Digital transparency and citizen participation: Evidence from the online crowdsourcing platform of the City of Sacramento

IF 7.8 1区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Government Information Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.giq.2023.101868
Boyuan Zhao , Shaoming Cheng , Kaylyn Jackson Schiff , Yeonkyung Kim
{"title":"Digital transparency and citizen participation: Evidence from the online crowdsourcing platform of the City of Sacramento","authors":"Boyuan Zhao ,&nbsp;Shaoming Cheng ,&nbsp;Kaylyn Jackson Schiff ,&nbsp;Yeonkyung Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.giq.2023.101868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines the relationship between digital transparency and citizens' participation in government activity, specifically, online crowdsourcing. Many local governments have enhanced service transparency by disclosing and sharing information of government activities in digital format. These digital-driven transparency mechanisms often introduce interactive, tailor-made, and user-generating features to online government platforms. This paper explores the efficacy of digital transparency on citizens' participation in online crowdsourcing activities and its heterogeneous influences on various socioeconomic groups. Using the Propensity Score Matching and Difference-in-Differences (PSM-DID) method, this study analyzes the impact of digitized information disclosure to citizens' participation in Sacramento 311, an online crowdsourcing platform. It is found that enhancing digital transparency promotes citizens' participation in online crowdsourcing activities. Furthermore, results suggest that the influence of digital transparency on citizen participation is short termed and varies across communities of different socioeconomic conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48258,"journal":{"name":"Government Information Quarterly","volume":"40 4","pages":"Article 101868"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Government Information Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X23000680","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between digital transparency and citizens' participation in government activity, specifically, online crowdsourcing. Many local governments have enhanced service transparency by disclosing and sharing information of government activities in digital format. These digital-driven transparency mechanisms often introduce interactive, tailor-made, and user-generating features to online government platforms. This paper explores the efficacy of digital transparency on citizens' participation in online crowdsourcing activities and its heterogeneous influences on various socioeconomic groups. Using the Propensity Score Matching and Difference-in-Differences (PSM-DID) method, this study analyzes the impact of digitized information disclosure to citizens' participation in Sacramento 311, an online crowdsourcing platform. It is found that enhancing digital transparency promotes citizens' participation in online crowdsourcing activities. Furthermore, results suggest that the influence of digital transparency on citizen participation is short termed and varies across communities of different socioeconomic conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字透明度和公民参与:来自萨克拉门托市在线众包平台的证据
本文研究了数字透明度与公民参与政府活动,特别是在线众包之间的关系。许多地方政府通过以数字形式披露和共享政府活动信息,提高了服务透明度。这些数字驱动的透明机制通常为在线政府平台引入互动、量身定制和用户生成功能。本文探讨了数字透明度对公民参与在线众包活动的影响及其对不同社会经济群体的异质影响。本研究采用倾向得分匹配和差异中的差异(PSM-DID)方法,分析了数字化信息披露对在线众包平台Sacramento 311公民参与的影响。研究发现,提高数字透明度可以促进公民参与在线众包活动。此外,研究结果表明,数字透明度对公民参与的影响是短期的,并且在不同社会经济条件的社区中有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Government Information Quarterly
Government Information Quarterly INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Government Information Quarterly (GIQ) delves into the convergence of policy, information technology, government, and the public. It explores the impact of policies on government information flows, the role of technology in innovative government services, and the dynamic between citizens and governing bodies in the digital age. GIQ serves as a premier journal, disseminating high-quality research and insights that bridge the realms of policy, information technology, government, and public engagement.
期刊最新文献
A more secure framework for open government data sharing based on federated learning Does trust in government moderate the perception towards deepfakes? Comparative perspectives from Asia on the risks of AI and misinformation for democracy Open government data and self-efficacy: The empirical evidence of micro foundation via survey experiments Transforming towards inclusion-by-design: Information system design principles shaping data-driven financial inclusiveness Bridging the gap: Towards an expanded toolkit for AI-driven decision-making in the public sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1