional active travel infrastructure: Evaluating Barcelona's decade of sustainable transportation progress Effects of different mobility concepts in new residential areas Enhancing last mile connectivity using shared mobility: A stated preference survey of business park commuters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1