Balancing economical and environmental trade-off in modular construction yard planning: Models and properties

IF 6.8 Q1 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-16 DOI:10.1016/j.clscn.2023.100121
Wen Yi , Huiwen Wang , Runyang Zhong , Lu Zhen
{"title":"Balancing economical and environmental trade-off in modular construction yard planning: Models and properties","authors":"Wen Yi ,&nbsp;Huiwen Wang ,&nbsp;Runyang Zhong ,&nbsp;Lu Zhen","doi":"10.1016/j.clscn.2023.100121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates an integrated yard planning and module transportation problem in modular integrated construction (MiC). A Stackelberg game model is proposed to characterize the relations between the government and contractors. The government is the leader and decides the locations and areas of temporary storage yards to facilitate the cost-effective and eco-friendly transportation of MiC modules. The contractors are the followers and decide the transport mode (i.e., road transport or intermodal transport) for modules to minimize their total transportation costs. This study provides an in-depth analysis of model properties to derive a number of useful managerial insights. The economical and environmental trade-offs between costs and emissions are observed. Our study further proves that an optimal solution is likely to simultaneously reduce the overall costs and carbon emissions, in comparison to choosing the location with the largest area to construct a temporary storage yard. These insights offer a comprehensive framework for understanding the interactions between government and contractors. Overall, this paper aims to promote the implementation of MiC by achieving the economical and sustainable transportation of MiC modules.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100253,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100121"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772390923000306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates an integrated yard planning and module transportation problem in modular integrated construction (MiC). A Stackelberg game model is proposed to characterize the relations between the government and contractors. The government is the leader and decides the locations and areas of temporary storage yards to facilitate the cost-effective and eco-friendly transportation of MiC modules. The contractors are the followers and decide the transport mode (i.e., road transport or intermodal transport) for modules to minimize their total transportation costs. This study provides an in-depth analysis of model properties to derive a number of useful managerial insights. The economical and environmental trade-offs between costs and emissions are observed. Our study further proves that an optimal solution is likely to simultaneously reduce the overall costs and carbon emissions, in comparison to choosing the location with the largest area to construct a temporary storage yard. These insights offer a comprehensive framework for understanding the interactions between government and contractors. Overall, this paper aims to promote the implementation of MiC by achieving the economical and sustainable transportation of MiC modules.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在模块化建筑场地规划中平衡经济和环境的权衡:模型和属性
本研究探讨了模块化集成建造中的集成堆场规划和模块运输问题。提出了一个Stackelberg博弈模型来刻画政府与承包商之间的关系。政府是领导者,决定临时堆场的位置和面积,以促进MiC模块的成本效益和环保运输。承包商是跟随者,决定模块的运输模式(即公路运输或多式联运),以最大限度地降低其总运输成本。本研究对模型属性进行了深入分析,得出了一些有用的管理见解。观察到成本和排放之间的经济和环境权衡。我们的研究进一步证明,与选择面积最大的地点建造临时堆场相比,最佳解决方案可能同时降低总体成本和碳排放。这些见解为理解政府和承包商之间的互动提供了一个全面的框架。总体而言,本文旨在通过实现MiC模块的经济和可持续运输来促进MiC的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trust-centered digital supply chain finance adoption model: mitigating opportunistic behavior and enhancing collaboration for Industry 5.0 and social sustainability Transparency and accountability essential to ESG performance in the supply chain: A Fuzzy DEMATEL approach A cost deployment framework for Industry 5.0 in green supply Chains: Integrating AHP and Fuzzy-QFD with empirical validation from a Manufacturing case study A new hybrid integrated framework for mitigating risks in sustainable supply chains: A case study on Indonesia’s carrageenan industry Empowering farmers: A strategic analysis of blockchain adoption in collaboration with e-tailers for poverty alleviation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1