Identification of most relevant variables and processes to assess the environmental impacts of remediation technologies along their life cycles: Focus on the waste management scenarios

IF 5.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Resources, conservation & recycling advances Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rcradv.2023.200155
M. Menegaldo , L. Pizzol , A. Tinello , P. Scanferla , A. Zabeo , S. Breda , A. Marcomini , S.A. Frisario , L. Zaninetta , G. Bonfedi , F. Villani , E. Semenzin
{"title":"Identification of most relevant variables and processes to assess the environmental impacts of remediation technologies along their life cycles: Focus on the waste management scenarios","authors":"M. Menegaldo ,&nbsp;L. Pizzol ,&nbsp;A. Tinello ,&nbsp;P. Scanferla ,&nbsp;A. Zabeo ,&nbsp;S. Breda ,&nbsp;A. Marcomini ,&nbsp;S.A. Frisario ,&nbsp;L. Zaninetta ,&nbsp;G. Bonfedi ,&nbsp;F. Villani ,&nbsp;E. Semenzin","doi":"10.1016/j.rcradv.2023.200155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The application of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to remediation technologies is still not a consolidated practice and it is especially lacking in the assessment of the environmental impacts associated to the management of the waste produced during remediation. This study aims at addressing these methodological gaps by identifying the typologies of waste typically generated during the remediation of a contaminated site and classifying them according to the European Waste Catalogue (EWC) codes. Thereafter, the following steps are: (i) the identification of the waste management scenarios (WMSs) applicable to the identified waste typologies, (ii) the selection of Life Cycle Assessment processes that can be used to assess the impacts of the different WMSs and (iii) the quantification and comparison of the environmental impacts caused by the different WMSs applied considering hazardousness levels to which the same waste may belong in relation to its contamination levels and characteristics: inert, non-hazardous and hazardous waste (Waste Framework Directive 2008/98/EC). As results, a matrix reporting the classes and typologies of waste, their EWC codes, their different WMSs and the suitable LCA processes from the Ecoinvent database that can be applied to each EWC within a specific WMS, has been developed. Additionally, the comparative assessment of the impacts caused by the Ecoinvent processes applicable to the same waste typology within the same WMS has been performed to support the selection of the most appropriate WMS case by case.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74689,"journal":{"name":"Resources, conservation & recycling advances","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 200155"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources, conservation & recycling advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667378923000275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The application of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to remediation technologies is still not a consolidated practice and it is especially lacking in the assessment of the environmental impacts associated to the management of the waste produced during remediation. This study aims at addressing these methodological gaps by identifying the typologies of waste typically generated during the remediation of a contaminated site and classifying them according to the European Waste Catalogue (EWC) codes. Thereafter, the following steps are: (i) the identification of the waste management scenarios (WMSs) applicable to the identified waste typologies, (ii) the selection of Life Cycle Assessment processes that can be used to assess the impacts of the different WMSs and (iii) the quantification and comparison of the environmental impacts caused by the different WMSs applied considering hazardousness levels to which the same waste may belong in relation to its contamination levels and characteristics: inert, non-hazardous and hazardous waste (Waste Framework Directive 2008/98/EC). As results, a matrix reporting the classes and typologies of waste, their EWC codes, their different WMSs and the suitable LCA processes from the Ecoinvent database that can be applied to each EWC within a specific WMS, has been developed. Additionally, the comparative assessment of the impacts caused by the Ecoinvent processes applicable to the same waste typology within the same WMS has been performed to support the selection of the most appropriate WMS case by case.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定最相关的变量和过程,以评估修复技术在其生命周期中的环境影响:重点关注废物管理情景
生命周期评估(LCA)在修复技术中的应用仍然不是一种统一的做法,尤其是在评估与修复过程中产生的废物管理相关的环境影响方面。本研究旨在通过识别污染场地修复过程中通常产生的废物类型,并根据欧洲废物目录(EWC)代码对其进行分类,来解决这些方法上的差距。此后,以下步骤是:(i)识别适用于所识别的废物类型的废物管理场景(WMS),(ii)可用于评估不同WMS影响的生命周期评估过程的选择,以及(iii)考虑到同一废物可能属于的与其污染水平和特征相关的危险性水平,对不同WMS造成的环境影响进行量化和比较:惰性,无害和危险废物(废物框架指令2008/98/EC)。因此,已经开发了一个矩阵,报告了废物的类别和类型、EWC代码、不同的WMS以及Ecoinvent数据库中适用于特定WMS中每个EWC的适当LCA过程。此外,还对适用于同一WMS内相同废物类型的Ecoinvent工艺造成的影响进行了比较评估,以支持根据具体情况选择最合适的WMS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resources, conservation & recycling advances
Resources, conservation & recycling advances Environmental Science (General)
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
期刊最新文献
Attitudes and preferences of the Chinese public towards products made from recycled materials: A text mining approach Decoding sustainable consumption behavior: A systematic review of theories and models and provision of a guidance framework A two-step approach to recycling hydroponics waste nutrient solutions using fertiliser drawn forward osmosis and chemical precipitation Electrolysis and waste heat utilisation in the sustainable transition of Germany's energy system Cost factors affecting the utilisation of secondary materials in the construction sector: A systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1