Dynamics of opinion formation, social power evolution, and naïve learning in social networks

IF 7.3 2区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS Annual Reviews in Control Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2023.04.001
Ye Tian , Long Wang
{"title":"Dynamics of opinion formation, social power evolution, and naïve learning in social networks","authors":"Ye Tian ,&nbsp;Long Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.arcontrol.2023.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The past few decades have witnessed a prevalence of applying dynamical models to the study of social networks. This paper reviews recent advances in the investigation of social networks with a predominant focus on agent-based models. Starting from classical models of opinion dynamics, we survey several recently developed models on opinion formation and social power evolution. These models extend the classical models’ cognitive assumption that individuals’ opinions evolve on a single issue by incorporating various sociological or psychological hypotheses to account for the evolution of opinions over multiple or a sequence of interdependent issues. We summarize basic results on the asymptotic behaviors of these models and discuss their sociological interpretations. In addition, we show how these models play a role in the emergence of collective intelligence by applying them to a naïve learning setting. Novel results that reveal how individuals successfully learn an unknown truth over issue sequences are presented. Finally, we conclude the paper and discuss potential directions for future research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50750,"journal":{"name":"Annual Reviews in Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Reviews in Control","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1367578823000196","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The past few decades have witnessed a prevalence of applying dynamical models to the study of social networks. This paper reviews recent advances in the investigation of social networks with a predominant focus on agent-based models. Starting from classical models of opinion dynamics, we survey several recently developed models on opinion formation and social power evolution. These models extend the classical models’ cognitive assumption that individuals’ opinions evolve on a single issue by incorporating various sociological or psychological hypotheses to account for the evolution of opinions over multiple or a sequence of interdependent issues. We summarize basic results on the asymptotic behaviors of these models and discuss their sociological interpretations. In addition, we show how these models play a role in the emergence of collective intelligence by applying them to a naïve learning setting. Novel results that reveal how individuals successfully learn an unknown truth over issue sequences are presented. Finally, we conclude the paper and discuss potential directions for future research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会网络中意见形成、社会权力演化和naïve学习的动态
在过去的几十年里,将动力学模型应用于社交网络研究的现象十分普遍。本文综述了社交网络研究的最新进展,主要关注基于代理的模型。从意见动力学的经典模型开始,我们调查了最近发展起来的关于意见形成和社会权力演变的几个模型。这些模型通过结合各种社会学或心理学假设来解释意见在多个或一系列相互依存的问题上的演变,扩展了经典模型的认知假设,即个人的意见在单个问题上演变。我们总结了这些模型渐近行为的基本结果,并讨论了它们的社会学解释。此外,我们通过将这些模型应用于天真的学习环境,展示了它们如何在集体智慧的出现中发挥作用。给出了揭示个体如何通过问题序列成功学习未知真相的新结果。最后,我们对论文进行了总结,并讨论了未来研究的潜在方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annual Reviews in Control
Annual Reviews in Control 工程技术-自动化与控制系统
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
2.10%
发文量
53
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The field of Control is changing very fast now with technology-driven “societal grand challenges” and with the deployment of new digital technologies. The aim of Annual Reviews in Control is to provide comprehensive and visionary views of the field of Control, by publishing the following types of review articles: Survey Article: Review papers on main methodologies or technical advances adding considerable technical value to the state of the art. Note that papers which purely rely on mechanistic searches and lack comprehensive analysis providing a clear contribution to the field will be rejected. Vision Article: Cutting-edge and emerging topics with visionary perspective on the future of the field or how it will bridge multiple disciplines, and Tutorial research Article: Fundamental guides for future studies.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Analysis and design of model predictive control frameworks for dynamic operation—An overview Advances in controller design of pacemakers for pacing control: A comprehensive review Recent advances in path integral control for trajectory optimization: An overview in theoretical and algorithmic perspectives Analyzing stability in 2D systems via LMIs: From pioneering to recent contributions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1