Contrasting mechanisms of nutrient mobilization in rhizosphere hotspots driven by straw and biochar amendment

IF 10.3 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Soil Biology & Biochemistry Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-14 DOI:10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.109212
Wenhui Shang , Bahar S. Razavi , Shuihong Yao , Cunkang Hao , Yakov Kuzyakov , Evgenia Blagodatskaya , Jing Tian
{"title":"Contrasting mechanisms of nutrient mobilization in rhizosphere hotspots driven by straw and biochar amendment","authors":"Wenhui Shang ,&nbsp;Bahar S. Razavi ,&nbsp;Shuihong Yao ,&nbsp;Cunkang Hao ,&nbsp;Yakov Kuzyakov ,&nbsp;Evgenia Blagodatskaya ,&nbsp;Jing Tian","doi":"10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.109212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Straw return strategies are widely used green management practices that can alter soil organic matter transformation and dynamics through changes in microbial community structure and functions. How the exogenous input of organic materials of contrasting qualities affects the composition of dominant taxa, growth, and microbial functional properties related to nutrient acquisition in space remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the hotsopts and kinetics of C- and N-acquiring hydrolases, microbial growth, and bacterial community structure in maize rhizosphere hotspots after the addition of straw and straw-derived biochar using soil zymography, substrate-induced respiration and high-throughput sequencing. Compared with no amendment and maize straw-derived biochar, straw addition increased the growing biomass and microbial specific growth rate by 1.2–1.6 and 1.7–2.0-fold, respectively, indicating the relative dominance of fast-growing r-strategists. This corresponds to an increased relative abundance of the keystone taxa <em>Firmicutes</em> and their gene copies encoding β-1,4-glucosidase (BG) and β-<em>N</em>-acetylglucosaminidase (NAG). The potential activity and affinity (V<sub>max</sub> and K<sub>m</sub>) of BG increased 2.2 and 1.8 times, respectively, and those of NAG increased 4.0 and 2.0 times, respectively. In contrast, the relative abundance of <em>Actinobacteria</em> belonging to <em>K-</em>strategists increased in the biochar-amended soil. This resulted in slower growth and retarded enzymatic activity than the straw return treatment. Biochar enhanced the root biomass by 31% and increased the rhizosphere hotspot extents of BG and NAG by 26% and 47%, respectively. The highest robustness and modularity of the co-occurrence network indicated a more stable network with biochar input. In summary, the addition of straw accelerated rhizosphere nutrient cycling by triggering microbial growth, especially fast-growth <em>r</em>-strategists (<em>Firmicutes</em>), and synthesizing a large number of enzymes. In contrast, the addition of biochar increased rhizosphere nutrient mobilization by expanding the extent of rhizosphere hotspots to mobilize nutrients from a larger soil volume. This suggests that there are different strategies for nutrient mobilization in the rhizosphere with contrasting exogenous C addition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21888,"journal":{"name":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 109212"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038071723002742","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Straw return strategies are widely used green management practices that can alter soil organic matter transformation and dynamics through changes in microbial community structure and functions. How the exogenous input of organic materials of contrasting qualities affects the composition of dominant taxa, growth, and microbial functional properties related to nutrient acquisition in space remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the hotsopts and kinetics of C- and N-acquiring hydrolases, microbial growth, and bacterial community structure in maize rhizosphere hotspots after the addition of straw and straw-derived biochar using soil zymography, substrate-induced respiration and high-throughput sequencing. Compared with no amendment and maize straw-derived biochar, straw addition increased the growing biomass and microbial specific growth rate by 1.2–1.6 and 1.7–2.0-fold, respectively, indicating the relative dominance of fast-growing r-strategists. This corresponds to an increased relative abundance of the keystone taxa Firmicutes and their gene copies encoding β-1,4-glucosidase (BG) and β-N-acetylglucosaminidase (NAG). The potential activity and affinity (Vmax and Km) of BG increased 2.2 and 1.8 times, respectively, and those of NAG increased 4.0 and 2.0 times, respectively. In contrast, the relative abundance of Actinobacteria belonging to K-strategists increased in the biochar-amended soil. This resulted in slower growth and retarded enzymatic activity than the straw return treatment. Biochar enhanced the root biomass by 31% and increased the rhizosphere hotspot extents of BG and NAG by 26% and 47%, respectively. The highest robustness and modularity of the co-occurrence network indicated a more stable network with biochar input. In summary, the addition of straw accelerated rhizosphere nutrient cycling by triggering microbial growth, especially fast-growth r-strategists (Firmicutes), and synthesizing a large number of enzymes. In contrast, the addition of biochar increased rhizosphere nutrient mobilization by expanding the extent of rhizosphere hotspots to mobilize nutrients from a larger soil volume. This suggests that there are different strategies for nutrient mobilization in the rhizosphere with contrasting exogenous C addition.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
秸秆和生物炭改良剂驱动根际热点养分动员机制的对比研究
秸秆还田策略是一种广泛使用的绿色管理实践,可以通过改变微生物群落结构和功能来改变土壤有机质的转化和动态。不同品质的有机材料的外源输入如何影响优势类群的组成、生长和与空间营养获取相关的微生物功能特性,目前尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们使用土壤酶谱、底物诱导呼吸和高通量测序研究了添加秸秆和秸秆衍生生物炭后玉米根际热点地区的C和N获取水解酶的吸收和动力学、微生物生长和细菌群落结构。与无改良剂和玉米秸秆衍生生物炭相比,秸秆添加使生长生物量和微生物比生长率分别提高了1.2–1.6和1.7–2.0倍,表明快速生长的r战略家具有相对优势。这对应于关键类群厚壁菌门及其编码β-1,4-葡萄糖苷酶(BG)和β-N-乙酰氨基葡糖苷酶(NAG)的基因拷贝的相对丰度增加。BG的潜在活性和亲和力(Vmax和Km)分别增加了2.2和1.8倍,NAG的潜在活性增加了4.0和2.0倍。相反,在生物炭改良的土壤中,属于K-战略家的放线菌的相对丰度增加了。这导致生长速度比秸秆还田处理慢,酶活性降低。生物炭使根生物量增加31%,BG和NAG的根际热点范围分别增加26%和47%。共生网络的最高鲁棒性和模块性表明具有生物炭输入的网络更稳定。总之,秸秆的添加通过触发微生物生长,特别是快速生长的厚壁菌门(Firmicutes),并合成大量酶,加速了根际营养循环。相反,生物炭的添加通过扩大根际热点的范围来从更大的土壤体积中动员养分,从而增加了根际养分的动员。这表明,与外源碳添加相比,根际养分动员有不同的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Biology & Biochemistry
Soil Biology & Biochemistry 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
9.30%
发文量
312
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Soil Biology & Biochemistry publishes original research articles of international significance focusing on biological processes in soil and their applications to soil and environmental quality. Major topics include the ecology and biochemical processes of soil organisms, their effects on the environment, and interactions with plants. The journal also welcomes state-of-the-art reviews and discussions on contemporary research in soil biology and biochemistry.
期刊最新文献
Phosphorus association with phyllosilicates and organic matter in temperate soils Rapid assembly and functional differentiation of the soil surface microbiome in temperate agricultural soil Long-term N fertilization altered viral community composition and increased functional potentials of phosphorus cycling by causing soil acidification Building soil organic matter differing in physical fractions for fertilizer nitrogen retention Seasonality of microbial functional potentials and community diversity in high-Arctic tundra soils
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1