Assessing the risk perception of soil degradation using a college student sample

R. Kay Kastner-Wilcox , Sabine Grunwald , Monika Ardelt , Stefan Gerber , Tracy Irani
{"title":"Assessing the risk perception of soil degradation using a college student sample","authors":"R. Kay Kastner-Wilcox ,&nbsp;Sabine Grunwald ,&nbsp;Monika Ardelt ,&nbsp;Stefan Gerber ,&nbsp;Tracy Irani","doi":"10.1016/j.soisec.2022.100083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study explores the social-psychological dimensions of risk perception to soil degradation using a structural equation model that integrates knowledge, emotion (affect), experience, values, and social norms. The survey and resulting model were created through the adaption of a survey developed and empirically tested to assess climate change risk perception. The model was tested on a sample of college students (<em>n</em> = 513). Results indicate that our model explains nearly two-thirds (63%) of the variance in risk perception of soil degradation, with knowledge accounting for a substantial portion of the variance both directly to risk perception and as mediated by affect. Experience and social norms were also significant predictors of risk perception, while values, gender and political affiliation exhibited no significant predictor value for risk perception.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74839,"journal":{"name":"Soil security","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100083"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006222000491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the social-psychological dimensions of risk perception to soil degradation using a structural equation model that integrates knowledge, emotion (affect), experience, values, and social norms. The survey and resulting model were created through the adaption of a survey developed and empirically tested to assess climate change risk perception. The model was tested on a sample of college students (n = 513). Results indicate that our model explains nearly two-thirds (63%) of the variance in risk perception of soil degradation, with knowledge accounting for a substantial portion of the variance both directly to risk perception and as mediated by affect. Experience and social norms were also significant predictors of risk perception, while values, gender and political affiliation exhibited no significant predictor value for risk perception.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以大学生为样本评估土壤退化的风险认知
本研究采用结构方程模型,结合知识、情感(影响)、经验、价值观和社会规范,探讨了土壤退化风险感知的社会心理维度。该调查和由此产生的模型是通过改编为评估气候变化风险感知而制定和实证测试的调查而创建的。该模型在大学生样本(n=513)上进行了测试。结果表明,我们的模型解释了土壤退化风险感知的近三分之二(63%)的方差,知识在直接与风险感知相关的方差中占很大一部分,也在由影响介导的方差中。经验和社会规范也是风险感知的重要预测因素,而价值观、性别和政治派别对风险感知没有显著的预测价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil security
Soil security Soil Science
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
90 days
期刊最新文献
Differential modulation of rhizosphere dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) by wheat cultivars under nitrogen deficiency Potential of crop residues management for soil organic carbon sequestration in European countries until 2050: a simplified modelling approach Toward net-zero farming systems using diversity, integration, and perenniality in the Black Soil Zone of the Canadian prairies: A co-design approach Soil health responses to terrace construction - part I Estimating potentially toxic elements in Brazilian tropical soils with vis-NIR spectroscopy and machine learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1