Global scientific production of robotic liver resection from 2003 to 2022: A bibliometric analysis

Qingjie Zeng, Jin Wang
{"title":"Global scientific production of robotic liver resection from 2003 to 2022: A bibliometric analysis","authors":"Qingjie Zeng,&nbsp;Jin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.lers.2023.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>With the widespread application of robotic liver surgery, the body of literature related to robotic liver resection is growing. However, there is a lack of understanding of the publication activities surrounding robotic liver resection research. This bibliometric study aimed to detect the global publication distributions of robotic liver resection research over the past 20 years.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Articles on robotic liver resection published from January 1, 2003 to August 31, 2022 were extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection database. The publication language was restricted to English. Literature distribution analyses were performed at the country/region, institution, author, and journal levels. In addition, each author's productivity was assessed with Lotka's law. Academic influence was assessed by local citation score and global citation score. The keywords evolution was also analyzed. R software and HistCite were applied for the analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 685 articles were identified, with 4107 local citations and 9458 global citations. These articles were published in 156 journals and written by 2449 authors from 785 institutions in 49 countries/regions. The cumulative publication number of the last 5 years accounted for 66.3% (454/685) of the total publication number. The USA played a leading role in the publication output (212, 30.9%), followed by Italy (120, 17.5%) and China (104, 15.2%). The three countries also had the most citations. Yonsei University from South Korea had the highest publication number (30, 4.4%). The <em>Asian Journal of Surgery</em> published the most articles (51, 7.4%), and <em>Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques</em> had the most local citations (575) and global citations (1115). Sucandy published 44 articles, ranking first in productivity. Choi had many more citations than other scholars, with 465 local citations and 1253 global citations. Lotka's law reflected that the majority of the authors (1783, 72.8%) wrote one document. The top 5 most prominent keywords were “surgery”, “hepatocellular-carcinoma”, “outcomes”, “hepatectomy”, and “experience”.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The number of publications on robotic liver resection research has been rapidly increasing over the last 20 years. The most prolific countries/regions and institutions also had strong academic influence. The articles, institutions and authors with high citations mainly came from USA, China, South Korea, Italy, and Singapore. The research hotspots shifted from survival to complications, mortality, and augmented reality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":32893,"journal":{"name":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","volume":"6 1","pages":"Pages 16-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900923000051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

With the widespread application of robotic liver surgery, the body of literature related to robotic liver resection is growing. However, there is a lack of understanding of the publication activities surrounding robotic liver resection research. This bibliometric study aimed to detect the global publication distributions of robotic liver resection research over the past 20 years.

Methods

Articles on robotic liver resection published from January 1, 2003 to August 31, 2022 were extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection database. The publication language was restricted to English. Literature distribution analyses were performed at the country/region, institution, author, and journal levels. In addition, each author's productivity was assessed with Lotka's law. Academic influence was assessed by local citation score and global citation score. The keywords evolution was also analyzed. R software and HistCite were applied for the analyses.

Results

A total of 685 articles were identified, with 4107 local citations and 9458 global citations. These articles were published in 156 journals and written by 2449 authors from 785 institutions in 49 countries/regions. The cumulative publication number of the last 5 years accounted for 66.3% (454/685) of the total publication number. The USA played a leading role in the publication output (212, 30.9%), followed by Italy (120, 17.5%) and China (104, 15.2%). The three countries also had the most citations. Yonsei University from South Korea had the highest publication number (30, 4.4%). The Asian Journal of Surgery published the most articles (51, 7.4%), and Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques had the most local citations (575) and global citations (1115). Sucandy published 44 articles, ranking first in productivity. Choi had many more citations than other scholars, with 465 local citations and 1253 global citations. Lotka's law reflected that the majority of the authors (1783, 72.8%) wrote one document. The top 5 most prominent keywords were “surgery”, “hepatocellular-carcinoma”, “outcomes”, “hepatectomy”, and “experience”.

Conclusion

The number of publications on robotic liver resection research has been rapidly increasing over the last 20 years. The most prolific countries/regions and institutions also had strong academic influence. The articles, institutions and authors with high citations mainly came from USA, China, South Korea, Italy, and Singapore. The research hotspots shifted from survival to complications, mortality, and augmented reality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2003年至2022年机器人肝切除术的全球科学成果:文献计量学分析
随着机器人肝脏手术的广泛应用,与机器人肝脏切除术相关的文献越来越多。然而,对机器人肝脏切除研究的出版活动缺乏了解。这项文献计量研究旨在检测过去20年来机器人肝脏切除研究的全球出版物分布情况。方法从Web of Science核心收藏数据库中提取2003年1月1日至2022年8月31日发表的关于机器人肝切除术的文章。出版语言仅限于英语。文献分布分析在国家/地区、机构、作者和期刊层面进行。此外,每个作者的生产力都用洛卡定律进行了评估。学术影响力通过当地引文得分和全球引文得分进行评估。并对关键词的演变进行了分析。R软件和HistCite进行分析。结果共发现685篇文章,其中本地引用4107篇,全球引用9458篇。这些文章发表在156种期刊上,由来自49个国家/地区785个机构的2449位作者撰写。最近5年的累计出版数量占总出版数量的66.3%(454/685)。美国在出版物产出中发挥了主导作用(21230.9%),其次是意大利(12017.5%)和中国(10415.2%)。这三个国家也被引用最多。韩国延世大学的发表数量最高(30.4.4%)。《亚洲外科杂志》发表的文章最多(51.7.4%),《外科内窥镜和其他介入技术》的本地引用次数最多(575次),全球引用次数(1115次)。Sucandy发表了44篇文章,生产力排名第一。Choi的引用次数比其他学者多得多,共有465次地方引用和1253次全球引用。洛特卡定律反映了大多数作者(1783年,72.8%)只写了一份文件。前五个最突出的关键词是“手术”、“肝细胞癌”、“结果”、“肝脏切除术”和“经验”。结论在过去20年中,机器人肝脏切除术研究的出版物数量迅速增加。产量最高的国家/地区和机构也具有强大的学术影响力。引用率较高的文章、机构和作者主要来自美国、中国、韩国、意大利和新加坡。研究热点从生存转移到并发症、死亡率和增强现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery
Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery minimally invasive surgery-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery aims to provide an academic exchange platform for minimally invasive surgery at an international level. We seek out and publish the excellent original articles, reviews and editorials as well as exciting new techniques to promote the academic development. Topics of interests include, but are not limited to: ▪ Minimally invasive clinical research mainly in General Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, Urology, Neurosurgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, Gastroenterology, Orthopedics, Colorectal Surgery, Otolaryngology, etc.; ▪ Basic research in minimally invasive surgery; ▪ Research of techniques and equipments in minimally invasive surgery, and application of laparoscopy, endoscopy, robot and medical imaging; ▪ Development of medical education in minimally invasive surgery.
期刊最新文献
Use of indocyanine green fluorescence for triple gallbladder cholecystectomy: A case report Helicobacter pylori infection may result in poor gastric cleanliness in magnetically controlled capsule gastroscopy examination: A single-center retrospective study Gastric leiomyoma presenting as an endophytic growth of cardia of the stomach: A case report A live birth resulting from a fourth cesarean scar pregnancy after combined hysteroscopic and laparoscopic uterine repair: A case report and literature review A new abdominal drainage tube fixation method for 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy improves patients’ postoperative quality of life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1