Groundwater salinity and irrigation suitability in low-lying coastal areas. A case of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Timoth Mkilima
{"title":"Groundwater salinity and irrigation suitability in low-lying coastal areas. A case of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania","authors":"Timoth Mkilima","doi":"10.1016/j.wsee.2023.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Groundwater salinity is a crucial factor that can impact soil structure and plant water uptake, potentially posing a threat to agricultural productivity. This study focused on assessing the salinity hazard of groundwater in low-lying coastal zones, specifically in Dar es Salaam. Thirty four boreholes were examined, and six water quality parameters (magnesium, calcium, sodium, potassium, total dissolved solids and electrical conductivity) were analyzed to investigate the feasibility of using groundwater for irrigation. Sodium adsorption ratio indices were calculated and employed to construct the Wilcox diagram, which played a crucial role in determining the groundwater suitability for irrigation. The concentrations obtained from the analysis of water quality parameters were compared to the permissible limits recommended by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Based on the Sodium Adsorption Ratio analysis, 14.7% of the examined samples were assigned to class one (S1), indicating irrigation-worthy water quality with minimal risk of harmful salt accumulation in the soil. On the other hand, 32.4% of the samples were categorized as class two (S2), indicating water suitable for irrigation with a significant risk that can be effectively managed. Additionally, 17.6% of the sampling points were classified as class three (S3), signifying water unsuitable for most crops. Lastly, 35.3% of the samples fell into class four (S4), suggesting water quality generally unsuitable for irrigation purposes. The analysis indicated that 94% of the samples exceeded 2250 µs/cm, classifying them as C4, indicating extremely high salinity levels rendering them unsuitable for irrigation. This study underscores the importance of conducting comprehensive research before utilizing groundwater for irrigation in low-lying coastal zones.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101280,"journal":{"name":"Watershed Ecology and the Environment","volume":"5 ","pages":"Pages 173-185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Watershed Ecology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589471423000177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Groundwater salinity is a crucial factor that can impact soil structure and plant water uptake, potentially posing a threat to agricultural productivity. This study focused on assessing the salinity hazard of groundwater in low-lying coastal zones, specifically in Dar es Salaam. Thirty four boreholes were examined, and six water quality parameters (magnesium, calcium, sodium, potassium, total dissolved solids and electrical conductivity) were analyzed to investigate the feasibility of using groundwater for irrigation. Sodium adsorption ratio indices were calculated and employed to construct the Wilcox diagram, which played a crucial role in determining the groundwater suitability for irrigation. The concentrations obtained from the analysis of water quality parameters were compared to the permissible limits recommended by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Based on the Sodium Adsorption Ratio analysis, 14.7% of the examined samples were assigned to class one (S1), indicating irrigation-worthy water quality with minimal risk of harmful salt accumulation in the soil. On the other hand, 32.4% of the samples were categorized as class two (S2), indicating water suitable for irrigation with a significant risk that can be effectively managed. Additionally, 17.6% of the sampling points were classified as class three (S3), signifying water unsuitable for most crops. Lastly, 35.3% of the samples fell into class four (S4), suggesting water quality generally unsuitable for irrigation purposes. The analysis indicated that 94% of the samples exceeded 2250 µs/cm, classifying them as C4, indicating extremely high salinity levels rendering them unsuitable for irrigation. This study underscores the importance of conducting comprehensive research before utilizing groundwater for irrigation in low-lying coastal zones.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沿海低洼地区地下水盐度与灌溉适宜性。坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆的一个案例
地下水盐度是影响土壤结构和植物吸水的关键因素,可能对农业生产力构成威胁。这项研究的重点是评估低洼沿海地区,特别是达累斯萨拉姆的地下水的盐度危害。对34个钻孔进行了检查,并分析了6个水质参数(镁、钙、钠、钾、总溶解固体和电导率),以调查使用地下水灌溉的可行性。计算了钠吸附率指标,并将其用于构建威尔科克斯图,该图在确定地下水灌溉适宜性方面起着至关重要的作用。通过分析水质参数获得的浓度与联合国粮食及农业组织建议的允许限值进行了比较。根据钠吸附率分析,14.7%的检测样本被分配到一级(S1),这表明适合灌溉的水质,土壤中有害盐积累的风险最小。另一方面,32.4%的样本被归类为第二类(S2),这表明适合灌溉的水具有可以有效管理的重大风险。此外,17.6%的采样点被归类为第三类(S3),这意味着水不适合大多数作物。最后,35.3%的样本属于第四类(S4),这表明水质通常不适合灌溉。分析表明,94%的样本超过2250µs/cm,被归类为C4,表明盐度极高,不适合灌溉。这项研究强调了在利用地下水灌溉低洼沿海地区之前进行全面研究的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Simulation of wetland vegetation succession based on coupled Gaussian and population dynamics models: A case study of Poyang Lake wetlands Morphometric analysis of watersheds: A comprehensive review of data sources, quality, and geospatial techniques Flash flood susceptibility mapping of north-east depression of Bangladesh using different GIS based bivariate statistical models Source, fate, toxicity, and remediation of micro-plastic in wetlands: A critical review Effects of Spartina alterniflora control on soil carbon and nitrogen in coastal wetlands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1