Understanding EFL students’ feedback literacy development in academic writing: A longitudinal case study

IF 4.2 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Assessing Writing Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100770
Fuhui Zhang , Hui-Tzu Min , Ping He , Sisi Chen , Shan Ren
{"title":"Understanding EFL students’ feedback literacy development in academic writing: A longitudinal case study","authors":"Fuhui Zhang ,&nbsp;Hui-Tzu Min ,&nbsp;Ping He ,&nbsp;Sisi Chen ,&nbsp;Shan Ren","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2023.100770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although many studies have elaborated the nature and importance of feedback literacy, a longitudinal approach to delving into the development of EFL students’ feedback literacy is scarce. Informed by an evidence-based framework of feedback literacy improvement in the context of academic writing (<span>Yu &amp; Liu, 2021</span>), the study explored the development of feedback literacy of three first-year students who studied English as a Foreign Language (EFL) in understanding, evaluating, reflecting on, and using peer feedback and their emotional responses during a semester-long online writing program. By analyzing students’ voiced peer feedback, written drafts, immediate reflections after peer feedback, monthly reflection journals, end-of-term stimulated recalls and interviews, we found positive changes in their cognitive, behavioral, and emotional capacities in response to peer feedback, and increasing improvement in students’ assessment criteria knowledge through self-reflections after peer feedback, incorporation of peer feedback and reflections into revision. However, students did not develop at the same pace due to personal factors. Variations in students’ reflections and proactive actions were found in relation to the development of feedback literacy evidenced in their revision improvement. Implications for pedagogical facilitation of peer feedback literacy and use of peer feedback in revision in academic writing are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 100770"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessing Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293523000788","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Although many studies have elaborated the nature and importance of feedback literacy, a longitudinal approach to delving into the development of EFL students’ feedback literacy is scarce. Informed by an evidence-based framework of feedback literacy improvement in the context of academic writing (Yu & Liu, 2021), the study explored the development of feedback literacy of three first-year students who studied English as a Foreign Language (EFL) in understanding, evaluating, reflecting on, and using peer feedback and their emotional responses during a semester-long online writing program. By analyzing students’ voiced peer feedback, written drafts, immediate reflections after peer feedback, monthly reflection journals, end-of-term stimulated recalls and interviews, we found positive changes in their cognitive, behavioral, and emotional capacities in response to peer feedback, and increasing improvement in students’ assessment criteria knowledge through self-reflections after peer feedback, incorporation of peer feedback and reflections into revision. However, students did not develop at the same pace due to personal factors. Variations in students’ reflections and proactive actions were found in relation to the development of feedback literacy evidenced in their revision improvement. Implications for pedagogical facilitation of peer feedback literacy and use of peer feedback in revision in academic writing are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解EFL学生在学术写作中的反馈素养发展:一个纵向案例研究
尽管许多研究已经阐述了反馈素养的性质和重要性,但很少有纵向方法来深入研究EFL学生反馈素养的发展。根据学术写作背景下反馈素养提高的循证框架(Yu&;Liu,2021),本研究探讨了三名学习英语(EFL)的一年级学生在理解、评估、反思、,以及在一个为期一学期的在线写作项目中使用同伴的反馈和他们的情绪反应。通过分析学生的口头同伴反馈、书面草稿、同伴反馈后的即时反思、每月反思日志、期末刺激回忆和访谈,我们发现他们对同伴反馈的认知、行为和情绪能力发生了积极变化,通过同伴反馈后的自我反思、将同伴反馈和反思纳入复习中,提高学生的评估标准知识。然而,由于个人因素,学生们并没有以同样的速度发展。学生的反思和积极行动与反馈素养的发展有关,这在他们的复习改进中得到了证明。讨论了同伴反馈素养的教学促进作用以及在学术写作复习中使用同伴反馈的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Assessing Writing
Assessing Writing Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
17.90%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Assessing Writing is a refereed international journal providing a forum for ideas, research and practice on the assessment of written language. Assessing Writing publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges concerning writing assessments of all kinds, including traditional (direct and standardised forms of) testing of writing, alternative performance assessments (such as portfolios), workplace sampling and classroom assessment. The journal focuses on all stages of the writing assessment process, including needs evaluation, assessment creation, implementation, and validation, and test development.
期刊最新文献
A comparative study of voice in Chinese English-major undergraduates’ timed and untimed argument writing The impact of task duration on the scoring of independent writing responses of adult L2-English writers A structural equation investigation of linguistic features as indices of writing quality in assessed secondary-level EMI learners’ scientific reports Detecting and assessing AI-generated and human-produced texts: The case of second language writing teachers Effects of a genre and topic knowledge activation device on a standardized writing test performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1