{"title":"Protection Techniques using Resource Delayed Release for SDN-based OTN over WDM Networks","authors":"Shideh Yavary Mehr , Byrav Ramamurthy","doi":"10.1016/j.osn.2023.100762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The availability and reliability of optical backbone links are very important to ensure the efficient operation of the Internet. To address the issue of data loss due to optical link<span> failures, there is a need for an optimal recovery strategy so that the traffic can be rerouted on a backup path to the destination. This paper builds on top of our prior research efforts (Yavary Mehr et al., 2022; Zhou et al., 2017) which introduced the concept of Resource Delayed Release (RDR) by adding a new state called ”idle state” which begins when the channel has completed carrying its services so that the next request can be carried immediately instead of waiting for a new channel to be established. While RDR improves the network performance by reducing the service provisioning time and blocking probability<span>, it does not handle link failures which are quite common in optical networks. Therefore, enhancing RDR with protection strategies will make the network more reliable and thus we investigate this topic in this work.</span></span></p><p><span>In this paper, we evaluate four different protection methods for single link failure recovery in WDM networks (Path Protection (PP), Partial Path Protection (PPP), Segment Protection (SegP) and </span>Link Protection<span> (LP)) with two different routing approaches namely Shortest Path (SPath) and Greedy (G) algorithm under uniform and non-uniform traffic generated using real traffic traces collected from a local Internet Service Provider (ISP). Special attention while evaluating these protection strategies was paid to the optimization of the amount of remaining bandwidth. The performance evaluation of the network under uniform and non-uniform traffic was done over the NSFNet and COST239 topologies by employing the metrics of link and network utilization, Blocking Probability (BP), Bandwidth Blocking Probability (BBP), Recovery Time (RT) and Service Provisioning Time (SPT). Our results show that the PPP method performs the best in terms of reducing BP, BBP, and SPT compared with PP, LP, and SegP in all three topologies while utilizing RDR.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":54674,"journal":{"name":"Optical Switching and Networking","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 100762"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optical Switching and Networking","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1573427723000334","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The availability and reliability of optical backbone links are very important to ensure the efficient operation of the Internet. To address the issue of data loss due to optical link failures, there is a need for an optimal recovery strategy so that the traffic can be rerouted on a backup path to the destination. This paper builds on top of our prior research efforts (Yavary Mehr et al., 2022; Zhou et al., 2017) which introduced the concept of Resource Delayed Release (RDR) by adding a new state called ”idle state” which begins when the channel has completed carrying its services so that the next request can be carried immediately instead of waiting for a new channel to be established. While RDR improves the network performance by reducing the service provisioning time and blocking probability, it does not handle link failures which are quite common in optical networks. Therefore, enhancing RDR with protection strategies will make the network more reliable and thus we investigate this topic in this work.
In this paper, we evaluate four different protection methods for single link failure recovery in WDM networks (Path Protection (PP), Partial Path Protection (PPP), Segment Protection (SegP) and Link Protection (LP)) with two different routing approaches namely Shortest Path (SPath) and Greedy (G) algorithm under uniform and non-uniform traffic generated using real traffic traces collected from a local Internet Service Provider (ISP). Special attention while evaluating these protection strategies was paid to the optimization of the amount of remaining bandwidth. The performance evaluation of the network under uniform and non-uniform traffic was done over the NSFNet and COST239 topologies by employing the metrics of link and network utilization, Blocking Probability (BP), Bandwidth Blocking Probability (BBP), Recovery Time (RT) and Service Provisioning Time (SPT). Our results show that the PPP method performs the best in terms of reducing BP, BBP, and SPT compared with PP, LP, and SegP in all three topologies while utilizing RDR.
光骨干链路的可用性和可靠性对于确保互联网的高效运行非常重要。为了解决由于光链路故障导致的数据丢失问题,需要一种最佳的恢复策略,以便可以在备份路径上将流量重新路由到目的地。本文建立在我们先前研究工作的基础上(Yavary-Mehr et al.,2022;Zhou et al.,2017),该研究通过添加一种称为“空闲状态”的新状态引入了资源延迟释放(RDR)的概念,该状态在信道完成承载其服务时开始,以便可以立即承载下一个请求,而不是等待建立新的信道。虽然RDR通过减少服务提供时间和阻塞概率来提高网络性能,但它不能处理在光网络中很常见的链路故障。因此,通过保护策略来增强RDR将使网络更加可靠,因此我们在本工作中对此进行了研究。本文评估了WDM网络中四种不同的单链路故障恢复保护方法(路径保护(PP)、部分路径保护(PPP)、,分段保护(SegP)和链路保护(LP)),具有两种不同的路由方法,即在使用从本地互联网服务提供商(ISP)收集的真实流量跟踪生成的均匀和非均匀流量下的最短路径(SPath)和贪婪(G)算法。在评估这些保护策略时,特别注意剩余带宽的优化。通过采用链路和网络利用率、阻塞概率(BP)、带宽阻塞概率(BBP)、恢复时间(RT)和服务提供时间(SPT)等指标,在NSFNet和COST239拓扑结构上对均匀和非均匀流量下的网络性能进行了评估。我们的结果表明,与PP、LP和SegP相比,在使用RDR的所有三种拓扑中,PPP方法在降低BP、BBP和SPT方面表现最好。
期刊介绍:
Optical Switching and Networking (OSN) is an archival journal aiming to provide complete coverage of all topics of interest to those involved in the optical and high-speed opto-electronic networking areas. The editorial board is committed to providing detailed, constructive feedback to submitted papers, as well as a fast turn-around time.
Optical Switching and Networking considers high-quality, original, and unpublished contributions addressing all aspects of optical and opto-electronic networks. Specific areas of interest include, but are not limited to:
• Optical and Opto-Electronic Backbone, Metropolitan and Local Area Networks
• Optical Data Center Networks
• Elastic optical networks
• Green Optical Networks
• Software Defined Optical Networks
• Novel Multi-layer Architectures and Protocols (Ethernet, Internet, Physical Layer)
• Optical Networks for Interet of Things (IOT)
• Home Networks, In-Vehicle Networks, and Other Short-Reach Networks
• Optical Access Networks
• Optical Data Center Interconnection Systems
• Optical OFDM and coherent optical network systems
• Free Space Optics (FSO) networks
• Hybrid Fiber - Wireless Networks
• Optical Satellite Networks
• Visible Light Communication Networks
• Optical Storage Networks
• Optical Network Security
• Optical Network Resiliance and Reliability
• Control Plane Issues and Signaling Protocols
• Optical Quality of Service (OQoS) and Impairment Monitoring
• Optical Layer Anycast, Broadcast and Multicast
• Optical Network Applications, Testbeds and Experimental Networks
• Optical Network for Science and High Performance Computing Networks