When is it wise to use artificial intelligence for platform operations considering consumer returns?

IF 6 2区 管理学 Q1 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE European Journal of Operational Research Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2022.11.036
Xiaoping Xu , Zhaofu Hong , Yujing Chen , T.C.E. Cheng
{"title":"When is it wise to use artificial intelligence for platform operations considering consumer returns?","authors":"Xiaoping Xu ,&nbsp;Zhaofu Hong ,&nbsp;Yujing Chen ,&nbsp;T.C.E. Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2022.11.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We consider a supply chain comprising a manufacturer and a platform, where the former sells its products through an offline channel and the latter. The platform has two operational modes, namely the marketplace and reselling modes. Platform power refers to the platform's ability to increase the market size, while network effects concern the platform's effect on the offline channel. Consumers may return dissatisfied products brought from the platform within a return window. Without artificial intelligence (AI), the optimal production quantities in both the marketplace and reselling modes increase (decrease) with the platform power under low (high) network effects. The optimal profit of the manufacturer in the marketplace mode increases with the platform power and the direction may be positive in the reselling mode. With AI, the optimal profits of the manufacturer in the two modes always increase with the platform power. Comparing the cases with and without AI, we find that using AI in the marketplace mode increases (decreases) the manufacturer's profit under low (high) network effects. And using AI in the reselling mode increases (decreases) the platform's profit under low (high) network effects. With and without AI, the marketplace mode cannot coordinate the supply chain, while the reselling mode can. We also extend our work by considering several cases to check the robustness of the results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55161,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Operational Research","volume":"308 3","pages":"Pages 1188-1205"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Operational Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221722008931","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We consider a supply chain comprising a manufacturer and a platform, where the former sells its products through an offline channel and the latter. The platform has two operational modes, namely the marketplace and reselling modes. Platform power refers to the platform's ability to increase the market size, while network effects concern the platform's effect on the offline channel. Consumers may return dissatisfied products brought from the platform within a return window. Without artificial intelligence (AI), the optimal production quantities in both the marketplace and reselling modes increase (decrease) with the platform power under low (high) network effects. The optimal profit of the manufacturer in the marketplace mode increases with the platform power and the direction may be positive in the reselling mode. With AI, the optimal profits of the manufacturer in the two modes always increase with the platform power. Comparing the cases with and without AI, we find that using AI in the marketplace mode increases (decreases) the manufacturer's profit under low (high) network effects. And using AI in the reselling mode increases (decreases) the platform's profit under low (high) network effects. With and without AI, the marketplace mode cannot coordinate the supply chain, while the reselling mode can. We also extend our work by considering several cases to check the robustness of the results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑到消费者的回报,什么时候使用人工智能进行平台运营是明智的?
我们考虑一个由制造商和平台组成的供应链,前者通过线下渠道销售产品,后者通过线下途径销售产品。该平台有两种运营模式,即市场和转售模式。平台力量是指平台增加市场规模的能力,而网络效应是指平台对线下渠道的影响。消费者可以在退货窗口内退货平台带来的不满意产品。在没有人工智能(AI)的情况下,在低(高)网络效应下,市场和转售模式中的最佳生产量都会随着平台功率的增加而增加(减少)。制造商在市场模式下的最佳利润随着平台力量的增加而增加,并且在转售模式下方向可能是正的。有了人工智能,制造商在这两种模式下的最优利润总是随着平台力量的增加而增加。比较有和没有人工智能的情况,我们发现在低(高)网络效应下,在市场模式中使用人工智能会增加(减少)制造商的利润。在低(高)网络效应下,在转售模式中使用人工智能会增加(减少)平台的利润。无论有没有人工智能,市场模式都无法协调供应链,而转售模式可以。我们还通过考虑几个案例来扩展我们的工作,以检查结果的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Operational Research
European Journal of Operational Research 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
9.40%
发文量
786
审稿时长
8.2 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Operational Research (EJOR) publishes high quality, original papers that contribute to the methodology of operational research (OR) and to the practice of decision making.
期刊最新文献
A new real option methodology for the quality-by-design pharmaceutical research and development Factor Models and Mutually Exciting Jump Processes for Financial Systemic Risk Simulation-Optimization Approaches for the Network Immunization Problem with Quarantining Zeroth-Order Feedback-Based Optimization for Distributed Energy Management Assessing eco-efficiency in global supply chains: an extended DEA approach with dimensionality-adjusted decomposition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1