Where are my dragons? Replicating refugia to enhance the detection probability of an endangered cryptic reptile

IF 1.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-05 DOI:10.1016/j.actao.2023.103910
George Madani , Rod Pietsch , Chad T. Beranek
{"title":"Where are my dragons? Replicating refugia to enhance the detection probability of an endangered cryptic reptile","authors":"George Madani ,&nbsp;Rod Pietsch ,&nbsp;Chad T. Beranek","doi":"10.1016/j.actao.2023.103910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Rare and cryptic species require effective monitoring methods in order to track populations over time. Monitoring surveys utilizing artificial refugia are an increasingly applied tool for detecting herpetofauna; yet for many species, limited information is available on the factors that influence optimal detectability. Most monitoring programs utilize only one type of artificial refuge. This approach has limitations as it may overlook the dynamic habitat needs of some species, with different refugia required under different conditions. Here we investigate whether using two different types of artificial refugia could maximize overall detection of the endangered Monaro grassland earless dragon <em>Tympanocryptis osbornei</em> by providing refugia that match habitat use. <em>Tympanocryptis osbornei</em> is a grassland specialist endemic to the Monaro Plains of southern NSW which occurs within a fragmented and altered agricultural landscape. Artificial refuge habitat in the form of customized replica ‘spider’ tubes and concrete roof tiles were utilized to infer the highest detection probability when compared to traditional rock rolling techniques. We found tubes to be more successful than tiles (mean: 0.021, 0.010–0.037 95% Bayesian credible interval (BCI) vs mean: 0.0096, 0.0045–0.018 95% BCI). However, this was dependent on air temperature, as tiles became more effective between 25 and 30 °C when dragons were more likely to be using surface shelters. Artificial refugia on a transect level (12 tubes and 12 tiles) had the greatest detection probability (mean: 0.11, 0.04–0.23 95% BCI) compared to individually checked objects. Our results identify the best current methods and conditions to detect <em>T. osbornei</em> and provide insights into additional considerations for optimizing survey efforts, timing, and detectability for other small reptiles in temperate climates. We recommend a combination of artificial refugia be considered in future surveys for cryptic reptiles.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55564,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103910"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1146609X2300022X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rare and cryptic species require effective monitoring methods in order to track populations over time. Monitoring surveys utilizing artificial refugia are an increasingly applied tool for detecting herpetofauna; yet for many species, limited information is available on the factors that influence optimal detectability. Most monitoring programs utilize only one type of artificial refuge. This approach has limitations as it may overlook the dynamic habitat needs of some species, with different refugia required under different conditions. Here we investigate whether using two different types of artificial refugia could maximize overall detection of the endangered Monaro grassland earless dragon Tympanocryptis osbornei by providing refugia that match habitat use. Tympanocryptis osbornei is a grassland specialist endemic to the Monaro Plains of southern NSW which occurs within a fragmented and altered agricultural landscape. Artificial refuge habitat in the form of customized replica ‘spider’ tubes and concrete roof tiles were utilized to infer the highest detection probability when compared to traditional rock rolling techniques. We found tubes to be more successful than tiles (mean: 0.021, 0.010–0.037 95% Bayesian credible interval (BCI) vs mean: 0.0096, 0.0045–0.018 95% BCI). However, this was dependent on air temperature, as tiles became more effective between 25 and 30 °C when dragons were more likely to be using surface shelters. Artificial refugia on a transect level (12 tubes and 12 tiles) had the greatest detection probability (mean: 0.11, 0.04–0.23 95% BCI) compared to individually checked objects. Our results identify the best current methods and conditions to detect T. osbornei and provide insights into additional considerations for optimizing survey efforts, timing, and detectability for other small reptiles in temperate climates. We recommend a combination of artificial refugia be considered in future surveys for cryptic reptiles.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我的龙在哪里?复制避难所以提高对濒危神秘爬行动物的检测概率
稀有和隐蔽物种需要有效的监测方法,以便随着时间的推移追踪种群。利用人工避难所进行监测调查是检测疱疹病毒的一种越来越实用的工具;然而,对于许多物种来说,关于影响最佳探测能力的因素的信息有限。大多数监控程序只使用一种类型的人工避难所。这种方法有局限性,因为它可能忽略了一些物种的动态栖息地需求,在不同的条件下需要不同的避难所。在这里,我们研究了使用两种不同类型的人工避难所是否可以通过提供与栖息地使用相匹配的避难所,最大限度地全面检测濒危的莫纳罗草原无耳龙Tympanocryptis osbornei。Tympanocryptis osbornei是新南威尔士州南部Monaro平原的特有草原专家,分布在支离破碎的农业景观中。与传统的岩石滚动技术相比,采用定制的复制“蜘蛛”管和混凝土屋顶瓷砖形式的人工避难所栖息地来推断最高的检测概率。我们发现试管比瓦片更成功(平均值:0.021,0.010–0.037 95%贝叶斯可信区间(BCI)vs平均值:0.0096,0.0045–0.018 95%BCI)。然而,这取决于空气温度,因为当龙更可能使用表面避难所时,瓷砖在25至30°C之间变得更有效。与单独检查的对象相比,横断面水平上的人工避难所(12根管子和12块瓷砖)具有最大的检测概率(平均值:0.11,0.04–0.23 95%脑机接口)。我们的研究结果确定了目前检测T.osbornei的最佳方法和条件,并为优化温带气候中其他小型爬行动物的调查工作、时间和可检测性提供了额外的考虑因素。我们建议在未来对神秘爬行动物的调查中考虑人工避难所的组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
>0 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Oecologica is venue for the publication of original research articles in ecology. We encourage studies in all areas of ecology, including ecosystem ecology, community ecology, population ecology, conservation ecology and evolutionary ecology. There is no bias with respect to taxon, biome or geographic area. Both theoretical and empirical papers are welcome, but combinations are particularly sought. Priority is given to papers based on explicitly stated hypotheses. Acta Oecologica also accepts review papers.
期刊最新文献
Influence of habitat complexity on the ground spider community in gallery forests of the Cerrado biome Cover crops improve soil fertility and have contrasting effects on leaf and root maize litter decomposition in the Pampas, Argentina Thermal refugia and summer survival of the non-native land snail Theba pisana in Pampean coastal dunes: the role of invasive iceplants Area enclosures as a nature-based solution for vegetation restoration: Evidence from soil seed bank dynamics in Southern Ethiopia Linking depth and surface: how microhabitats and landscape features shape cave invertebrate fauna in the Brazilian semiarid
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1