Representations of traffickers in official UK discourse: Examining the least known component of the human trafficking equation

IF 1.4 4区 社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY International Journal of Law Crime and Justice Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijlcj.2023.100592
Konstantinos Kosmas Gaitis
{"title":"Representations of traffickers in official UK discourse: Examining the least known component of the human trafficking equation","authors":"Konstantinos Kosmas Gaitis","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlcj.2023.100592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Through a framework that combines literature's observations on traffickers' policy-based representations with International Relations (IR) theories, this paper explores the representations of traffickers and anti-trafficking government goals in policies of the United Kingdom's (UK), Scottish and Northern Irish governments. Policies were found to mostly subscribe to a Realist's viewing of human trafficking, emphasising criminal choices. Still, and despite their growing tendency to focus on a wider range of traffickers, their dominant narrative tends to revolve around trafficking stereotypes, often ignoring the full spectrum of traffickers' identities to promote <em>total human trafficking elimination</em>. This discourse may overstate Britain's trafficking problem, sustaining state legitimacy and intervention and narrowing down the scope of anti-trafficking efforts. Conclusively, to ensure a more effective anti-trafficking response, the UK needs to set more feasible goals and based on an in-depth knowledge of traffickers strive to further enrich the policy-promoted human trafficking narrative.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46026,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law Crime and Justice","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 100592"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law Crime and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756061623000186","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Through a framework that combines literature's observations on traffickers' policy-based representations with International Relations (IR) theories, this paper explores the representations of traffickers and anti-trafficking government goals in policies of the United Kingdom's (UK), Scottish and Northern Irish governments. Policies were found to mostly subscribe to a Realist's viewing of human trafficking, emphasising criminal choices. Still, and despite their growing tendency to focus on a wider range of traffickers, their dominant narrative tends to revolve around trafficking stereotypes, often ignoring the full spectrum of traffickers' identities to promote total human trafficking elimination. This discourse may overstate Britain's trafficking problem, sustaining state legitimacy and intervention and narrowing down the scope of anti-trafficking efforts. Conclusively, to ensure a more effective anti-trafficking response, the UK needs to set more feasible goals and based on an in-depth knowledge of traffickers strive to further enrich the policy-promoted human trafficking narrative.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贩运者在英国官方话语中的表现:研究人口贩运等式中最不为人所知的部分
通过将文献对贩运者基于政策的陈述的观察与国际关系理论相结合的框架,本文探讨了贩运者的陈述和反贩运政府目标在英国、苏格兰和北爱尔兰政府政策中的体现。研究发现,政策大多赞同现实主义者对人口贩运的看法,强调犯罪选择。尽管他们越来越倾向于关注更广泛的贩运者,但他们的主导叙事往往围绕着贩运的刻板印象,往往忽视了贩运者的全部身份,以促进彻底消除人口贩运。这种言论可能夸大了英国的人口贩运问题,维持了国家的合法性和干预,缩小了打击人口贩运的范围。最后,为了确保更有效地打击人口贩运,英国需要制定更可行的目标,并在深入了解贩运者的基础上,努力进一步丰富政策推动的人口贩运叙事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice is an international and fully peer reviewed journal which welcomes high quality, theoretically informed papers on a wide range of fields linked to criminological research and analysis. It invites submissions relating to: Studies of crime and interpretations of forms and dimensions of criminality; Analyses of criminological debates and contested theoretical frameworks of criminological analysis; Research and analysis of criminal justice and penal policy and practices; Research and analysis of policing policies and policing forms and practices. We particularly welcome submissions relating to more recent and emerging areas of criminological enquiry including cyber-enabled crime, fraud-related crime, terrorism and hate crime.
期刊最新文献
Perceived procedural justice and deviant behaviors in school: The moderating role of bullying victimization Perspectives on peer mentoring and employment prospects post release for incarcerated women in England and Wales Criminal record expungement and resocialisation: German experience and reflections for China Understanding the role of case management systems in criminal investigations Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1