Balancing academics and athletics: School-level athletes’ results are positively associated with their academic performance

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Trends in Neuroscience and Education Pub Date : 2023-09-09 DOI:10.1016/j.tine.2023.100210
Yuta Kuroda , Toru Ishihara , Keita Kamijo
{"title":"Balancing academics and athletics: School-level athletes’ results are positively associated with their academic performance","authors":"Yuta Kuroda ,&nbsp;Toru Ishihara ,&nbsp;Keita Kamijo","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2023.100210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Using data from a nationwide high-school sample, the present study aimed to examine whether school-level athletes’ sporting results are positively or negatively associated with their academic performance.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Athletic performance was assessed using the results of spring and summer regional qualifying interschool tennis tournaments in Japan among both male and female tournaments across all prefectures in Japan. Academic performance was assessed using the standardized rank scores for academic performance at the school level, with higher scores denoting superior academic levels; this is the most common measure of academic performance in Japanese high schools. Linear mixed models were conducted to compare the academic performance of high schools with winning and losing records, respectively, for all games together and for the spring and summer tournaments separately. The results of a total of 4,870 games were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>High schools with winning records showed a significantly higher academic-performance score than those with losing records, and this association was stronger among boys than girls. The observed difference in academic-performance scores between the schools with winning and losing records, respectively, was replicated in both tournament settings (i.e., spring and summer).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Athletic results are positively associated with academic performance at the school level. Given the cross-sectional nature of the present study, the present results do not necessarily imply that sports participation can improve academic performance; rather, the present study suggests that balancing academic and athletic commitments is feasible.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949323000133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Using data from a nationwide high-school sample, the present study aimed to examine whether school-level athletes’ sporting results are positively or negatively associated with their academic performance.

Methods

Athletic performance was assessed using the results of spring and summer regional qualifying interschool tennis tournaments in Japan among both male and female tournaments across all prefectures in Japan. Academic performance was assessed using the standardized rank scores for academic performance at the school level, with higher scores denoting superior academic levels; this is the most common measure of academic performance in Japanese high schools. Linear mixed models were conducted to compare the academic performance of high schools with winning and losing records, respectively, for all games together and for the spring and summer tournaments separately. The results of a total of 4,870 games were analyzed.

Results

High schools with winning records showed a significantly higher academic-performance score than those with losing records, and this association was stronger among boys than girls. The observed difference in academic-performance scores between the schools with winning and losing records, respectively, was replicated in both tournament settings (i.e., spring and summer).

Conclusions

Athletic results are positively associated with academic performance at the school level. Given the cross-sectional nature of the present study, the present results do not necessarily imply that sports participation can improve academic performance; rather, the present study suggests that balancing academic and athletic commitments is feasible.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平衡学业与运动:校级运动员的成绩与其学业表现呈正相关
背景利用来自全国高中样本的数据,本研究旨在检验学校级别运动员的运动成绩与他们的学习成绩是正相关还是负相关。方法采用日本春季和夏季地区资格赛校际网球锦标赛的结果,在日本所有县的男女锦标赛中评估运动成绩。学业成绩采用学校一级学业成绩的标准化等级分数进行评估,分数越高表示学业水平越高;这是衡量日本高中学习成绩最常见的指标。采用线性混合模型将高中的学习成绩与所有比赛以及春季和夏季锦标赛的输球记录进行比较。对总共4870场比赛的结果进行了分析。结果有获胜记录的高中的学习成绩得分明显高于有失败记录的高中,而且这种关联在男孩中比女孩更强。在两个锦标赛环境(即春季和夏季)中,分别有获胜和失败记录的学校之间的学习成绩差异得到了复制。结论体育成绩与学校水平的学习成绩呈正相关。鉴于本研究的横断面性质,目前的结果并不一定意味着体育参与可以提高学习成绩;相反,目前的研究表明,平衡学术和体育承诺是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
65 days
期刊最新文献
Applying the science of learning to teacher professional development and back again: Lessons from 3 country contexts Mirror invariance in the subsequent acquisition of a script with separate forms for reading and writing Executive functions as predictors of learning prerequisites in preschool: A longitudinal study Integrating vision and somatosensation does not improve the accuracy and response time when estimating area and perimeter of rectangles in primary school The whole is greater than the sum of its parts: Using cognitive profiles to predict academic achievement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1