Comparative analysis of lean and agile supply chain strategies for effective vaccine distribution in pandemics: A case study of COVID-19 in a densely populated developing region

Kasuni R.R. Gomes , H. Niles Perera , Amila Thibbotuwawa , N.P. Sunil-Chandra
{"title":"Comparative analysis of lean and agile supply chain strategies for effective vaccine distribution in pandemics: A case study of COVID-19 in a densely populated developing region","authors":"Kasuni R.R. Gomes ,&nbsp;H. Niles Perera ,&nbsp;Amila Thibbotuwawa ,&nbsp;N.P. Sunil-Chandra","doi":"10.1016/j.sca.2023.100022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Mass vaccination programs should employ effective strategies to design a resilient vaccine supply chain for immunizing populations quickly and efficiently. The need for more flexible and responsive vaccine supply chain design is highlighted during the pandemic, where authorities are required to effectively execute vaccine distribution. Our study proposes a scientifically driven approach to identify suitable supply chain strategies for vaccine distribution, enhancing the effectiveness of mass vaccination. We propose a two-stage approach for identifying the best supply chain strategy that supports faster vaccine rollouts, reducing infections and deaths during the pandemic. We optimize the vaccine distribution network under both supply chain strategies using Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) for four disruption scenarios in the first stage. Second, we have used systems dynamics simulation and the Susceptible-Exposed-Infectious-Recovered (SEIR) model for pandemics to identify the impact of vaccination. In all disruption scenarios, vaccine distribution using the Lean strategy is less costly, and the Agile strategy reduces lead time and supports faster vaccine rollout. We show achieving a cost-saving or lead-time saving using either supply chain strategy becomes increasingly difficult when the severity of disruptions at storage increases. Our study suggests a novel methodology that determines the most suitable strategy for vaccine distribution which minimizes infections and deaths under several disruption scenarios. The decision-makers can identify appropriate supply chain strategies for vaccine delivery to densely populated developing regions, using the proposed framework which compares supply chain strategies’ impact on vaccine distribution network design.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101186,"journal":{"name":"Supply Chain Analytics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supply Chain Analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949863523000213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Mass vaccination programs should employ effective strategies to design a resilient vaccine supply chain for immunizing populations quickly and efficiently. The need for more flexible and responsive vaccine supply chain design is highlighted during the pandemic, where authorities are required to effectively execute vaccine distribution. Our study proposes a scientifically driven approach to identify suitable supply chain strategies for vaccine distribution, enhancing the effectiveness of mass vaccination. We propose a two-stage approach for identifying the best supply chain strategy that supports faster vaccine rollouts, reducing infections and deaths during the pandemic. We optimize the vaccine distribution network under both supply chain strategies using Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) for four disruption scenarios in the first stage. Second, we have used systems dynamics simulation and the Susceptible-Exposed-Infectious-Recovered (SEIR) model for pandemics to identify the impact of vaccination. In all disruption scenarios, vaccine distribution using the Lean strategy is less costly, and the Agile strategy reduces lead time and supports faster vaccine rollout. We show achieving a cost-saving or lead-time saving using either supply chain strategy becomes increasingly difficult when the severity of disruptions at storage increases. Our study suggests a novel methodology that determines the most suitable strategy for vaccine distribution which minimizes infections and deaths under several disruption scenarios. The decision-makers can identify appropriate supply chain strategies for vaccine delivery to densely populated developing regions, using the proposed framework which compares supply chain strategies’ impact on vaccine distribution network design.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大流行期间疫苗有效配送的精益供应链与敏捷供应链策略对比分析——以人口密集发展中地区COVID-19为例
大规模疫苗接种计划应采用有效的策略来设计一个有弹性的疫苗供应链,以便快速有效地为人群免疫。在疫情期间,需要更灵活、反应更灵敏的疫苗供应链设计,要求当局有效执行疫苗分发。我们的研究提出了一种科学驱动的方法,以确定合适的疫苗分发供应链策略,提高大规模疫苗接种的有效性。我们提出了一种分两阶段的方法来确定最佳供应链战略,以支持更快地推出疫苗,减少疫情期间的感染和死亡。在第一阶段,我们使用混合整数规划(MIP)优化了两种供应链策略下的疫苗分销网络,用于四种中断场景。其次,我们使用系统动力学模拟和流行病的易感暴露传染病恢复(SEIR)模型来确定疫苗接种的影响。在所有中断场景中,使用精益战略的疫苗分发成本较低,敏捷战略缩短了交付周期,并支持更快地推出疫苗。我们表明,当存储中断的严重程度增加时,使用任何一种供应链策略来实现成本节约或交付周期节约都变得越来越困难。我们的研究提出了一种新的方法,可以确定最合适的疫苗分发策略,在几种中断情况下最大限度地减少感染和死亡。决策者可以使用所提出的比较供应链战略对疫苗分销网络设计影响的框架,确定向人口稠密的发展中地区交付疫苗的适当供应链战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A systematic review of supply chain analytics for targeted ads in E-commerce An integrated supply chain network design for advanced air mobility aircraft manufacturing using stochastic optimization A comparative assessment of holt winter exponential smoothing and autoregressive integrated moving average for inventory optimization in supply chains Editorial Board An explainable artificial intelligence model for predictive maintenance and spare parts optimization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1