{"title":"A Comparative Study of Traditional Donors and Non-traditional Donors in Sri Lanka","authors":"Narayani Sritharan","doi":"10.1016/j.orbis.2023.08.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article examines subnational aid allocation patterns during the postwar period in Sri Lanka, focusing on whether war-affected areas receive aid. We use geocoding, mapping, and econometric analysis to understand whether war-affected districts received more aid than others after controlling for economic development. The article uses geocoded aid projects comparing the aid allocation priorities of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as a bilateral donor and World Bank and Asian Development Bank as multilateral donors. The PRC and World Bank aid projects’ geocoded data come from AidData, while we geocoded Asian Development Bank projects at the ADM2 level. The data covers 2002–2014, both years included. The study finds that, in general, donors do not respond to the needs of the poorer and war-affected districts, which affects reconciliation and, thereby, long-term sustainable peace. Additionally, we find that China aid project allocations are motivated by domestic politicians, whereas that may be different for multilateral aid projects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45433,"journal":{"name":"Orbis","volume":"67 4","pages":"Pages 579-604"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orbis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030438723000418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article examines subnational aid allocation patterns during the postwar period in Sri Lanka, focusing on whether war-affected areas receive aid. We use geocoding, mapping, and econometric analysis to understand whether war-affected districts received more aid than others after controlling for economic development. The article uses geocoded aid projects comparing the aid allocation priorities of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as a bilateral donor and World Bank and Asian Development Bank as multilateral donors. The PRC and World Bank aid projects’ geocoded data come from AidData, while we geocoded Asian Development Bank projects at the ADM2 level. The data covers 2002–2014, both years included. The study finds that, in general, donors do not respond to the needs of the poorer and war-affected districts, which affects reconciliation and, thereby, long-term sustainable peace. Additionally, we find that China aid project allocations are motivated by domestic politicians, whereas that may be different for multilateral aid projects.
期刊介绍：
Orbis, the Foreign Policy Research Institute quarterly journal of world affairs, was founded in 1957 as a forum for policymakers, scholars, and the informed public who sought an engaging, thought-provoking debate beyond the predictable, conventional journals of that time. Nearly half a century later, Orbis continues to offer informative, insightful, and lively discourse on the full range of topics relating to American foreign policy and national security, as well as in-depth analysis on important international developments. Orbis readers always know the stories behind the headlines.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
