An evaluation of a catch and release trout regulation in Rapid Creek, South Dakota

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Aquaculture and Fisheries Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.aaf.2020.04.004
Jacob L. Davis
{"title":"An evaluation of a catch and release trout regulation in Rapid Creek, South Dakota","authors":"Jacob L. Davis","doi":"10.1016/j.aaf.2020.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Often, catch and release regulations are meant to maximize a fisheries potential to create trophy fish. I evaluated adult Brown Trout populations at five locations within Rapid Creek within Rapid City, SD over a two-year period. In each year, one of these locations was within a catch and release area, while two were outside. In 2012, density and biomass estimates were higher in a site located outside of the catch and release area. Additionally, size structure within the catch and release area was only significantly larger than one of the two sites outside of the regulation area. Mean relative weight values were inversely related to density estimates, with the lowest density sites having the highest mean relative weights. Similarly, a site outside of the catch and release area had the highest abundance and biomass estimates in 2013. The cumulative length distribution was significantly different between the site within the catch and release area and the two located outside. Relative weight was significantly higher in the catch and release area than the two sites outside. As population characteristics within the catch and release area were not consistently better than outside, it is more likely that factors such as habitat and density dependence are impacting the Brown Trout population more than the regulation itself.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36894,"journal":{"name":"Aquaculture and Fisheries","volume":"8 5","pages":"Pages 558-563"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aaf.2020.04.004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquaculture and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"1091","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468550X20300460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Often, catch and release regulations are meant to maximize a fisheries potential to create trophy fish. I evaluated adult Brown Trout populations at five locations within Rapid Creek within Rapid City, SD over a two-year period. In each year, one of these locations was within a catch and release area, while two were outside. In 2012, density and biomass estimates were higher in a site located outside of the catch and release area. Additionally, size structure within the catch and release area was only significantly larger than one of the two sites outside of the regulation area. Mean relative weight values were inversely related to density estimates, with the lowest density sites having the highest mean relative weights. Similarly, a site outside of the catch and release area had the highest abundance and biomass estimates in 2013. The cumulative length distribution was significantly different between the site within the catch and release area and the two located outside. Relative weight was significantly higher in the catch and release area than the two sites outside. As population characteristics within the catch and release area were not consistently better than outside, it is more likely that factors such as habitat and density dependence are impacting the Brown Trout population more than the regulation itself.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南达科塔州拉皮德溪鳟鱼捕捞和释放法规的评估
通常,捕捞和释放法规旨在最大限度地发挥渔业潜力,创造战利品鱼。我在两年的时间里评估了SD拉皮德市拉皮德溪五个地点的成年褐鳟种群。每年,其中一个地点在捕获和释放区内,而两个地点在外面。2012年,位于捕获和释放区以外的地点的密度和生物量估计值较高。此外,捕获和释放区内的尺寸结构仅明显大于监管区外两个地点中的一个。平均相对权重值与密度估计值呈负相关,密度最低的站点具有最高的平均相对权重。同样,2013年,捕捞和释放区以外的一个地点的丰度和生物量估计值最高。捕获和释放区内的站点与位于捕获和释放区域外的站点之间的累积长度分布显著不同。捕获和释放区的相对重量明显高于外部两个地点。由于捕获和释放区内的种群特征并不总是比外部好,因此栖息地和密度依赖性等因素对褐鳟种群的影响可能比调节本身更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aquaculture and Fisheries
Aquaculture and Fisheries Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Aquatic Science
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
48 days
期刊最新文献
Stability analysis of reef fish communities based on symbiotic graph model Effects of microbe-derived antioxidants on growth, digestive and aminotransferase activities, and antioxidant capacities in the hepatopancreas of Eriocheir sinensis under ammonia nitrogen stress Synergistic effects of Recirculating Aquaculture System (RAS) with combination of clear water, probiotic and biofloc technology: A review Biofloc system supplemented by Pseudoalteromonas piscicida 1Ub protects the Pacific white shrimp Penaeus vannamei from Vibrio parahaemolyticus infection Used vs. new: Does it have consequences for the performance of fishing gear?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1