Effectiveness of Colistin in carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii – A systematic review

Feroz Ahmed , Md Toslim Mahmud , Shabnam Naher , Md Jowel Rana , Rifat Ara , KM Saif-Ur-Rahman
{"title":"Effectiveness of Colistin in carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii – A systematic review","authors":"Feroz Ahmed ,&nbsp;Md Toslim Mahmud ,&nbsp;Shabnam Naher ,&nbsp;Md Jowel Rana ,&nbsp;Rifat Ara ,&nbsp;KM Saif-Ur-Rahman","doi":"10.1016/j.hsr.2023.100113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Treatment of carbapenem-resistant <em>Acinetobacter baumannii</em> (CR<em>Ab</em>) infections has become a significant challenge for physicians due to its resistance to common antibiotics. Colistin, previously banned, has been reintroduced despite debates about its effectiveness and safety. We aimed to synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of Colistin in the CR<em>Ab</em> infection management, based on current literature. We conducted a comprehensive search to identify relevant studies on the effectiveness of Colistin in treating CR<em>Ab</em> infection in major databases such as Medline through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, and Scopus. We did not limit the search by age of participants, sex, region, or year of publication, but we only included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental studies, cohort studies, case-control studies, and cross-sectional studies published in English, which had at least one comparison control group. Two independent authors screened articles, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in selected articles using the RoBANS tool. Our search retrieved 7907 articles, of which five were included after the sequential screening. All five studies were retrospective case-control studies from five different countries, with a total of 776 participants. Two studies showed a lower mortality rate in the intervention (Colistin) group as the primary outcome, whereas two studies showed the opposite mortality trend. One study reported a higher rate of infection remission in the intervention group, but the result was not statistically significant. Our systematic review could not find any robust evidence to support the effectiveness of Colistin over commonly used antibiotics. Due to the large discrepancy among the primary outcomes of the included studies, we recommend further randomized controlled trials with a larger number of participants to determine the suitability of Colistin for treating CR<em>Ab</em> infections.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73214,"journal":{"name":"Health sciences review (Oxford, England)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health sciences review (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772632023000399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAb) infections has become a significant challenge for physicians due to its resistance to common antibiotics. Colistin, previously banned, has been reintroduced despite debates about its effectiveness and safety. We aimed to synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of Colistin in the CRAb infection management, based on current literature. We conducted a comprehensive search to identify relevant studies on the effectiveness of Colistin in treating CRAb infection in major databases such as Medline through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, and Scopus. We did not limit the search by age of participants, sex, region, or year of publication, but we only included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental studies, cohort studies, case-control studies, and cross-sectional studies published in English, which had at least one comparison control group. Two independent authors screened articles, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in selected articles using the RoBANS tool. Our search retrieved 7907 articles, of which five were included after the sequential screening. All five studies were retrospective case-control studies from five different countries, with a total of 776 participants. Two studies showed a lower mortality rate in the intervention (Colistin) group as the primary outcome, whereas two studies showed the opposite mortality trend. One study reported a higher rate of infection remission in the intervention group, but the result was not statistically significant. Our systematic review could not find any robust evidence to support the effectiveness of Colistin over commonly used antibiotics. Due to the large discrepancy among the primary outcomes of the included studies, we recommend further randomized controlled trials with a larger number of participants to determine the suitability of Colistin for treating CRAb infections.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粘菌素对耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌的治疗效果——系统综述
由于其对常见抗生素的耐药性,治疗耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌(CRAb)感染已成为医生面临的重大挑战。尽管对其有效性和安全性存在争议,但先前被禁止的粘菌素已被重新引入。我们旨在根据现有文献,综合关于粘菌素在CRAb感染管理中有效性的证据。我们通过PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、the Cochrane Library和Scopus在Medline等主要数据库中进行了全面搜索,以确定粘菌素治疗CRAb感染有效性的相关研究。我们没有按参与者的年龄、性别、地区或发表年份限制搜索,但我们只包括随机对照试验(RCT)、准实验研究、队列研究、病例对照研究和以英语发表的横断面研究,这些研究至少有一个比较对照组。两位独立作者使用RoBANS工具筛选文章,提取数据,并评估所选文章中的偏见风险。我们的搜索检索到7907篇文章,其中5篇是在顺序筛选后收录的。所有五项研究都是来自五个不同国家的回顾性病例对照研究,共有776名参与者。两项研究显示,干预组(粘菌素)的死亡率较低是主要结果,而两项研究的死亡率趋势相反。一项研究报告称,干预组的感染缓解率较高,但结果没有统计学意义。我们的系统综述没有发现任何有力的证据来支持粘菌素对常用抗生素的有效性。由于纳入研究的主要结果之间存在很大差异,我们建议进行更多参与者的进一步随机对照试验,以确定粘菌素是否适合治疗CRAb感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health sciences review (Oxford, England)
Health sciences review (Oxford, England) Medicine and Dentistry (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
75 days
期刊最新文献
Deciphering the intricacies of immune system dysfunction and its impact on diabetes mellitus: Revisiting the communication strategies to manage diabetes mellitus Revolutionizing menopause management: Nonhormonal therapy for vasomotor symptoms Harnessing the power of natural products against bacterial urinary tract infections: A perspective review for cultivating solutions Unveiling the therapeutic potential of butein: A comprehensive review Advancements in ulcerative colitis management: A critical assessment of etrasimod therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1