Child-to-parent intergenerational support and its association with subjective well-being among older adults: A cross-national comparison of American and Korean parents

IF 2.4 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Wellbeing Space and Society Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI:10.1016/j.wss.2023.100177
Lanlan Chu , Elsa Joly , Mary-Genevieve Moisan
{"title":"Child-to-parent intergenerational support and its association with subjective well-being among older adults: A cross-national comparison of American and Korean parents","authors":"Lanlan Chu ,&nbsp;Elsa Joly ,&nbsp;Mary-Genevieve Moisan","doi":"10.1016/j.wss.2023.100177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Rapid population aging in the United States and South Korea has implications for intergenerational relationships and support between adult children and older parents. However, given the two countries’ different cultural and social norms and economic development, older adults’ perceptions and experiences of intergenerational support may differ. This study utilizes data from the 2018 wave of the Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study and the Korean Longitudinal Study of Ageing to examine the relationship between intergenerational support from children to parents and the subjective well-being of older American and Korean parents. Employing the Probit model, our findings reveal significant and positive associations between receiving emotional support from adult children and the well-being of older parents in both countries. However, receiving financial transfers from adult children is negatively associated with the subjective well-being of older American parents, while this association is positive but not statistically significant among older Korean parents. Furthermore, we explored specific subgroups and found that child-to-parent emotional contact significantly contributes to the subjective well-being of fathers, individuals not living with their children, and parents in higher income percentiles. In contrast, receiving financial transfers from adult children plays a significantly positive role in the well-being of older Korean mothers and parents in lower income percentiles. These results highlight the importance of developing interventions tailored to specific countries and groups and effectively addressing the unique needs and challenges older adults face in diverse cultural and socioeconomic contexts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52616,"journal":{"name":"Wellbeing Space and Society","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100177"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wellbeing Space and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666558123000507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid population aging in the United States and South Korea has implications for intergenerational relationships and support between adult children and older parents. However, given the two countries’ different cultural and social norms and economic development, older adults’ perceptions and experiences of intergenerational support may differ. This study utilizes data from the 2018 wave of the Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study and the Korean Longitudinal Study of Ageing to examine the relationship between intergenerational support from children to parents and the subjective well-being of older American and Korean parents. Employing the Probit model, our findings reveal significant and positive associations between receiving emotional support from adult children and the well-being of older parents in both countries. However, receiving financial transfers from adult children is negatively associated with the subjective well-being of older American parents, while this association is positive but not statistically significant among older Korean parents. Furthermore, we explored specific subgroups and found that child-to-parent emotional contact significantly contributes to the subjective well-being of fathers, individuals not living with their children, and parents in higher income percentiles. In contrast, receiving financial transfers from adult children plays a significantly positive role in the well-being of older Korean mothers and parents in lower income percentiles. These results highlight the importance of developing interventions tailored to specific countries and groups and effectively addressing the unique needs and challenges older adults face in diverse cultural and socioeconomic contexts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
子女对父母的代际支持及其与老年人主观幸福感的关系:美国和韩国父母的跨国比较
美国和韩国的人口快速老龄化对成年子女和年长父母之间的代际关系和支持产生了影响。然而,鉴于两国不同的文化和社会规范以及经济发展,老年人对代际支持的看法和经历可能有所不同。这项研究利用2018年健康与退休纵向研究和韩国老龄化纵向研究的数据,研究了从子女到父母的代际支持与美国和韩国老年父母的主观幸福感之间的关系。运用Probit模型,我们的研究结果揭示了在这两个国家,从成年儿童那里获得情感支持与年长父母的幸福感之间存在显著而积极的联系。然而,从成年子女那里获得资金转移与美国老年父母的主观幸福感呈负相关,而这种关联在韩国老年父母中是积极的,但在统计上并不显著。此外,我们研究了特定的亚组,发现儿童与父母的情感接触对父亲、不与子女生活在一起的个人以及收入较高的父母的主观幸福感有显著贡献。相比之下,从成年子女那里获得资金转移对韩国老年母亲和低收入百分位数父母的福祉起着显著的积极作用。这些结果突出了制定针对特定国家和群体的干预措施的重要性,并有效解决老年人在不同文化和社会经济背景下面临的独特需求和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wellbeing Space and Society
Wellbeing Space and Society Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
124 days
期刊最新文献
Neighborhood ‘double disadvantage’ and child development in inner city and growth areas “If I was in charge”: A qualitative investigation of water security, gender-based violence and wellbeing in Kenya Process and practice in New Zealand Enviroschool implementation The loss of rural vital places: A case study using the social determinants of health framework The contributions of community seed saving to health and wellbeing: A qualitative study in Thunder Bay, Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1