Incorporating IMERG satellite precipitation uncertainty into seasonal and peak streamflow predictions using the Hillslope Link hydrological model

IF 3.1 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Hydrology X Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hydroa.2023.100148
Samantha H. Hartke , Daniel B. Wright , Felipe Quintero , Aline S. Falck
{"title":"Incorporating IMERG satellite precipitation uncertainty into seasonal and peak streamflow predictions using the Hillslope Link hydrological model","authors":"Samantha H. Hartke ,&nbsp;Daniel B. Wright ,&nbsp;Felipe Quintero ,&nbsp;Aline S. Falck","doi":"10.1016/j.hydroa.2023.100148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In global applications and data sparse regions, which comprise most of the earth, hydrologic model-based flood monitoring relies on precipitation data from satellite multisensor precipitation products or numerical weather forecasts. However, these products often exhibit substantial errors during the meteorological conditions that lead to flooding, including extreme rainfall. The propagation of precipitation forcing errors to predicted runoff and streamflow is scale-dependent and requires an understanding of the autocorrelation structure of precipitation errors, since error autocorrelation impacts the accumulation of precipitation errors over space and time in hydrologic models. Previous efforts to account for satellite precipitation uncertainty in hydrologic models have demonstrated the potential for improving streamflow estimates; however, these efforts use satellite precipitation error models that rely heavily on ground reference data such as rain gages or weather radar and do not characterize the nonstationarity of precipitation error autocorrelation structures. This work evaluates a new method, the Space-Time Rainfall Error and Autocorrelation Model (STREAM), which stochastically generates possible true precipitation fields, as input to the Hillslope Link Model to generate ensemble streamflow estimates. Unlike previous error models, STREAM represents the nonstationary and anisotropic autocorrelation structure of satellite precipitation error and does not use any ground reference to do so. Ensemble streamflow predictions are compared with streamflow generated using satellite precipitation fields as well as a radar-gage precipitation dataset during peak flow events. Results demonstrate that this approach to accounting for precipitation uncertainty effectively characterizes the uncertainty in streamflow estimates and reduces the error of predicted streamflow. Streamflow ensembles forced by STREAM improve streamflow prediction nearly to the level obtained using ground-reference forcing data across basin sizes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology X","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100148"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589915523000019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In global applications and data sparse regions, which comprise most of the earth, hydrologic model-based flood monitoring relies on precipitation data from satellite multisensor precipitation products or numerical weather forecasts. However, these products often exhibit substantial errors during the meteorological conditions that lead to flooding, including extreme rainfall. The propagation of precipitation forcing errors to predicted runoff and streamflow is scale-dependent and requires an understanding of the autocorrelation structure of precipitation errors, since error autocorrelation impacts the accumulation of precipitation errors over space and time in hydrologic models. Previous efforts to account for satellite precipitation uncertainty in hydrologic models have demonstrated the potential for improving streamflow estimates; however, these efforts use satellite precipitation error models that rely heavily on ground reference data such as rain gages or weather radar and do not characterize the nonstationarity of precipitation error autocorrelation structures. This work evaluates a new method, the Space-Time Rainfall Error and Autocorrelation Model (STREAM), which stochastically generates possible true precipitation fields, as input to the Hillslope Link Model to generate ensemble streamflow estimates. Unlike previous error models, STREAM represents the nonstationary and anisotropic autocorrelation structure of satellite precipitation error and does not use any ground reference to do so. Ensemble streamflow predictions are compared with streamflow generated using satellite precipitation fields as well as a radar-gage precipitation dataset during peak flow events. Results demonstrate that this approach to accounting for precipitation uncertainty effectively characterizes the uncertainty in streamflow estimates and reduces the error of predicted streamflow. Streamflow ensembles forced by STREAM improve streamflow prediction nearly to the level obtained using ground-reference forcing data across basin sizes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用Hillslope Link水文模型将IMERG卫星降水不确定性纳入季节和高峰流量预测
在包括地球大部分地区的全球应用和数据稀疏区域中,基于水文模型的洪水监测依赖于来自卫星多传感器降水产品或数值天气预报的降水数据。然而,这些产品在导致洪水(包括极端降雨)的气象条件下往往会出现重大错误。降水强迫误差对预测径流和径流的传播是规模相关的,需要了解降水误差的自相关结构,因为误差自相关影响水文模型中降水误差在空间和时间上的累积。以前在水文模型中考虑卫星降水不确定性的努力已经证明了改进流量估计的潜力;然而,这些工作使用的卫星降水误差模型严重依赖于地面参考数据,如雨量计或天气雷达,并且没有表征降水误差自相关结构的非平稳性。这项工作评估了一种新的方法,时空降雨误差和自相关模型(STREAM),该模型随机生成可能的真实降水场,作为Hillslope Link模型的输入,以生成综合流量估计。与以前的误差模型不同,STREAM表示卫星降水误差的非平稳和各向异性自相关结构,并且不使用任何地面参考。集合径流预测与峰值流量事件期间使用卫星降水场和雷达测量降水数据集生成的径流进行比较。结果表明,这种计算降水不确定性的方法有效地表征了流量估计中的不确定性,并降低了预测流量的误差。STREAM强制的径流集合将径流预测提高到几乎使用地面参考强制数据获得的流域大小的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology X
Journal of Hydrology X Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
20
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Association of climate variability modes with concurrent droughts and heatwaves in India Climatology of extreme precipitation spells induced by cloudburst-like events during the Indian Summer Monsoon AutoVL: Automated streamflow separation for changing catchments and climate impact analysis Practical application of time-lapse camera imagery to develop water-level data for three hydrologic monitoring sites in Wisconsin during water year 2020 Hydrograph and recession flows simulations using deep learning: Watershed uniqueness and objective functions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1