Développement lexical dans le cadre d’une déficience intellectuelle : le point sur la question

IF 0.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychologie Francaise Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.psfr.2022.03.001
A. Comblain , A. Witt , J.-P. Thibaut
{"title":"Développement lexical dans le cadre d’une déficience intellectuelle : le point sur la question","authors":"A. Comblain ,&nbsp;A. Witt ,&nbsp;J.-P. Thibaut","doi":"10.1016/j.psfr.2022.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Lexical development of children with intellectual disability has received poor attention in the scientific literature compared to general language development. PubMed and Scopus databases identify around 13,000 peer-reviewed scientific publications on general language development of people with intellectual disabilities and 20 times fewer results on lexical development.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The studies analyzed in this article refer to two distinct fields of research: (1) the comparative study of children with disabilities and neurotypical children's developmental trajectories and (2) the description of the referential content of the lexicon and of the learning process. The first line of research describes the general shape of the lexical acquisition trajectory of children with intellectual disabilities; trajectory marked by a later and less important lexical explosion than the one observed in neurotypical children. It is also marked by the highlighting of the respective influence of mental age and chronological age (or life experience) in lexical development; the first being involved in the development of both the expressive and receptive side of the vocabulary and the second impacting only the receptive side. The second line of research gives elements of explanation for the problem identified in the mastery of complex areas of the lexicon (abstract words or relational vocabulary). These difficulties are often interpreted in terms of a deficit of conceptual knowledge and therefore of access to semantic memory. This line of research also describes the use of lexical constraints and principles in children with intellectual disabilities. The conclusions of these studies highlight abilities to generalize new words to new examples comparable to those observed in neurotypical children. The intersyndromic variability, more particularly the specific lexical profiles of people with trisomy 21 and those with Williams syndrome, crosses the two lines of research and makes it possible to identify what is specific to intellectual disability from what is specific to a particular syndrome. However, many questions still remain unanswered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44717,"journal":{"name":"Psychologie Francaise","volume":"68 1","pages":"Pages 91-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologie Francaise","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033298422000231","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Lexical development of children with intellectual disability has received poor attention in the scientific literature compared to general language development. PubMed and Scopus databases identify around 13,000 peer-reviewed scientific publications on general language development of people with intellectual disabilities and 20 times fewer results on lexical development.

Discussion

The studies analyzed in this article refer to two distinct fields of research: (1) the comparative study of children with disabilities and neurotypical children's developmental trajectories and (2) the description of the referential content of the lexicon and of the learning process. The first line of research describes the general shape of the lexical acquisition trajectory of children with intellectual disabilities; trajectory marked by a later and less important lexical explosion than the one observed in neurotypical children. It is also marked by the highlighting of the respective influence of mental age and chronological age (or life experience) in lexical development; the first being involved in the development of both the expressive and receptive side of the vocabulary and the second impacting only the receptive side. The second line of research gives elements of explanation for the problem identified in the mastery of complex areas of the lexicon (abstract words or relational vocabulary). These difficulties are often interpreted in terms of a deficit of conceptual knowledge and therefore of access to semantic memory. This line of research also describes the use of lexical constraints and principles in children with intellectual disabilities. The conclusions of these studies highlight abilities to generalize new words to new examples comparable to those observed in neurotypical children. The intersyndromic variability, more particularly the specific lexical profiles of people with trisomy 21 and those with Williams syndrome, crosses the two lines of research and makes it possible to identify what is specific to intellectual disability from what is specific to a particular syndrome. However, many questions still remain unanswered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智力残疾背景下的词汇发展:问题进展
与一般语言发展相比,智力残疾儿童的词汇发展在科学文献中受到的关注较少。PubMed和Scopus数据库确定了约13000份关于智障人士一般语言发展的同行评审科学出版物,而关于词汇发展的结果则少了20倍。讨论本文分析的研究涉及两个不同的研究领域:(1)残疾儿童和神经典型儿童发展轨迹的比较研究;(2)词汇参考内容和学习过程的描述。第一条研究线描述了智障儿童词汇习得轨迹的总体形状;与在神经正常儿童中观察到的相比,以较晚且不那么重要的词汇爆发为标志的轨迹。它还突出了心理年龄和时间年龄(或生活经验)对词汇发展的影响;第一个涉及词汇表达和接受方面的发展,第二个只影响接受方面。第二条研究线为掌握词汇的复杂领域(抽象词或关系词汇)中发现的问题提供了解释要素。这些困难通常被解释为缺乏概念知识,因此缺乏对语义记忆的访问。这条研究线还描述了智力残疾儿童使用词汇约束和原则的情况。这些研究的结论强调了将新词概括为与神经正常儿童相似的新例子的能力。综合征间的变异性,尤其是21三体患者和威廉姆斯综合征患者的特定词汇特征,跨越了两条研究线,使我们能够从特定综合征的特异性中识别出智力残疾的特异性。然而,许多问题仍然没有得到解答。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychologie Francaise
Psychologie Francaise PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Psychologie française is the official organ of Société française de psychologie. It publishes original articles, most of the time within thematic issues. Considered as a reference publication, which covers all fields of psychology, its contents are used for tuition.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Influence of sex on judgments of an aggressive North African woman Quelle formation des savoirs sur le cancer et la chimiothérapie orale en contexte d’ETP ? Apports d’une approche psychosociale articulée à un dispositif de triangulation méthodologique Étude exploratoire de profils d’enseignants à risque de burnout : association avec les processus de coping et le sentiment d’auto-efficacité Adaptation française et propriétés psychométriques de l’échelle d’utilisabilité perçue des sites web « Design-oriented evaluation of perceived usability (DEEP) »
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1