Why using “consciousness” in psychotherapy? Insight, metacognition and self-consciousness

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2023.101015
Sylvia Martin
{"title":"Why using “consciousness” in psychotherapy? Insight, metacognition and self-consciousness","authors":"Sylvia Martin","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2023.101015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"70 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Ideas in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X23000089","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么在心理治疗中使用“意识”?洞察力,元认知和自我意识
自早期发展以来,临床心理学一直质疑“意识”对精神障碍中人类责任确定的影响。近年来,特定的临床方法集中在“意识”工作上,这可能在心理治疗中发挥关键作用。我们重点研究了临床心理学中与意识相关的洞察力、自我意识和元认知概念。例如,作为认知和行为治疗领域最新进展的代表,洞察力和元认知促使人们对精神分裂症(SZ)、双相情感障碍(BD)以及最近的边缘型人格障碍(BPD)治疗越来越感兴趣。在这里,我们回顾了认知、社会和临床心理学研究,测量了BPD、SZ和BD中的“意识”,探讨了类似意识概念的不同概念化对治疗依从性、症状演变和心理治疗的相关方面的影响。我们的研究结果显示了使用临床和认知洞察力测量的总体相关性,强调了认知洞察力和元认知在心理治疗中的更核心作用,因为如果将意识理解为一种认知技能,它似乎仍然有用。纳入自我意识的概念对于解决心理治疗的社会成分很重要,就像在生物心理社会方法中一样。我们讨论了这些结果对全球疗效的影响,对“意识”概念与临床心理学的相关性的影响,以及在心理治疗中不断操作不同概念的潜在需要。我们将关于意识定义的辩论从变革的动机方面以及法律和伦理方面的一般考虑开始。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: New Ideas in Psychology is a journal for theoretical psychology in its broadest sense. We are looking for new and seminal ideas, from within Psychology and from other fields that have something to bring to Psychology. We welcome presentations and criticisms of theory, of background metaphysics, and of fundamental issues of method, both empirical and conceptual. We put special emphasis on the need for informed discussion of psychological theories to be interdisciplinary. Empirical papers are accepted at New Ideas in Psychology, but only as long as they focus on conceptual issues and are theoretically creative. We are also open to comments or debate, interviews, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
True grit? The perception of a partner's effort boosts cognitive control to sustain commitment in joint action Holographic projection created by wavefunction interference of ions at the neuronal membrane as a potential method of generating mental imagery Accumulated evidence as an additive performance measure based on confidence ratings Meta-metacognition: Processes underlying judgments about metacognition Can artificial intelligence assistance enhance creativity in university students? An experimental study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1