Hypnosis for acquired brain injury: Four patient cases and five testable predictions

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2023.101046
Jonas Kristoffer Lindeløv , Timo L. Kvamme , Kristine Rømer Thomsen , Rikke Overgaard , Morten Overgaard
{"title":"Hypnosis for acquired brain injury: Four patient cases and five testable predictions","authors":"Jonas Kristoffer Lindeløv , Timo L. Kvamme , Kristine Rømer Thomsen , Rikke Overgaard , Morten Overgaard","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2023.101046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"71 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Ideas in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X23000399","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
催眠治疗获得性脑损伤:四个病例和五个可测试的预测
最近的研究发现,催眠暗示对后天性脑损伤后的认知障碍有很大的治疗作用。然而,人们对这些影响的潜在机制知之甚少。提出了一个总体框架,其中(1)认知性脑损伤后遗症的很大一部分可归因于消极的自我期望,(2)催眠是操纵消极自我期望的有力方法。四个案例为这一框架提供了例证和补充。首先,大脑恢复的心理图像可能是有效的,即使它与“真实”的身体脑损伤不符。其次,一些患者尽管有很大的客观改善,但主观上并没有改善。第三,一些患者在受到激励的情况下抑制了积极的治疗效果,例如,当他们在正在进行的诉讼中被评估为金钱补偿时。第四,受伤前的自传体记忆可能是取得积极治疗效果的重要前提。我们得出了五个可测试的预测,这些预测可以进一步优化获得性脑损伤的催眠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: New Ideas in Psychology is a journal for theoretical psychology in its broadest sense. We are looking for new and seminal ideas, from within Psychology and from other fields that have something to bring to Psychology. We welcome presentations and criticisms of theory, of background metaphysics, and of fundamental issues of method, both empirical and conceptual. We put special emphasis on the need for informed discussion of psychological theories to be interdisciplinary. Empirical papers are accepted at New Ideas in Psychology, but only as long as they focus on conceptual issues and are theoretically creative. We are also open to comments or debate, interviews, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Speaking from the in-between: Neurotypical perspectivelessness, neurodivergent authority, and the politics of knowledge From with-ness to readiness: Writing-With and the Spiral Ethics Protocol-Fourfold (SEP-4) for generative-AI writing Is emesis a part of antenatal depression? A proposal of emesis-depression complex during pregnancy Up in a flash: On the narratological and epistemic aspects of flashbulb memories Breaking the chains of independence: A Bayesian uncertainty model of normative violations in human causal probabilistic reasoning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1