Clarifying confusions over carbon conclusions: antecedent soil carbon drives gains realised following intervention

Albert Muleke , Matthew Tom Harrison , Rowan Eisner , Maria Yanotti , Peter de Voil , Shah Fahad , Wang Fei , Puyu Feng , Carla Ferreira , Daniel Forster , Xionghui Gao , Ke Liu , Jianguo Man , Lixiao Nie , Jiangwen Nie , Zhiming Qi , Narasinha Shurpali , Weilu Wang , Rui Yang , Xiaogang Yin , Jin Zhao
{"title":"Clarifying confusions over carbon conclusions: antecedent soil carbon drives gains realised following intervention","authors":"Albert Muleke ,&nbsp;Matthew Tom Harrison ,&nbsp;Rowan Eisner ,&nbsp;Maria Yanotti ,&nbsp;Peter de Voil ,&nbsp;Shah Fahad ,&nbsp;Wang Fei ,&nbsp;Puyu Feng ,&nbsp;Carla Ferreira ,&nbsp;Daniel Forster ,&nbsp;Xionghui Gao ,&nbsp;Ke Liu ,&nbsp;Jianguo Man ,&nbsp;Lixiao Nie ,&nbsp;Jiangwen Nie ,&nbsp;Zhiming Qi ,&nbsp;Narasinha Shurpali ,&nbsp;Weilu Wang ,&nbsp;Rui Yang ,&nbsp;Xiaogang Yin ,&nbsp;Jin Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.gecadv.2023.100001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Carbon removals associated with incremental gains in soil organic carbon (SOC) at scale have enormous potential to mitigate global warming, yet confusion over contexts that elicit SOC accrual abound. Here, we examine how bespoke interventions (through irrigation, fertiliser, crop type and rotations), antecedent SOC levels and soil type impact on long-term SOC accrual and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Using a whole farm systems modelling approach informed using participatory research, we discovered an inverse relationship between antecedent SOC stocks and SOC gains realised following intervention, with greater initial SOC levels resulting in lower <em>ex poste</em> change in SOC. We found that SOC accrual was greatest for clays and least for sands, although changes in SOC in sandy loam soils were also low. <em>Diversified</em> whole farm adaptations – implemented through inclusion of grain legumes within wheat/canola crop rotations – were more conducive to improvement in SOC stocks, followed by <em>Intensified</em> systems (implemented through greater rates of irrigation, farm areas under irrigation, nitrogen fertiliser and inclusion of rice and maize in crop rotations). Adaptations that <em>Simplified</em> farm systems by reducing irrigation and fertiliser use resulted in the lowest SOC accrual. In most cases, long-term SOC stocks fell when SOC at the outset was greater than 4–5%, regardless of intervention made, soil or crop type, crop rotation, production system or climate. We contend that (1) management interventions primarily impacted SOC in the soil surface (0–30 cm) and had <em>de minimus</em> impact on deep SOC stocks (30–100 cm), (2) crop rotations including wheat, canola and faba beans were more conducive to improvement in SOC stocks, (3) scenarios with high <em>status quo</em> SOC had little impact on crop productivity, and not necessarily the lowest GHG emissions intensity, (4) productivity and GHG emissions intensity were largely a function of the quantum of nitrogenous fertiliser added, rather than SOC stocks, and (5) aspirations for improving SOC are likely to be futile if antecedent SOC stocks are already high (4–5 %). We conclude that potential for improving SOC stocks exists in contexts where antecedent stocks are low (&lt;1%), which may include regions with land degradation, chronic erosion and/or other constraints to vegetative ground cover that could be sustainably and consistently alleviated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100586,"journal":{"name":"Global Environmental Change Advances","volume":"1 ","pages":"Article 100001"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Environmental Change Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950138523000013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Carbon removals associated with incremental gains in soil organic carbon (SOC) at scale have enormous potential to mitigate global warming, yet confusion over contexts that elicit SOC accrual abound. Here, we examine how bespoke interventions (through irrigation, fertiliser, crop type and rotations), antecedent SOC levels and soil type impact on long-term SOC accrual and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Using a whole farm systems modelling approach informed using participatory research, we discovered an inverse relationship between antecedent SOC stocks and SOC gains realised following intervention, with greater initial SOC levels resulting in lower ex poste change in SOC. We found that SOC accrual was greatest for clays and least for sands, although changes in SOC in sandy loam soils were also low. Diversified whole farm adaptations – implemented through inclusion of grain legumes within wheat/canola crop rotations – were more conducive to improvement in SOC stocks, followed by Intensified systems (implemented through greater rates of irrigation, farm areas under irrigation, nitrogen fertiliser and inclusion of rice and maize in crop rotations). Adaptations that Simplified farm systems by reducing irrigation and fertiliser use resulted in the lowest SOC accrual. In most cases, long-term SOC stocks fell when SOC at the outset was greater than 4–5%, regardless of intervention made, soil or crop type, crop rotation, production system or climate. We contend that (1) management interventions primarily impacted SOC in the soil surface (0–30 cm) and had de minimus impact on deep SOC stocks (30–100 cm), (2) crop rotations including wheat, canola and faba beans were more conducive to improvement in SOC stocks, (3) scenarios with high status quo SOC had little impact on crop productivity, and not necessarily the lowest GHG emissions intensity, (4) productivity and GHG emissions intensity were largely a function of the quantum of nitrogenous fertiliser added, rather than SOC stocks, and (5) aspirations for improving SOC are likely to be futile if antecedent SOC stocks are already high (4–5 %). We conclude that potential for improving SOC stocks exists in contexts where antecedent stocks are low (<1%), which may include regions with land degradation, chronic erosion and/or other constraints to vegetative ground cover that could be sustainably and consistently alleviated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澄清对碳结论的困惑:先前的土壤碳驱动干预后实现的收益
与土壤有机碳(SOC)大规模增量增加相关的碳清除量在缓解全球变暖方面具有巨大潜力,但对导致SOC增加的背景仍存在困惑。在这里,我们研究了定制干预措施(通过灌溉、化肥、作物类型和轮作)、先前的SOC水平和土壤类型如何影响长期SOC积累和温室气体(GHG)排放。使用使用参与式研究的整个农场系统建模方法,我们发现先前的SOC存量和干预后实现的SOC收益之间存在反比关系,更高的初始SOC水平导致SOC的事后变化更低。我们发现,粘土的SOC增量最大,砂的SOC增量最小,尽管沙壤土中SOC的变化也很低。多样化的全农场适应——通过将谷物豆类纳入小麦/油菜籽作物轮作来实施——更有利于提高SOC库存,其次是强化系统(通过提高灌溉率、灌溉农田、氮肥以及将水稻和玉米纳入作物轮作来实施)。通过减少灌溉和化肥使用来简化农场系统的适应措施导致了最低的SOC累积。在大多数情况下,无论采取何种干预措施、土壤或作物类型、作物轮作、生产系统或气候,当SOC在一开始大于4-5%时,长期SOC库存都会下降。我们认为:(1)管理干预主要影响土壤表面(0-30 cm)的SOC,对深层SOC储量(30-100 cm)的影响极小;(2)包括小麦、油菜籽和蚕豆在内的作物轮作更有利于提高SOC储量,而不一定是最低的GHG排放强度,(4)生产力和GHG排放强度在很大程度上是氮肥添加量的函数,而不是SOC库存,以及(5)如果先前的SOC库存已经很高(4-5%),那么提高SOC的愿望可能是徒劳的。我们得出的结论是,在前期储量较低(<;1%)的情况下,存在提高SOC储量的潜力,这可能包括土地退化、长期侵蚀和/或植被地面覆盖受到其他限制的地区,这些限制可以得到可持续和持续的缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of cost-effective reduction pathways for major emitting countries to achieve the Paris Agreement climate goal Afforestation on Nordic grasslands: Trade-offs and synergies for climate mitigation, biodiversity, and ecosystem services Renewable energy transition and climate finance nexus in sub-Saharan Africa Another look at ‘peak and decline’ carbon emissions countries: Which ones have decoupled per capita emissions from GDP and how? Projected global sulfur deposition with climate intervention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1