Initial fluid resuscitation guided by the Parkland formula leads to high fluid volumes in the first 72 h, increasing mortality and the risk for kidney injury

Laura Lindahl , Tuomas Oksanen , Andrew Lindford , Tero Varpula
{"title":"Initial fluid resuscitation guided by the Parkland formula leads to high fluid volumes in the first 72 h, increasing mortality and the risk for kidney injury","authors":"Laura Lindahl ,&nbsp;Tuomas Oksanen ,&nbsp;Andrew Lindford ,&nbsp;Tero Varpula","doi":"10.1016/j.burnso.2023.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Our Burn center has used the Parkland formula (4 ml/kg/TBSA%) adjusted by physiological parameters to guide fluid resuscitation in burn patients. Our main objective was to examine fluid resuscitation in patients with major burn injury and its effect on mortality, need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) and the length of stay (LOS) in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Further aims were to determine which factors were associated with fluid resuscitation volumes during the first 24 h, and whether these fluid volumes had an association with the volumes infused during the next 48 h.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective observational study accrued patients (N = 46) admitted to the Helsinki Burn Center between 2016 and 2018 with burn injuries ≥ 20% TBSA. The national intensive care registry and the electronic patient record system provided data on fluid infusions, urine output, laboratory measurements, presence of inhalation injury, surgical procedures within 72 h from injury, patient demographics, need for renal replacement therapy and mortality. Patients were divided into groups based on infused fluid volumes and univariate regressions were performed to identify factors associated with fluid volumes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>48% of the patients received fluids more than 6 ml/kg/TBSA% during the first 24 h. 35% of the patients received fluid volumes exceeding the Ivy index (250 ml/kg/d) and was associated with higher TBSA%, SOFA and SAPS scores as well as increased mortality and need for RRT. Higher lactate and lower base excess were associated with higher fluid volumes. Urine output had no association with the resuscitation volumes. Larger resuscitation volumes during the first 24 h were associated with larger fluid volumes given also during the next 48 h. Higher cumulative fluid volume in 0–72 h resulted in increased need of RRT and higher ICU mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Using the Parkland formula and adjusting the infusion based on physiological parameters leads to over resuscitation in many of the patients. It seems that the more fluids are given during the initial resuscitation phase, the more fluids are also administered during the subsequent phase. Higher cumulative fluid volumes are associated with RRT requirements and higher mortality. We postulate that starting fluid resuscitation with a lower infusion rate could be beneficial, as it may lead to smaller cumulative fluid volumes during the first 72 h, leading to reduced mortality and kidney injury.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72486,"journal":{"name":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","volume":"7 3","pages":"Pages 51-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912223000093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Our Burn center has used the Parkland formula (4 ml/kg/TBSA%) adjusted by physiological parameters to guide fluid resuscitation in burn patients. Our main objective was to examine fluid resuscitation in patients with major burn injury and its effect on mortality, need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) and the length of stay (LOS) in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Further aims were to determine which factors were associated with fluid resuscitation volumes during the first 24 h, and whether these fluid volumes had an association with the volumes infused during the next 48 h.

Methods

This retrospective observational study accrued patients (N = 46) admitted to the Helsinki Burn Center between 2016 and 2018 with burn injuries ≥ 20% TBSA. The national intensive care registry and the electronic patient record system provided data on fluid infusions, urine output, laboratory measurements, presence of inhalation injury, surgical procedures within 72 h from injury, patient demographics, need for renal replacement therapy and mortality. Patients were divided into groups based on infused fluid volumes and univariate regressions were performed to identify factors associated with fluid volumes.

Results

48% of the patients received fluids more than 6 ml/kg/TBSA% during the first 24 h. 35% of the patients received fluid volumes exceeding the Ivy index (250 ml/kg/d) and was associated with higher TBSA%, SOFA and SAPS scores as well as increased mortality and need for RRT. Higher lactate and lower base excess were associated with higher fluid volumes. Urine output had no association with the resuscitation volumes. Larger resuscitation volumes during the first 24 h were associated with larger fluid volumes given also during the next 48 h. Higher cumulative fluid volume in 0–72 h resulted in increased need of RRT and higher ICU mortality.

Conclusion

Using the Parkland formula and adjusting the infusion based on physiological parameters leads to over resuscitation in many of the patients. It seems that the more fluids are given during the initial resuscitation phase, the more fluids are also administered during the subsequent phase. Higher cumulative fluid volumes are associated with RRT requirements and higher mortality. We postulate that starting fluid resuscitation with a lower infusion rate could be beneficial, as it may lead to smaller cumulative fluid volumes during the first 72 h, leading to reduced mortality and kidney injury.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
帕克兰配方奶粉指导的初始液体复苏会在最初72小时内导致高液体量,增加死亡率和肾损伤风险
背景我们的烧伤中心使用根据生理参数调整的Parkland配方奶粉(4ml/kg/TBSA%)来指导烧伤患者的液体复苏。我们的主要目的是检查严重烧伤患者的液体复苏及其对死亡率、肾替代治疗(RRT)需求和重症监护室(ICU)住院时间(LOS)的影响。进一步的目的是确定哪些因素与前24小时的液体复苏量有关,以及这些液体量是否与接下来48小时的输注量有关。国家重症监护登记处和电子患者记录系统提供了关于输液、尿液输出、实验室测量、是否存在吸入性损伤、损伤后72小时内的外科手术、患者人口统计、肾脏替代治疗需求和死亡率的数据。根据输液量将患者分组,并进行单变量回归以确定与输液量相关的因素。结果48%的患者在前24小时内接受了6ml/kg/TBSA%以上的输液。35%的患者接受的液体量超过Ivy指数(250 ml/kg/d),并与较高的TBSA%、SOFA和SAPS评分以及死亡率和RRT需求增加有关。较高的乳酸和较低的碱过量与较高的液体体积有关。尿量和复苏量无关。在前24小时内较大的复苏量与在接下来的48小时内给予的较大的液体量有关。0-72小时内累积液体量越高,导致RRT需求增加,ICU死亡率越高。结论使用帕克兰公式并根据生理参数调整输液会导致许多患者过度复苏。似乎在最初的复苏阶段给予的液体越多,在随后的复苏阶段也给予的液体就越多。较高的累积液体量与RRT需求和较高的死亡率相关。我们假设,以较低的输注率开始液体复苏可能是有益的,因为它可能会在最初的72小时内导致较小的累积液体量,从而降低死亡率和肾损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Innovative surgical management of large burn wounds in patients with elevated body weight to enhance team safety Skin graft take rate among minor burns – A cohort study to investigate the effect of factors such as burn depth, burn size, and timing of the operation A systematic review of the Novosorb® Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix in the treatment of complex wounds A systematic review of the clinical use of a single-layer bovine collagen-elastin acellular dermal matrix Microbial profile of burn wound injuries in the Northern West Bank − A retrospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1