Characteristics of image defined risk factors on outcomes for primary resection of neuroblastoma

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY Surgery in practice and science Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100195
Charbel Chidiac , Andrew Hu , Emily Dunn , Daniel S. Rhee
{"title":"Characteristics of image defined risk factors on outcomes for primary resection of neuroblastoma","authors":"Charbel Chidiac ,&nbsp;Andrew Hu ,&nbsp;Emily Dunn ,&nbsp;Daniel S. Rhee","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The presence of image‑defined risk factors (IDRF) in neuroblastoma plays a large role in decision making for primary resection versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This study investigates how the number and type of IDRFs affect surgical outcomes for primary resection of neuroblastoma.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A retrospective review was performed including patients diagnosed with neuroblastoma with at least one IDRF who underwent primary resection of their tumor between 2003 and 2017. Cross sectional imaging was reviewed by a single pediatric radiologist for determination of IDRFs. Surgical outcomes were compared by &lt;5 versus ≥5 IDRFs and vascular or non‑vascular involvement.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 28 patients were included in the study, 18 with &lt;5 IDRFs and 10 with ≥5 IDRFs. Fifteen patients had vascular involvement and 13 did not. Nine were adrenal, 6 were cervicothoracic, and 5 were abdominal non-adrenal. Patients with ≥5 IDRFs were found to have an increased rate of complications (40% vs 0%; <em>p</em>&lt;0.01), operative time (318 vs 148 min; <em>p</em>&lt;0.01), estimated blood loss (187 mL vs 45 mL; <em>p</em>&lt;0.01), length of stay (9.6 vs 4.9 days; <em>p</em>&lt;0.01), and hospital readmission (20% vs 0%; <em>p</em> = 0.04). No differences were found in degree of resection (<em>p</em> = 0.06). All complications occurred with vascular involvement IDRFs compared to non‑vascular IDRFs (27% vs 0%; <em>p</em> = 0.04).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The presence of ≥5 IDRFs and vascular involvement increases complications associated with primary resection of neuroblastoma. Our findings underscore the importance of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to resection. Further studies are required to determine how different IDRFs influence surgical risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery in practice and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262023000414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The presence of image‑defined risk factors (IDRF) in neuroblastoma plays a large role in decision making for primary resection versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This study investigates how the number and type of IDRFs affect surgical outcomes for primary resection of neuroblastoma.

Materials and methods

A retrospective review was performed including patients diagnosed with neuroblastoma with at least one IDRF who underwent primary resection of their tumor between 2003 and 2017. Cross sectional imaging was reviewed by a single pediatric radiologist for determination of IDRFs. Surgical outcomes were compared by <5 versus ≥5 IDRFs and vascular or non‑vascular involvement.

Results

A total of 28 patients were included in the study, 18 with <5 IDRFs and 10 with ≥5 IDRFs. Fifteen patients had vascular involvement and 13 did not. Nine were adrenal, 6 were cervicothoracic, and 5 were abdominal non-adrenal. Patients with ≥5 IDRFs were found to have an increased rate of complications (40% vs 0%; p<0.01), operative time (318 vs 148 min; p<0.01), estimated blood loss (187 mL vs 45 mL; p<0.01), length of stay (9.6 vs 4.9 days; p<0.01), and hospital readmission (20% vs 0%; p = 0.04). No differences were found in degree of resection (p = 0.06). All complications occurred with vascular involvement IDRFs compared to non‑vascular IDRFs (27% vs 0%; p = 0.04).

Conclusion

The presence of ≥5 IDRFs and vascular involvement increases complications associated with primary resection of neuroblastoma. Our findings underscore the importance of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to resection. Further studies are required to determine how different IDRFs influence surgical risk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影像学确定的神经母细胞瘤原发性切除术预后危险因素的特点
背景神经母细胞瘤中图像定义危险因素(IDRF)的存在在一期切除与新辅助化疗的决策中起着重要作用。本研究调查了IDRF的数量和类型如何影响神经母细胞瘤一期切除的手术结果。材料和方法进行回顾性审查,包括2003年至2017年间接受肿瘤一期切除的被诊断为至少有一例IDRF的神经母细胞瘤患者。由一名儿科放射科医生对横断面成像进行审查,以确定IDRF。通过<;5与≥5 IDRF以及血管或非血管受累。结果本研究共纳入28例患者,其中18例<;5个IDRF,10个IDRF≥5。15名患者有血管受累,13名没有。肾上腺9例,颈胸6例,腹部非肾上腺5例。发现IDRF≥5的患者并发症发生率增加(40%对0%;p<0.01)、手术时间增加(318对148分钟;p<0.05)、估计失血量增加(187毫升对45毫升;p<0.001)、住院时间增加(9.6对4.9天;p<0.01,和再次入院(20%vs 0%;p=0.04)。切除程度无差异(p=0.06)。与非血管性IDRF(27%vs 0%;p=0.04)相比,所有并发症均发生在血管受累的IDRF中。结论≥5个IDRF和血管受累增加了与神经母细胞瘤一期切除相关的并发症。我们的研究结果强调了切除术前新辅助化疗的重要性。需要进一步的研究来确定不同的IDRF如何影响手术风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
期刊最新文献
Emergency laparotomy preoperative risk assessment tool performance: A systematic review Letter to the Editor on “The pulmonary contusion score: Development of asimple scoring system for blunt lung injury” Prevalence and associated factors of acute postoperative pain in adult surgical patients: A prospective study Advances and results in omental patch repair of gastrointestinal perforations: A narrative review Practical evaluation of risk factors in patients with osteoporosis-induced thoracic and lumbar vertebral compression fractures requiring surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1