Inflammatory response in sepsis and hemorrhagic stroke

IF 1.3 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain Hemorrhages Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hest.2022.10.005
Matyas Jelinek , Kamil Duris
{"title":"Inflammatory response in sepsis and hemorrhagic stroke","authors":"Matyas Jelinek ,&nbsp;Kamil Duris","doi":"10.1016/j.hest.2022.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Exaggerated/deregulated inflammatory response is a major medical problem that is often associated with bad outcomes or even the death of the patient. Sepsis and severe hemorrhagic stroke are two illustrative examples because sepsis represents inflammation that is systemic initially, while stroke is initially a local pathology that in severe cases turns into systemic inflammation. There are clear differences between the two pathological conditions in terms of mechanisms and dynamics of inflammatory response at an early stage, while later the inflammatory response becomes uniform. This article aims to describe side-by-side sepsis and hemorrhagic stroke so that similar features and differences can stand out. We will describe the pathophysiological and clinical aspects of sepsis and hemorrhagic stroke, experimental models, the role of inflammation, and molecular mechanisms of inflammation in both conditions. Comparison of inflammatory response in these two model situations may lead to a better understanding of life-threatening conditions pathophysiology, in which the exaggeration/deregulation of the inflammatory response may occur with potentially severe consequences. This article is kept detailed to provide the reader with in-depth information, which should allow him to find the mechanisms of inflammatory response and to elaborate them by himself in the context of his particular needs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33969,"journal":{"name":"Brain Hemorrhages","volume":"4 2","pages":"Pages 96-107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Hemorrhages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589238X22000742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exaggerated/deregulated inflammatory response is a major medical problem that is often associated with bad outcomes or even the death of the patient. Sepsis and severe hemorrhagic stroke are two illustrative examples because sepsis represents inflammation that is systemic initially, while stroke is initially a local pathology that in severe cases turns into systemic inflammation. There are clear differences between the two pathological conditions in terms of mechanisms and dynamics of inflammatory response at an early stage, while later the inflammatory response becomes uniform. This article aims to describe side-by-side sepsis and hemorrhagic stroke so that similar features and differences can stand out. We will describe the pathophysiological and clinical aspects of sepsis and hemorrhagic stroke, experimental models, the role of inflammation, and molecular mechanisms of inflammation in both conditions. Comparison of inflammatory response in these two model situations may lead to a better understanding of life-threatening conditions pathophysiology, in which the exaggeration/deregulation of the inflammatory response may occur with potentially severe consequences. This article is kept detailed to provide the reader with in-depth information, which should allow him to find the mechanisms of inflammatory response and to elaborate them by himself in the context of his particular needs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
败血症和出血性中风的炎症反应
炎症反应过度/失调是一个主要的医学问题,通常与不良后果甚至患者死亡有关。脓毒症和严重出血性中风是两个说明性的例子,因为脓毒症最初代表全身性炎症,而中风最初是一种局部病理,在严重情况下会转变为全身性炎症。这两种病理状态在早期炎症反应的机制和动力学方面存在明显差异,而后来炎症反应变得一致。本文旨在描述并发败血症和出血性中风,以便突出相似的特征和差异。我们将描述败血症和出血性中风的病理生理和临床方面、实验模型、炎症的作用以及这两种情况下炎症的分子机制。比较这两种模型情况下的炎症反应可能有助于更好地了解危及生命的情况的病理生理学,在这种情况下,炎症反应的夸大/放松可能会产生潜在的严重后果。这篇文章保持详细,为读者提供深入的信息,使他能够找到炎症反应的机制,并在自己的特殊需求背景下自行阐述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Hemorrhages
Brain Hemorrhages Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
22 days
期刊最新文献
Recent trends of treatment strategies and outcomes of basal ganglia hemorrhages at a single institution Hemorrhage of the hypothalamic cavernous malformation. Clinical case of surgical treatment Effect of mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes on the inflammatory response after stroke VASP, HCLS1, MSN, and EZR: Key molecular beacons in the pathophysiology of perihematomal edema Post-Intracerebral hemorrhage Brain hemorrhages in traumatic brain injury and the excess burden conferred by anticoagulants and antiplatelets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1