What is the influence of negative pressure wound therapy on high-risk wounds in pelvic oncology?

Motaz AlAqeel , Amirul Adlan , Lee Jeys , Jonathan Stevenson
{"title":"What is the influence of negative pressure wound therapy on high-risk wounds in pelvic oncology?","authors":"Motaz AlAqeel ,&nbsp;Amirul Adlan ,&nbsp;Lee Jeys ,&nbsp;Jonathan Stevenson","doi":"10.1016/j.cson.2023.100015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>&amp; Aims: Hindquarter amputation (HQA) has a high incidence of post-operative wound complications. We aim to use the HQA procedure as a model to investigate the potential advantages of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) on wound healing complications in high-risk pelvic oncology wounds.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing HQA between January 2009 and November 2020 ​at a single tertiary centre. 106 patients underwent HQA for sarcoma. 43.4% (46 patients) had NPWT therapy following HQA. We compared the incidence of wound complications necessitating a return to the operating theatre, total incidence of wound infection (according to CDC Surgical site infection guidelines) and local recurrence between patients with and without NPWT.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the absence of neo-adjuvant radiotherapy, there was no difference in the incidence of wound complications requiring re-operation between the NPWT group and the conventional dressing group (odds ratio [OR], 1.01; p ​= ​0.983, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.365–2.8). However, the use of NPWT decreased the incidence of reoperation after neo-adjuvant radiotherapy versus conventional dressings [OR], 0.087; p ​= ​0.033, 95% CI, 0.009–0.818). The incidence of wound infection has declined with the increasing use of NPWT between 2009 and 2020. There was no difference in the incidence of local recurrence after two years between patient groups with and without NPWT.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The application of NPWT reduces the incidence of wound complications in high-risk pelvic oncology wounds after neo-adjuvant radiotherapy. We demonstrated a reduction in the incidence of reoperation due to wound complications in patients who received NPWT following HQA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100015"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X23000077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

& Aims: Hindquarter amputation (HQA) has a high incidence of post-operative wound complications. We aim to use the HQA procedure as a model to investigate the potential advantages of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) on wound healing complications in high-risk pelvic oncology wounds.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing HQA between January 2009 and November 2020 ​at a single tertiary centre. 106 patients underwent HQA for sarcoma. 43.4% (46 patients) had NPWT therapy following HQA. We compared the incidence of wound complications necessitating a return to the operating theatre, total incidence of wound infection (according to CDC Surgical site infection guidelines) and local recurrence between patients with and without NPWT.

Results

In the absence of neo-adjuvant radiotherapy, there was no difference in the incidence of wound complications requiring re-operation between the NPWT group and the conventional dressing group (odds ratio [OR], 1.01; p ​= ​0.983, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.365–2.8). However, the use of NPWT decreased the incidence of reoperation after neo-adjuvant radiotherapy versus conventional dressings [OR], 0.087; p ​= ​0.033, 95% CI, 0.009–0.818). The incidence of wound infection has declined with the increasing use of NPWT between 2009 and 2020. There was no difference in the incidence of local recurrence after two years between patient groups with and without NPWT.

Conclusion

The application of NPWT reduces the incidence of wound complications in high-risk pelvic oncology wounds after neo-adjuvant radiotherapy. We demonstrated a reduction in the incidence of reoperation due to wound complications in patients who received NPWT following HQA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
负压创面治疗对盆腔肿瘤高危创面有何影响?
简介&;目的:后足截肢(HQA)术后伤口并发症发生率高。我们的目的是使用HQA程序作为模型来研究负压伤口治疗(NPWT)在高危盆腔肿瘤伤口愈合并发症方面的潜在优势。方法我们对2009年1月至2020年11月期间接受HQA的所有患者进行了回顾性分析​在一个高等教育中心。106例患者接受HQA治疗肉瘤。43.4%(46例)的患者在HQA后接受了NPWT治疗。我们比较了NPWT患者和非NPWT患者需要返回手术室的伤口并发症的发生率、伤口感染的总发生率(根据美国疾病控制与预防中心手术部位感染指南)和局部复发率。结果在没有新辅助放疗的情况下,NPWT组和传统敷料组需要再次手术的伤口并发症发生率没有差异(比值比[OR],1.01;p​=​0.983,95%置信区间[CI],0.365–2.8)。然而,与传统敷料相比,使用NPWT降低了新辅助放疗后再次手术的发生率[OR],0.087;p​=​0.033,95%CI,0.009–0.818)。2009年至2020年间,随着NPWT使用的增加,伤口感染的发生率有所下降。有和没有NPWT的患者组两年后局部复发的发生率没有差异。结论NPWT的应用降低了新辅助放疗后高危盆腔肿瘤伤口并发症的发生率。我们证明,在HQA后接受NPWT的患者中,由于伤口并发症而再次手术的发生率降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Surgical frontiers in metastatic disease: Shaping cancer care Individualized surgical approach based on Bismuth-Corlette classification for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma Liquid biopsy for monitoring minimal residual disease in colorectal cancer: A promising approach with clinical implications Diagnostic sensitivity of immune-inflammatory cell proportion in early diagnosis of endometrial cancer Chinese expert consensus on the pelvic exenteration for primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes and locally recurrent rectal cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1