The impact of polyphenolic compounds on the in vitro growth of oak-associated foliar endophytic and saprotrophic fungi

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Fungal Ecology Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.funeco.2023.101226
Megan N. Nickerson, Lillian P. Moore, Jana M. U'Ren
{"title":"The impact of polyphenolic compounds on the in vitro growth of oak-associated foliar endophytic and saprotrophic fungi","authors":"Megan N. Nickerson,&nbsp;Lillian P. Moore,&nbsp;Jana M. U'Ren","doi":"10.1016/j.funeco.2023.101226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Foliar fungal endophytes are horizontally transmitted symbionts that inhabit healthy, photosynthetic tissues of all lineages of land plants where they influence plant health and productivity. Endophyte communities often are more similar among closely related hosts, potentially as a result of a preference for particular morphological, ecophysiological, or chemical host traits. However, the various ecological and evolutionary factors that drive community assembly often are difficult to disentangle. Here, we examined the impact of six polyphenolic compounds on the growth of 15 phylogenetically diverse <em>Quercus</em> (oak)-associated fungal species and assessed whether tolerance to phenolics is associated with their degree of specialization to oaks in nature. Despite frequently reported antifungal properties of phenolics, we found that oak-associated fungi grew the same or better than positive controls in 78% of trials with all compounds, although fungal sensitivity differed as a function of compound type and concentration. Overall, species with high specificity to <em>Quercus</em> had the greatest tolerance to phenolics, whereas generalists were more sensitive. Differences between generalists and specialists suggest that variation in phenolic abundance and composition among oaks may act as a selective filter that influences endophyte host associations in nature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55136,"journal":{"name":"Fungal Ecology","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 101226"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fungal Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175450482300003X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Foliar fungal endophytes are horizontally transmitted symbionts that inhabit healthy, photosynthetic tissues of all lineages of land plants where they influence plant health and productivity. Endophyte communities often are more similar among closely related hosts, potentially as a result of a preference for particular morphological, ecophysiological, or chemical host traits. However, the various ecological and evolutionary factors that drive community assembly often are difficult to disentangle. Here, we examined the impact of six polyphenolic compounds on the growth of 15 phylogenetically diverse Quercus (oak)-associated fungal species and assessed whether tolerance to phenolics is associated with their degree of specialization to oaks in nature. Despite frequently reported antifungal properties of phenolics, we found that oak-associated fungi grew the same or better than positive controls in 78% of trials with all compounds, although fungal sensitivity differed as a function of compound type and concentration. Overall, species with high specificity to Quercus had the greatest tolerance to phenolics, whereas generalists were more sensitive. Differences between generalists and specialists suggest that variation in phenolic abundance and composition among oaks may act as a selective filter that influences endophyte host associations in nature.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多酚类化合物对橡树相关叶片内生真菌和腐生真菌体外生长的影响
叶真菌内生菌是水平传播的共生体,栖息在陆地植物所有谱系的健康、光合组织中,影响植物的健康和生产力。内生植物群落在亲缘关系密切的宿主中往往更相似,这可能是由于对特定形态、生态生理或化学宿主特征的偏好。然而,推动社区集会的各种生态和进化因素往往很难理清。在这里,我们研究了六种多酚化合物对15种系统发育多样的栎属相关真菌生长的影响,并评估了对酚类物质的耐受性是否与它们在自然界中对橡树的特化程度有关。尽管经常报道酚类化合物的抗真菌特性,但我们发现,在78%的所有化合物试验中,橡树相关真菌的生长与阳性对照相同或更好,尽管真菌的敏感性随着化合物类型和浓度的变化而不同。总体而言,对栎属具有高度特异性的物种对酚类物质的耐受性最大,而多面手则更敏感。多面手和专家之间的差异表明,橡树中酚类丰度和组成的变化可能是影响自然界内生菌-宿主关联的选择性过滤器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fungal Ecology
Fungal Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
51
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Fungal Ecology publishes investigations into all aspects of fungal ecology, including the following (not exclusive): population dynamics; adaptation; evolution; role in ecosystem functioning, nutrient cycling, decomposition, carbon allocation; ecophysiology; intra- and inter-specific mycelial interactions, fungus-plant (pathogens, mycorrhizas, lichens, endophytes), fungus-invertebrate and fungus-microbe interaction; genomics and (evolutionary) genetics; conservation and biodiversity; remote sensing; bioremediation and biodegradation; quantitative and computational aspects - modelling, indicators, complexity, informatics. The usual prerequisites for publication will be originality, clarity, and significance as relevant to a better understanding of the ecology of fungi.
期刊最新文献
Bidirectional interactions between Grosmannia abietina and hybrid white spruce: Pathogenicity, monoterpene defense responses, and fungal growth and reproduction Editorial Board Nitrogen and phosphorus additions affect fruiting of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a temperate hardwood forest Transcriptomic and protein analysis of Trametes versicolor interacting with a Hypholoma fasciculare mycelium foraging in soil Disease risk of the foliar endophyte Colletotrichum from invasive Ageratina adenophora to native plants and crops
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1