The American psychological Association's practice guidelines for men and boys: Are they hurting rather than helping male mental wellness?

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2022.100984
Christopher J. Ferguson
{"title":"The American psychological Association's practice guidelines for men and boys: Are they hurting rather than helping male mental wellness?","authors":"Christopher J. Ferguson","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2022.100984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"68 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Ideas in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X2200054X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国心理学会针对男性和男孩的实践指南:它们对男性心理健康是有害的,而不是有益的?
美国心理协会(APA)的《男性和男孩实践指南》于2018年推出,旨在为从业者在看男性患者时提供有用的指导。这遵循了其他实践的传统和针对特定身份人群的临床工作的临床指南。然而,针对男性和男孩的实践指南很快就引起了争议,因为人们担心该指南贬低了男性和男孩,尤其是那些具有传统价值观的男性和男孩。该指南试图强加进步或女权主义的性别规范和意识形态,而不是继续关注临床健康和同理心。这项审查发现,尽管这些指导方针是本着诚意提出的,但许多批评可能是有效的。具体而言,该指南没有承认生物学对性别影响的重要证据(例如,荷尔蒙和下丘脑对性别认同和性别行为的影响),无意中贬低了传统男性和家庭,与特定的社会文化叙事过于紧密,缺乏不支持这些叙事的数据。结论是,人们有理由担心,目前的指导方针可能会劝阻传统男性和家庭寻求咨询,弊大于利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: New Ideas in Psychology is a journal for theoretical psychology in its broadest sense. We are looking for new and seminal ideas, from within Psychology and from other fields that have something to bring to Psychology. We welcome presentations and criticisms of theory, of background metaphysics, and of fundamental issues of method, both empirical and conceptual. We put special emphasis on the need for informed discussion of psychological theories to be interdisciplinary. Empirical papers are accepted at New Ideas in Psychology, but only as long as they focus on conceptual issues and are theoretically creative. We are also open to comments or debate, interviews, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Psychiatrization in Czech lexical data: Everyday adjectives are acquiring clinical connotations Editorial Board What happens to representatives during family constellations? Attempts at explanation and comparison with other difficult-to-explain phenomena Re-enchanting mirror neurons through lexical changes Actions Speak Louder than outcomes leading to ineffective altruism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1