Assessing the feasibility of estimating the age and sex from virtual 3D models: A pilot study into virtual forensic anthropology.

IF 0.8 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Forensic Imaging Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.fri.2023.200544
Hanna Jepps , Rachael Carew , Sherry Nakhaeizadeh
{"title":"Assessing the feasibility of estimating the age and sex from virtual 3D models: A pilot study into virtual forensic anthropology.","authors":"Hanna Jepps ,&nbsp;Rachael Carew ,&nbsp;Sherry Nakhaeizadeh","doi":"10.1016/j.fri.2023.200544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Virtual anthropology is an ever-growing sub-field within forensic anthropology that is being applied across a variety of forensic anthropological research areas (Franklin et al, 2016). However, no previous studies have investigated the impact of participant confidence levels in analysing 3D virtual skeletal models. This study explores the feasibility of estimating sex and age from 3D virtual skull and os coxa models, aiming to investigate the feasibility of moving the field of forensic anthropology into virtual lab spaces. A total of 71 participants completed an online survey requiring analysis of published virtual 3D skeletal models. Participants were asked to rate their confidence in the methodology and overall sex/age estimation, as well as preference for assessment method for each skeletal model. Statistical Analysis revealed that level of experience in analysing dry bones was found to not be associated with higher confidence in analysing 3D virtual remains (p=0.360 for sex of skull; p=0.494 for sex of os coxa; p=0.845 for age of os coxa). Confidence ratings for students in analysing skeletal remains in person did not predict perceived difficulty of analysing 3D virtual skeletal models (p=0.717 for sex of skull; p=0.579 for sex of os coxa; p=0.733 for age of os coxa). Prior 3D virtual experience did make a difference in confidence levels in the estimation of skull-sex and os coxa-age models (p=003 and p=0.001). Yet, prior 3D experience did not impact confidence levels with os coxa-sex (p=0.093). To provide insight into the results, the social cognitive concept of the ‘self-efficacy’ theory is discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":40763,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Imaging","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 200544"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666225623000131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Virtual anthropology is an ever-growing sub-field within forensic anthropology that is being applied across a variety of forensic anthropological research areas (Franklin et al, 2016). However, no previous studies have investigated the impact of participant confidence levels in analysing 3D virtual skeletal models. This study explores the feasibility of estimating sex and age from 3D virtual skull and os coxa models, aiming to investigate the feasibility of moving the field of forensic anthropology into virtual lab spaces. A total of 71 participants completed an online survey requiring analysis of published virtual 3D skeletal models. Participants were asked to rate their confidence in the methodology and overall sex/age estimation, as well as preference for assessment method for each skeletal model. Statistical Analysis revealed that level of experience in analysing dry bones was found to not be associated with higher confidence in analysing 3D virtual remains (p=0.360 for sex of skull; p=0.494 for sex of os coxa; p=0.845 for age of os coxa). Confidence ratings for students in analysing skeletal remains in person did not predict perceived difficulty of analysing 3D virtual skeletal models (p=0.717 for sex of skull; p=0.579 for sex of os coxa; p=0.733 for age of os coxa). Prior 3D virtual experience did make a difference in confidence levels in the estimation of skull-sex and os coxa-age models (p=003 and p=0.001). Yet, prior 3D experience did not impact confidence levels with os coxa-sex (p=0.093). To provide insight into the results, the social cognitive concept of the ‘self-efficacy’ theory is discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估从虚拟3D模型估计年龄和性别的可行性:虚拟法医人类学的初步研究。
虚拟人类学是法医人类学中一个不断发展的子领域,正被应用于各种法医人类学研究领域(Franklin等人,2016)。然而,之前没有研究调查参与者信心水平对分析3D虚拟骨骼模型的影响。本研究探索了从3D虚拟头骨和髋关节模型估计性别和年龄的可行性,旨在研究将法医人类学领域转移到虚拟实验室空间的可行性。共有71名参与者完成了一项在线调查,要求对已发布的虚拟3D骨骼模型进行分析。参与者被要求对方法和总体性别/年龄估计的信心进行评分,以及对每个骨骼模型的评估方法的偏好。统计分析显示,分析干骨的经验水平与分析3D虚拟遗骸的较高置信度无关(颅骨性别p=0.360;髋关节性别p=0.494;髋关节年龄p=0.845)。学生在亲自分析骨骼遗骸时的置信度并不能预测分析3D虚拟骨骼模型的感知难度(颅骨性别p=0.717;髋关节性别p=0.579;髋关节年龄p=0.733)。在颅骨性别和髋关节年龄模型的估计中,先前的3D虚拟体验确实对置信水平产生了影响(p=0.003和p=0.001)。然而,先前的三维体验对髋关节性别的置信水平没有影响(p=0.093)。为了深入了解结果,讨论了“自我效能”理论的社会认知概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic Imaging
Forensic Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
27.30%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Closed iris, long exposure photography improves three-dimensional photogrammetric bone reconstructions Cranial surgical approaches in the 21st Century Identified Skeletal Collection Unveiling the diagnostic accuracy of PMCT: Detection of pneumonia considering postmortem changes and time intervals Exploring lightweight convolution neural networks for segmenting striation marks from firearm bullet images Age estimation based on sternebral fusion in a sample of Egyptian population using three-dimensional computed tomography scanning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1