A new approach to assess safety performance of rail regions with an emphasis on the resources and equipment of each region

Moslem Azizi Bondarabadi , Hamid Rahimi , Hessam Arefkhani , Ali Tavakoli Kashani
{"title":"A new approach to assess safety performance of rail regions with an emphasis on the resources and equipment of each region","authors":"Moslem Azizi Bondarabadi ,&nbsp;Hamid Rahimi ,&nbsp;Hessam Arefkhani ,&nbsp;Ali Tavakoli Kashani","doi":"10.1016/j.jrtpm.2023.100371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Providing a comprehensive overview of the safety status of similar large-scale rail spatial units (such as existing Rail Regions (RRs) in a country) is a first but very important step in identifying policies that can accelerate progress in improving rail safety. The aim of the current study is to present a new approach to assess RR's safety performance with an emphasis on the Resources and Equipment (R&amp;E) of each RR. To reach the study goal, first, a conceptual framework is developed to make a relationship among exposure, safety, and R&amp;E of RRs. In the next step, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model with Fuzzy-Delphi method is used to evaluate the safety performance of different RRs. In this evaluation, the data regarding safety status of 20 RRs of Iran in 2020 are used. Results showed that Region #1 has the best safety efficiency and Northeast Region #20 has the lowest safety efficiency among other regions. It was also revealed how much of each RR's resources (e.g. track repairmen and maintenance crews, etc.) are using inefficiently. Moreover, some suggestions for improving safety performance of each region were also presented based on the amount of resources using inefficiently. By considering R&amp;E of each region in the proposed approach, a more impartial comparison can be made on the RR's safety performance. Therefore, the decision maker could have a more realistic and fairer view of the safety status of different RRs. Finally, it is worth mentioning that previous studies generally aimed at assessing RRs' safety based on their safety level without involving R&amp;E of each RR. However, it seems an incomplete assessment considering the fact that different RRs have different amount of R&amp;E. Thus, the current study is trying to fill this gap by taking into account R&amp;E of each RR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 100371"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210970623000033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Providing a comprehensive overview of the safety status of similar large-scale rail spatial units (such as existing Rail Regions (RRs) in a country) is a first but very important step in identifying policies that can accelerate progress in improving rail safety. The aim of the current study is to present a new approach to assess RR's safety performance with an emphasis on the Resources and Equipment (R&E) of each RR. To reach the study goal, first, a conceptual framework is developed to make a relationship among exposure, safety, and R&E of RRs. In the next step, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model with Fuzzy-Delphi method is used to evaluate the safety performance of different RRs. In this evaluation, the data regarding safety status of 20 RRs of Iran in 2020 are used. Results showed that Region #1 has the best safety efficiency and Northeast Region #20 has the lowest safety efficiency among other regions. It was also revealed how much of each RR's resources (e.g. track repairmen and maintenance crews, etc.) are using inefficiently. Moreover, some suggestions for improving safety performance of each region were also presented based on the amount of resources using inefficiently. By considering R&E of each region in the proposed approach, a more impartial comparison can be made on the RR's safety performance. Therefore, the decision maker could have a more realistic and fairer view of the safety status of different RRs. Finally, it is worth mentioning that previous studies generally aimed at assessing RRs' safety based on their safety level without involving R&E of each RR. However, it seems an incomplete assessment considering the fact that different RRs have different amount of R&E. Thus, the current study is trying to fill this gap by taking into account R&E of each RR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种新的铁路区域安全绩效评估方法,强调每个区域的资源和设备
全面概述类似大型铁路空间单元(如一个国家现有的铁路区域)的安全状况,是确定可以加快改善铁路安全进展的政策的第一步,但也是非常重要的一步。当前研究的目的是提出一种新的方法来评估RR的安全性能,重点是每个RR的资源和设备(R&;E)。为了达到研究目标,首先,建立了暴露、安全和R&;RR的E。下一步,使用模糊德尔菲方法的数据包络分析(DEA)模型来评估不同RR的安全性能。在本次评估中,使用了2020年伊朗20个RR的安全状况数据。结果表明,在其他地区中,1号地区的安全效率最高,20号东北地区的安全效益最低。还揭示了每个RR的资源(如轨道修理工和维护人员等)使用效率低下的程度。此外,根据资源使用效率低下的情况,提出了提高各地区安全绩效的建议。通过考虑R&;在所提出的方法中,每个区域的E,可以对RR的安全性能进行更公正的比较。因此,决策者可以对不同RR的安全状况有更现实、更公平的看法。最后,值得一提的是,以前的研究通常旨在根据RR的安全水平来评估其安全性,而不涉及R&;E。然而,考虑到不同的RR具有不同的R&;E.因此,目前的研究试图通过考虑R&;E。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
A MILP model to improve the robustness of a railway timetable by retiming and rerouting in a complex bottleneck area A decomposition approach to solve the individual railway crew Re-planning problem A Bi-objective model and a branch-and-price-and-cut solution method for the railroad blocking problem in hazardous material transportation Relationships between service quality and customer satisfaction in rail freight transportation: A structural equation modeling approach The evaluation of competition effect on rail fares using the difference-in-difference method through symmetric and lagged spans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1